gumtrea

[GP Q @argosaki]

THE BIGGEST HEIST IN SPORTS HISTORY JUST GOT EXPOSED.

They thought the global distractions would keep your eyes off the ball.
But the house of cards is collapsing.

The 2026 World Cup wasn't just a tournament.
It was a highly orchestrated, algorithmically controlled wealth extraction event.
And the independent Group of Copenhagen just blew the whistle.

$240 BILLION.
That is the staggering amount of money that flowed through global betting markets during the 104 matches of the 2026 World Cup. Double the amount from Qatar. This wasn't organic betting.
This was a synchronized extraction.

The independent international advisory body just flagged SEVEN specific matches for severe manipulation.

Remember the 84th-minute red card for South Africa's Themba Zwane in the opening match against Mexico?
It wasn't a referee error.
It was a scheduled execution. Moments before that card was pulled, an untraceable crypto-syndicate dumped $14.2 million into dark web prediction markets. They knew the exact minute the card would drop.

Remember the Spain vs. Cape Verde match that shockingly ended in a 0-0 draw?
A single entity on the cryptocurrency platform Polymarket placed $4.8 million betting that Spain would NOT win. Who takes that kind of risk unless the outcome is already written in stone?

And the most glaring evidence: The 3.5-minute VIDEO ACTION REPLAY (VAR) delay before disallowing Ferran Torres’ goal against Saudi Arabia.
That delay wasn't for reviewing footage.
That 210-second window was specifically utilized to allow high-level syndicate members to execute massive high-frequency trades across global markets before the decision was announced.

They weaponized the VAR technology.
It’s not there for accuracy.
It’s a delay mechanism designed to manipulate live betting liquidity.

On July 2nd, Folarin Balogun received a red card.
On that EXACT SAME DAY, before FIFA even confirmed his suspension status, betting markets mysteriously opened asking if he would play.
They had insider knowledge from the highest levels.

FIFA's response?
Their "Integrity Task Force" released a panicked statement claiming "no suspicious betting activity" was found.
A blatant lie directly contradicting the independent investigators.

The Deep State uses these massive events to move billions in untraceable crypto, funding their black operations while the masses cheer.
The referees, the VAR operators, the top executives—they are all compromised.

The panic in Zurich is deafening. Emergency meetings are being held.
They know the Copenhagen Group has the blockchain receipts tying the Polymarket accounts directly to offshore accounts controlled by globalist elites.

The illusion of fair play is dead. The final red card is about to be issued.

SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE.

https://t. me/AXIOS4B

[Madame Susanne @Susanne30521946]

Nicklas Nilsson förklarar skillnaden mellan höger och vänstermänniskor i klockren text på Facebook:

"Om en högerpolitisk person är bög, så är han det, och bryr sig inte om vad andra tycker.
Om en vänster är bög, så kräver han lagändringar, protesterar mot allt och alla, och gör det till en politisk kamp.

Om en höger är vegan, så äter han helt enkelt inte kött.
Om en vänster är vegan, så vill han förbjuda kött, stoppa matproduktionen och protestera utanför bondgårdar och hönsfarmer.

Om en höger inte gillar vapen, så köper han inga.
Om en vänster inte gillar vapen, så försöker han förbjuda dem, hindra alla andra från att äga ett, och hatar dem som har.

Om en höger oroar sig för klimatet, så flyger han mindre, kör elbil om det passar honom och sorterar sitt avfall.

Om en vänster oroar sig för klimatet, så vill han förbjuda fossilbilar, flygresor och kött för alla andra, protestera utanför fabriker och kräva att staten tvingar fram förändringen.

Om en höger vill ge sina barn en bra skolgång, så flyttar han till ett område med bra skolor, eller väljer en privatskola eller engagerar sig själv.
Om en vänster vill ge sina barn en bra skolgång, så kräver han mer skattepengar från alla, lika resultat för alla, förbud mot friskolor och protesterar mot varje skillnad.

Om en höger klagar på sitt jobb eller arbetsplats.. det gör han det inte. Han byter jobb eller startar ett eget företag.
Om en vänster klagar på sitt jobb – så är det chefen, företaget eller kollegorna det är fel på. Han kräver kollektivavtal, strejk, förändringar för hela orten och protesterar mot företaget så att det ska passa honom.

Om en höger är missnöjd med sin bostad eller hyra, så flyttar han, renoverar eller köper något annat.
Om en vänster är missnöjd med sin bostad eller hyra, så kräver han hyresstopp, mer bidrag, regleringar för alla och protesterar mot hyresvärdar och politiker.

Om en höger misslyckas med en affär eller en investering som går snett, så reser han sig upp, dammar av sig och försöker igen imorgon.
Om en vänster har slut på pengar den 24:e, så skyller han på att de rika har för mycket och måste bidra mer, skyller på att lotterivinsten inte gick hem förra veckan och muttrar att han har så himla otur.

Om en höger ser det här – så skickar han det till några kompisar för ett gott skratt.
Om en vänster ser det här – så försöker han argumentera emot, få det bortplockat och radera mig från Facebook."

[gratefully aliveXX🕊️ @shanonomous]

It's crushed industry in Nz

[gumtrea @armandleg44]

@Selene_Mariposa Maybe Elon choose this evil person on purpose to bring out the message about child rape . She was so naive and fell for it. Now Elon has to go and take over the Economist publication and fire the lot.

[Selene Mariposa @Selene_Mariposa]

I watched Elon Musk’s interview with The Economist and heard him claim 250,000 girls were systematically raped by grooming gangs in the UK. It sounded too monstrous to be real, so I did what I always do. I went to check the receipts myself.

I wish I hadn’t. It is worse than the number.

A warning first. If this kind of thing enrages you, if you have children, if you do not have the stomach for it today, stop reading here. You do not have to carry it.

Honesty first, because I do not post numbers I cannot defend. The 250,000 figure is not a documented count. It is an extrapolation scaled up from local cases. Here is the hard truth though: it might be accurate, and it might even be low. Nobody can say, because there has never been a full national audit or an investigation of every town. The number is unproven precisely because the country has refused to go looking for it. That refusal is its own answer.

Here is what the government’s investigations did find. The 2014 Jay Report: in Rotherham alone, at least 1,400 children sexually exploited over sixteen years, and that was the conservative estimate. Baroness Casey’s 2025 national audit confirmed the same pattern across Rochdale, Oxford, Oldham, Telford. Nearly 19,000 children flagged as exploitation victims in England in a single year. The Met is re-examining 9,000 cases. No one knows the true total, because for decades the people paid to count deliberately did not.

Both reports found the convicted offenders in these networks were Pakistani Muslim men. And officials avoided recording that fact out of fear of being called racist. Let that land. They stayed silent about who was doing it because they feared an accusation more than they feared the abuse. Girls as young as eleven were written off as troubled teenagers making lifestyle choices. The system did not fail to see it. It chose not to look.

Then the punishment. Some got what Britain calls serious sentences. Shabir Ahmed, the Rochdale ringleader, 22 years for 30 counts of child rape. Others 35. In much of America a single count could mean life. There, 30 counts draws 22 years, and then they let you out early.

Ahmed served 14 years and walked free this July, shielded from the deportation his victims were promised by a 1971 immigration loophole. Several offenders held dual British-Pakistani citizenship, which is exactly why removal was promised and exactly why the failure to deliver it is so damning. Qari Abdul Rauf served two and a half years of six and is still in Rochdale, seen shopping in the town where he abused children. Adil Khan, who impregnated a 13-year-old, called his case racist and a laughing matter in court and argued he should stay because his son needs a role model.

And the coldest part. For years the trouble was not the abuse. It was talking about it. Britain’s speech laws have only tightened since, with people jailed over social media posts, one woman handed 31 months for a single tweet. A nation that struggled for a decade to jail child rapists moves overnight to jail citizens for the wrong words online.

That is the whole sickness. Rape a child and you may serve half a soft sentence and stroll home. Post the wrong thing about it and the state finds its spine.

So make the sentences serious and mean it. Deport who can be deported. Protect the people exposing this, not the institutions that buried it. And count them. Every town, every case, no matter what the number turns out to be.

Failed by their abusers, the councils, the police, the courts, and a state more offended by a tweet than by their suffering. Every betrayal preventable.

These are children. Say it out loud, whatever it costs, because the silence is what let it happen.

Thank you, Elon, for the reminder that when something sounds too awful to be true, the only responsible thing is to go check the receipts yourself. The number was unproven. What sat underneath it was worse. 🦋

[gumtrea @armandleg44]

@zannymb @elonmusk I can't believe that the WEF is employing a slut like you. Geez they really have to take a serious look at themselves. WTF!

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk broke the media's most powerful weapon on live television.

With a speech from Barack Obama.

Take a speech from Obama or Hillary. Read it to someone on the left. Tell them it's Trump.

Musk: "What do you think of this speech by Trump? Oh wow, he's the worst person ever. Actually, that was a speech by Obama. Actually, that was a speech by Hillary."

Same words. Same positions. Opposite reaction.

The ideas were never the problem. The name attached to them was.

If the audience can't tell Obama's position from the one they're calling "far right," the label was never about policy.

It was about control.

The interviewer pressed him on his support for what she called the far right.

Musk: "No, I support the normal people. What you call the far right, falsely."

She kept pushing.

Musk: "I would like to just admonish you and the media for the absurd characterization of the far right, which is false and misleading and nonsense."

Then this.

Musk: "Please keep this part in."

Five words that say more about modern media than four years of journalism school.

He's not asking for fairness. He's preempting a cut he knows is coming.

That's how the machine works. The parts that expose the framing get cut to protect the frame.

Musk: "You could go back 10 or 15 years and these policies were completely normal."

The positions never moved. The window around them did.

The establishment didn't defeat these ideas. It reclassified the people who held them.

Took mainstream positions. Shifted the acceptable center. Then called everyone who didn't move extreme.

The most effective censorship isn't silencing a position. It's renaming it until it sounds dangerous.

Then the interviewer abandoned policy entirely.

Zanny Minton Beddoes: "It's why people loathe you."

That was the kill shot. On camera. Designed to make him flinch. Soften. Walk it back.

Musk: "Maybe some people do loathe me. I don't care."

Then he buried her.

Musk: "A quarter billion people follow me. I think a lot more people actually like me than don't. And I think a lot more people hate you and the media more than you realize."

She came with a label. She left with a mirror.

The spectrum didn't move right. The establishment moved left and relabeled everyone who stood still.

You don't need to win an argument if you control what the positions are called. You don't need to be right if you decide who gets called wrong.

The public was never asked to evaluate the idea. It was told who said it. That was enough.

That's not journalism. That's power wearing a press badge.

Elon Musk just showed a quarter billion people the mechanism.

And a mechanism that depends on nobody seeing it can't survive exposure.

[Shelley @ProudArmymom66]

The day I learned you can’t harvest organs from a dead person is the day I changed my license from organ donor to not an organ donor.

[TruthTeller 🚀 @Wasps1969]

@InTheTrenchesUK This explains it quite nicely 🤣

[Christian @InTheTrenchesUK]

I am intellectually incapable of addressing why a man who builds actual rockets dismissed my entire worldview as 'absurd,' so I will pretend this humiliation was a 'discussion' and promote it as content. I am terrified that people watched him tell me more people hate me than I realize, so I am using the phrase 'key takeaways' to sound authoritative. There are no key takeaways. I was dismantled on camera. I hope you don't notice that the public enjoyed watching me suffer. Please watch the full segment so my employer at the Italian industrialist-owned magazine doesn't notice that I have never built anything except my own delusion of importance. I am a small woman in a borrowed worldview and Elon Musk exposed it.

[gumtrea @armandleg44]

@BarryYoungNZ @NuZillund

[CONSTITUTION X 🇺🇸 @ConstitustionX]

🚨 ABC JUST DROPPED A BOMBSHELL — AND IT’S TERRIFYING! 🚨
They’re finally admitting what we’ve warned about for YEARS: the toxic chemicals in your “protective” sunscreen are ABSORBING into your blood… and they’re linked to CANCER. 😱
Every single person I know who’s battled skin cancer? They slathered this poison on daily. 😭
ARE YOU STILL RUBBING THIS CANCER CAUSE ON YOUR BABIES’ SKIN?!
Parents, wake up before it’s too late!
Drop a 🔥 if you’re switching to mineral/tallow today. Tag every mom you know — this could save lives!
#ToxicSunscreen #CancerCausingChemicals #ProtectOurKids #NaturalSunProtection

[Warnock's @WarnocksNZ]

Paul Henry was right AND got sacked!😳
TVNZ purposely mispronounced "Dikshit" in their pronunciation guide for hosts & journalists because they thought Dikshit was offensive. So call her Dik-sit🤨

[Shubz @shubzlive]

PAUL HENRY MAKES SHUBZ LOSE IT 😂 🙀

[David Wolfe @DavidWolfe]

The sun doesn't cause "cancer"..
...but toxic sunscreen does.

[Barbara Oneill @BarbaraOneillAU]

Cholesterol turns into “vitamin D” when you’re in the sun 🌞

[gumtrea @armandleg44]

@edmandontace01 @the_salty_one_ Geeez dude do a spell check!

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

Young women are told to get a Pap smear every 3 years to ‘prevent’ cervical cancer.

But the brush used to scrape the cervix is sterilized with ethylene oxide .. a known cancer-causing chemical.

The irony is wild.

[Yakub @Yakkubkk]

Clear angle of Messi assist

Wow, this assist deserves to be in a museum

[Holyhekatuiteka @2ETEKA]

🚩Jeez. Paul Henry is an important candidate for Act, a front man who obscures all the weirdos running for candidates.

Meet Martin Lundqvist, Acts Northcote candidate, like a third of their new candidates he’s a foreigner, and he’s a nurse at an old folks home (assisted dying enthusiast).

Martin did a live on Brian Tamaki’s raid by police, stating that Brian said he was going to go shoot up immigrants. This is insane and so is he - watch the video, he’s max nutbar … this kinda junk Act will use Henry to tow into Parliament.