arran ubels

Something in bio later.

[arran ubels @arran4]

@DavidPocock Probably need universal fair use of water and energy laws, that don't just apply to data centers.

[arran ubels @arran4]

@TrisH0x2A Why is the answer in the file path

[arran ubels @arran4]

@nishithX26 Rename it to yaml.. done

[Dave W Plummer @davepl1968]

If you're on a Linux desktop and feeling adventurous, please smoke-test my first drop of Task Manager OG for Linux!

AppImage: https://t.co/3bUdoQfi6T
Debian: https://t.co/R4FqBC2vmD
Tarball: https://t.co/oGqNP590qy

Please note this is (a) my first Linux gui app, and (b) my first attempt at making distribution pacakges, and (c) I don't know what I'm doing.

Let me know how it goes!

[Dithering @ditheringfm]

Watermarks

Anthropic is watermarking text at the behest of the E.U. and Ben and John are not happy.

Subscribe at https://t.co/pItagvylm1

[arran ubels @arran4]

@esrtweet But the use of LLMs means you can push more on to the submitter in the form of proofs of testing, optimization etc, as it's just automated anyway. You should also have minimum requirements which make it easier to verify in review too. Such as example output & higher test coverage

[arran ubels @arran4]

@patrickgwsmith Not a bad idea increasing the minimum contribution requirements to include proofs especially given the burden on reviewers. I've started using more e2e simply because it's easier to review

[arran ubels @arran4]

@KishanBagaria @beeper Is it reversible and colour coded?

[arran ubels @arran4]

@jartine @DanielleFong It escaped what does it matter now?

[arran ubels @arran4]

@esrtweet Like Weather Report but not sure I could imagine it being central

[Eric S. Raymond @esrtweet]

Microsoft will never fix Windows, because the features that enrage users in Windows 11 are exactly the ones that generate recurring revenue and market control. That is exactly *why* they enrage users!

Yes, you'll get reversals of some idiotic user interface decisions. You'll get some speed tweaks. These will be loudly hyped in hopes that they distract you from what you'll never get.

Don't take my word for this, look at what Microsoft is hyping as fixes in their reform program and Windows 12. Do they say a word about no longer requiring a Microsoft account to do a local installation? Or about removing the repeating nag prompts for OneDrive? Do they make any promises to end the advertising spam?

No. And they won't. Because that's where the money is. Windows now exists to broker your eyeballs to third parties and upsell you into Microsoft subscription services.

I've been warning anybody who would listen for 30 years that when you install closed-source software you're accepting a power asymmetry with the vendor. All of their incentives say they should use the control you grant them to take more control. Induce more dependency. Lock you in.

Microsoft has been on this path for a very long time. "DOS isn't done until Lotus won't run!"

You might think these tendencies would be restrained by their fear that when they increase the pain level above some threshold they can't predict in advance, a critically large percentage of their userbase will pay the aggravation cost to escape their clutches. There are two reasons this won't happen, one general and one specific to Microsoft.

The general problem is that corporations differentially respond to market incentives according to how easily they can be measured. Revenue from cloud services and the adtech vampires is a strong, visible signal; exit by pissed off users creates multiple signals that are diffuse and easy to misinterpret.

The Microsoft specific problem is Azure - which, ironically, mostly runs Linux instances. Microsoft now makes most of its money from Azure, which reduces its incentives to care about pissed-off desktop Windows customers bailing out.

Indeed, if I were a cold-blooded Microsoft strategic planner, I might be tempted to deliberately burn up the desktop business for short-term revenue, knowing that that's not where my long-term fortress is. I'm not saying they're actually doing that, but from outside the difference between this move and an over-focus on measurable revenue streams leading to accidental destruction is difficult to make and probably not very informative even if you could.

The bottom line is that it's just not going to get any better. Ever. In fact, bailing out is doomed to get more painful over time. The more process habits you form around Windows, the harder the dependency gets to break.

The conclusion is obvious. Get out now. A lot of major tech influencers have noticed over the last 18 months that after decades of sour jokes about the year of the Linux desktop, Linux is finally ready for you. It's time.

[arran ubels @arran4]

@paulg It's not a serious car brand by the looks of it.

[arran ubels @arran4]

What a way of connecting your browser profile's unique id to your mobile phones PKI public key.

[arran ubels @arran4]

@EdKrassen Police need numbers like license plates on their back

[arran ubels @arran4]

I see github has taken a stance against "hamburger" icon

[arran ubels @arran4]

@cursedconnector It's art

[Scott Miller - Apogee/3D Realms Founder ☢️ @ScottApogee]

Back when we released Wolf3D I begged Id to make a C-64 version and they said it wasn't possible.

Now I'm crying.

[arran ubels @arran4]

@averyfjames Use statements over isms. Ie: "People should be able to set their own prices on things they sell" over "free market"

[arran ubels @arran4]

@iamdevloper Last one, silent C

[I Am Devloper @iamdevloper]

when the only stakeholder value you've delivered is more lines of code