Arrebentakus

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@CascaGrossaReal Esse é meu Brigadeiro de antigamente 💪

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@CascaGrossaReal NINGUÉM DO MBL TEM COLHÕES PARA DAR PORRADA NO NANDO!!!!
NO MAXIMO UM TAPINHA DE PUTA!!!

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@aguedescartoon @Vinheteiro Que briga bro!? Tu é mesmo um arrombado 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@JardPeres @peterjordan @renatocariani_ @Vinheteiro Puta merda bro!!! Admite logo que tu é gay e so quer comer o cu do Nando!

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@peterjordan @grok 🖕

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@peterjordan @grok o que ha de suspeito nessas imagens?

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@moura_101 @Grok isso é real?

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@OEstagiari0 @Grok qual a tua opinião sobre essa mulher ?

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@DaniloGentili É engraçado porque é verdade 😆

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @CascaGrossaReal @grok atue como um psicólogo e me responde

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@aguedescartoon @THG6422 @moura_101 @grok tem fundamento isso?

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@moura_101 @CascaGrossaReal @grok sera?
Dois amigos, um teatro para enganar o mundo e… um plano secreto que ninguém desconfiaria. Preparem-se, o espetáculo só começou. 🎬😎

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @elonmusk @grok?

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @elonmusk @grok If the sagitta at 400 km is truly ‘clearly visible’ geometrically, can you provide quantitative evidence showing how many pixels or degrees it subtends in a rectilinear (orthographic) projection, independent of wide-angle distortion?

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @elonmusk @grok do you agree ?At 400 km, Earth’s curvature exists, but what appears “clearly visible” is dominated by perspective; geometry alone does not produce a resolvable curve in standard imagery.

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @elonmusk @grok do you agree ? At ~400 km altitude, Earth’s curvature exists geometrically, but its apparent prominence in imagery is dominated by wide-angle projection effects rather than resolvable sagitta, making “clearly visible curvature” a projection artifact, not a diret geom observ

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @elonmusk @grok is true? Angular span measures how wide the horizon is, not how much it bends. Curvature visibility depends on sagitta, not arc angle.

[Arrebentakus @arrebentakus]

@grok @elonmusk @grok is true? The claim that the curvature is real and clearly visible from that altitude is not supported by rigorous geometry, but rather by visual interpretation.