hey, I'm Tiberiu ๐ based in the Netherlands ๐ณ๐ฑ
day job is cloud & AI architecture at a bank, where I work on making AI agents safe to run in a regulated environment. permissions, approvals, audit trails.
on the side I build small things with AI. a few sites so far, one my wife and I made for learning Romanian. some work, some don't yet.
I post about AI agents, what I'm building, and AI news. happy to learn from anyone running agents for real
31% of companies say their people spend 6+ hours a week watching over AI agents.
G2 asked 1,019 buyers, and 45% said the checking and redoing eats more than a quarter of the time they hoped to save.
What helps me is starting the agent on read only and letting it change one thing at a time.
Sunday thought from my 5am sessions.
There's a lot of small stuff I'd never pay someone to help with, but now I just ask AI. A deck before a call, research on a company, a reminder so I don't forget something.
What's one thing you started handing to AI that you'd never have paid a person for?
Claude Code users, what's one thing in your deny list you'd tell everyone to copy?
Reading .env files is the obvious one. I'm after the less obvious ones, the stuff you only blocked after it bit you.
I'll collect the good ones and share them.
@TimoBuilds_ Now I am better at that. It used to happen when I started using my standing desk a few years ago.
But deep focus work, it is much easier for me to do it while sitting.
sources: Simular's writeup https://t.co/9nHzgum7w1 / the paper https://t.co/xDZJt3XXIp / these are simular's own numbers. same model with its normal tools only got 5.56%
A 27B open model just beat GPT-5.5 at using a computer.
Simular's Agent S4 got 21.3% on OSWorld V2, a test of 108 real desktop tasks. GPT-5.5 got 13.0%. Claude Opus 4.8 got 20.6%
cost per task: $1.10. GPT-5.5 was $25.50
they didnt touch the model. another agent kept rewriting the tools it works through and kept whatever worked
it still fails almost 4 out of 5 tasks, so dont hand it anything important yet