Anand Ranganathan just completely dismantled the government's mandatory E20 fuel obsession, and every single vehicle owner needs to hear this. 🚨
We are constantly sold the narrative that 20% Ethanol blending is a massive economic masterstroke.
But here is the actual reality check for the consumer:
👉 The Mileage Drop: Ethanol has lower energy density than pure petrol. You are literally paying the exact same price for less power and lower mileage.
👉 The Engine Killer: Forcing E20 into older, non compliant engines causes severe corrosion and mechanical breakdown. The government hits its target, but you pay the massive repair bills.
👉 Coercion Over Choice: A free market thrives on options. Instead of offering E20 as a choice at the pump, it is being shoved down our fuel tanks via a mandatory backdoor tax on efficiency.
Economic progress requires choice, not state coercion.
Watch @ARanganathan72 lay down the absolute scientific facts on why the hidden costs of E20 far outweigh the hyped benefits. 👇
#E20Fuel #EthanolBlending #AnandRanganathan #ConsumerRights
By now you all know what happened in Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan…where 30 MEN CHOSE to Rape a 13 year old CHILD
But there’s ONE thought thats making me physically sick…
The auto driver who kidnapped and raped her KNEW where to take a thirteen-year-old CHILD.
He knew there was a place where she could be SOLD.
You don’t make a choice like that unless you believe it can work.
Unless you have done it before.
She isn’t the first victim.
She is the only victim we know of
To the Government of India.
@PMOIndia@PIB_India@pib_law@HMOIndia@mygovindia@MLJ_GoI
Today’s press conference confirmed the real issue.
The Government’s expert said E20 engines are tested as per AIS specifications. Nobody disputes that.
But that is not the question.
The question is whether legacy vehicles already sold, taxed and registered for fifteen years were originally type-approved, certified and sold under an E20 fuel assumption.
E20-ready vehicles tested on E20 are one category. Legacy vehicles type-approved under earlier fuel specifications are another.
Do not collapse the two.
The Government’s own Roadmap for Ethanol Blending in India: 2020–2025 states plainly, at page 62:
“E20 material compliant and E10 engine tuned vehicles are rolled out all across the country from April 2023… Vehicles with E20 tuned engines are rolled out all across the country from April 2025.”
Read that again.
By the Government’s own roadmap, engines actually tuned for E20 only began rolling out from April 2025 — not 2021, not 2022.
This is confirmed by AIS-137 Part 3, Amendment No. 4, dated 20 July 2022, page 295 of 296, which shifted reference-fuel testing to E20 only from the “compliance phase” beginning April 2023 — before which vehicles were tested against E10 reference fuel under IS:2796.
Even Amendment No. 6 to the same standard, dated 30 November 2022, Clauses 2.19.1, 2.25.1 and 4.1, was still being issued to formally recognise E20 as a distinct reference-fuel category.
So the impression being created that legacy vehicles were already E20-tested and validated in 2021–2022 does not match the Government’s own documentation. It does not match its own Amendment history. And it does not match its own Roadmap.
If the Government still maintains legacy vehicles were E20-tested, publish the model-wise, year-wise, manufacturer-wise type-approval records showing the exact reference fuel used for certification.
1. Not slogans.
2. Not press lines.
3. Records.
Because “E20 vehicles were tested for E20” does not prove that older E10-era vehicles were built, certified, calibrated or protected for E20.
That distinction is the whole case.
A word of thanks, in closing.
Today’s press conference ended up strengthening this case — not weakening it. When the Government’s expert, the Government’s own Roadmap and the Government’s own Amendment history do not say the same thing, that is no longer merely our argument.
It is now part of the public record.
We would encourage the legal community, and everyone who takes constitutional accountability seriously, to look closely at what has been placed on record today.
We remain open to being proven wrong.
We remain firm on the facts.
— Vishal Singh Jain
Director, VSJ Ventures LTD
— Team Bharat
@FactswithDinesh@nachiket1982@ShivrattanDhil1@Nidhzee@MiniforIYC@tehseenp@bsindia@badjourno@KapilSibal@DrAMSinghvi@pbhushan1@IJaising@sanjayuvacha@MenakaGuruswamy@PiyushGoyal@nitin_gadkari@OfficeOfNG@HardeepSPuri@PriyankKharge@REDBOXINDIA@malpani@sabeer@Reuters@business@IndianExpress@FT@nytimes@adityakalra@ManishKasyapsob
Research 1 - https://t.co/fAifr82MjR
Research 2 - https://t.co/Y7fgQ09Dkr
Research 3 - https://t.co/g9D7yiQR8H
If you open a quackery clinic in India, you will attract more patients than the real doctors in your area.
This guy in Nashik is not only hanging a woman upside down, but he is using a concrete compactor to vibrate her butt.
No one stops him. This is the IQ level of people.
The silence surrounding the brutal five-day gang-rape of an innocent 13-year-old girl by 30 men in Ganganagar is absolutely deafening.
There are no protests, no mainstream news broadcasts and no trending topics on X for an act so monstrous.
It raises a disturbing question: is the public and media look the other way purely because this happened under a BJP administration?
Everything is allowed under BJP watch?
मुझे कार की बहुत ज़रूरत नहीं पड़ती है। महीने में दो तीन दिन ही घर से निकलता हूँ। आज कई दिनों बाद कार चलाने गया तो पता चला कि मेरी कार का माइलेज 14km/lसे घट कर 9.6km/lit हो गया है। मेरी कार 2024 की है। 5.4 किलोमीटर प्रति लीटर कम हो गया है। परिवार के लोग इस्तेमाल करते हैं। तेल का ख़र्चा काफ़ी बढ़ गया है।
मुझे लगता है कि E20 भी नोटबंदी है। इसके ज़रिये कार और बाइक चालकों पर निष्ठा प्रयोग हो रहा है कि वे किस हद तक मोदी सरकार को सपोर्ट कर सकते हैं। ज़्यादा पैसे ख़र्च कर घटिया ईंधन ख़रीदने और कार डैमेज होने पर चुप रह सकते हैं। मोदी सरकार का प्रयोग सौ फीसद सफल हो गया है। जिस स्केल पर माइलेज गिरा है, मनमोहन सिंह की सरकार होती तो सारे गोदी संपादक पेट्रोल पंप से लाइव रिपोर्ट कर रहे होते।
नोट चोरी, वोट चोरी, चंदा चोरी, पेपर चोरी के बाद तेल चोरी को भी व्यापक समर्थन मिल रहा है। यह काम केवल मोदी सरकार कर सकती है। उसके समर्थकों का जवाब नहीं। जो लोग 500 रुपया लीटर पेट्रोल ख़रीदने का सपना देख रहे थे, E20 से पूरा करने का मौका मिल गया है। पेट्रोल और कार की मरम्मत का ख़र्चा जोड़ कर इतना हो जाता होगा।
सरकार चाहे तो एक और प्रयोग कर सकती है। पेट्रोल पंप पर मोदी समर्थक 38 प्रतिशत वोटर के लिए E20 का विकल्प दे और मोदी विरोधी 62 प्रतिशत को E10 का विकल्प दे। मुझे लगता है कि डिफ़ेंडर वाली मोहतरमा भी निष्ठा नहीं बदलेंगी और E20 ही भराएँगी। अगर ये हो जाए तो मोदी समर्थकों की ख़ुशी का ठिकाना नहीं रहेगा। 😎
Watch the pattern. It only ever runs one way.
When butter was demonised, Unilever was ready with margarine.
When lard and tallow were demonised, Procter and Gamble was ready with Crisco.
When eggs were demonised, Kellogg's was ready with a bowl of cereal.
When red meat was demonised, Cargill was ready with soy.
When breastfeeding was demonised as backward, Nestlé was ready with formula.
When leather was demonised, BASF was ready with plastic cut to look like hide.
When wool was demonised, ExxonMobil was ready with the feedstock for polyester.
When animal fat itself was demonised, seed oil climbed from industrial waste to the most used cooking fat on earth.
Every one of them was a food or a fibre humans had thrived on for thousands of years, condemned at the exact moment a cheaper factory copy was sitting ready on the shelf.
The product came first. The science came trotting along behind it, right on cue, the instant there was a substitute to sell.
Follow the money. The advice starts to make a great deal more sense.
The Rajasthan rape case of a 13 year old is not leaving me! 30 men raped her! Not a single men had conscience? Not a single men thought to end this trauma? Not a single men had a teenage girl in his family? It took 5 days for police to search her? 😭😭
When I was Muslim, I “knew” the river-test story: God tests Saul’s army by a river, whoever drinks is unworthy, only a few pass, then David kills Goliath. Surah 2:249-251.
Then I opened the Bible and found that test doesn’t belong to Saul at all. The writers of the Quran never read the OG story.
It’s GIDEON. Judges 7. And it’s not Saul’s era — it’s about 150 years earlier, in the time of the judges, before Israel ever had a king.
God tells Gideon his army is too large “lest Israel boast, ‘My own hand has saved me.’” Judges 7:2. He reduces 32,000 men to 300 by how they drink at the water. Judges 7:5-7.
The Quran took Gideon’s water test, pinned it on Saul, then stitched David and Goliath onto the end — fusing two separate accounts from two different centuries.
Same fingerprint as Moses-and-Jacob. Two stories, welded into one.
The Bible keeps Gideon and Saul 150 years apart, never confused.
And Gideon’s 300 won so no one could boast — “not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit, says the LORD.” Zechariah 4:6.
That’s the gospel in advance: victory that leaves no room for boasting.
You didn’t save yourself with your 32,000.
He saved you with a cross, so no flesh could ever glory in His presence. 1 Corinthians 1:29.
Jesus is for ALL.
In Revelation 4:1, John writes: “After these things I looked, and behold, a door standing open in heaven. And the first voice which I heard was like a trumpet speaking with me, saying, ‘Come up here, and I will show you things which must take place after this.’”
In Numbers 10, the Lord commanded Moses to make two silver trumpets. These trumpets symbolized the voice of God and were used to call the congregation together. This is the same imagery John uses in Revelation when he says, “the first voice I heard was like a trumpet speaking.”
We see this confirmed in 1 Thessalonians 4:16, which describes the Lord descending “with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God.” Revelation 4:1 is therefore a clear picture of the Rapture of the Church.
Revelation 5 confirms this further. There, the Church is already in heaven — redeemed by the blood of the Lamb from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation — singing a new song before the throne as a glorified, heavenly assembly.
In contrast, Revelation chapters 6–19 describe the Great Tribulation, also called “the time of Jacob’s trouble.” In these chapters, the Church is nowhere to be found on earth. This absence shows that the Church has already been raptured to heaven.
The seven trumpets therefore have nothing to do with the Rapture. They are instruments of God’s judgment that unleash His wrath during the Tribulation — meteors poisoning the seas, solar and lunar eclipses, plagues of demonic locusts, and a demonic army that kills a third of mankind. These are divine disasters, not the catching away of the saints.
GET YOURSELF READY FOR THE PRE-TRIBULATION RAPTURE WHEN JESUS RETURNS TO SNATCH-AWAY HIS CHURCH IN THE CLOUDS!
---
HOW TO BE SAVED
1 Corinthians 15:3-4
Romans 10:9
Romans 3:23
Ephesians 2:8
John 14:6
John 1:12
Acts 4:12
2 Corinthians 5:21
On July 1, the World Bank reclassified Sri Lanka, Vietnam, and the Philippines from lower-middle-income to upper-middle-income economies.
Their latest GDP per capita stands as follows:
Vietnam: $4,970
Philippines: $4,850
Sri Lanka: $4,670
India transitioned into a lower-middle-income country in 2009 and has remained in that category for nearly two decades. Our current national GDP per capita is approximately $2,800.
Meanwhile, Tamil Nadu has consistently focused on balancing economic growth with social welfare. By the end of this year, the state is projected to reach a GDP per capita of around $6,500- the highest among India’s large states.
As a state in India, Tamil Nadu has already surpassed the average income levels of these newly elevated upper-middle-income countries.
India’s national average of $2,800 masks more than it reveals. On one side, you have states like Tamil Nadu at $6,500; on the other, states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar hover around $1400 and $950, respectively. Consequently, India remains a country with stark regional inequality while still being relatively poor overall.
Furthermore, as noted recently, Tamil Nadu and Kerala maintain some of the lowest internal inequality rates in the nation.
That is why I keep repeating this point: the next 15 years represent a critical, "make-or-break" economic window for India.
A 33-year-old woman at MIT wrote the code that ran inside the Apollo 11 lunar lander, and 20 seconds before Neil Armstrong touched the moon, her program made a decision the astronauts didn't know was happening that was the only reason the mission didn't crash.
Her name was Margaret Hamilton.
She led the team writing every line of code that would fly humans to the moon and back. The part almost nobody knows is that she had to fight to be allowed to do the work at all.
Code in 1965 was not treated as real work.
Rockets were serious. Circuits were serious. Writing code was something the men at NASA thought secretaries could do on the side. Hamilton was told this to her face more than once.
So she started calling what her team did "software engineering."
She used the phrase on purpose. In meetings. In memos. To force people to treat it as a discipline instead of a chore. Colleagues laughed at her the first few times she said it out loud.
That phrase is now the name of the biggest engineering profession on earth.
The story of what her code did on July 20, 1969 is the one every kid should be taught.
Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were 3 minutes from touching down when the computer inside the lunar module started flashing an alarm.
1202.
Then again. Then 1201. Five alarms in four minutes. The computer was telling the astronauts it could not finish everything it had been asked to do.
The computer they were flying with had less memory than a modern microwave.
Someone on the checklist had left a switch in the wrong position, and a radar the astronauts did not even need right then was flooding the computer with data. It was eating around 13% of the machine's brain at the exact moment every second mattered.
In almost any other system, that overload would have frozen the machine.
A frozen machine 30,000 feet above the moon means a crash. It means two dead astronauts and a third one orbiting alone above them, waiting for a signal that would never come.
Hamilton's code did something else.
She had built the software with a rule almost nobody in her field was using at the time. When the machine ran out of room, it would not treat every task as equally important. It would look at the list of jobs it had been asked to do, throw out the ones that could wait, and keep running only the ones keeping the crew alive.
The radar was the low priority job.
The landing was the highest.
So the computer did what she had told it to do. It dumped the radar. It kept flying. The alarm was not a failure. It was the machine reporting that it was handling the overload exactly the way she had designed it to.
Down in Houston, a 24-year-old engineer named Jack Garman recognized the alarm from a test his team had run months earlier. He shouted "Go" to the flight controller. The controller shouted it up to the crew. The landing kept going.
Armstrong touched the surface with 25 seconds of fuel left.
The part that gets lost in every retelling is why Hamilton had built that safety net in the first place.
NASA had not asked for it.
She had added it on her own, years earlier, because her 4-year-old daughter Lauren had once crashed the simulator by pressing a button during a test. The button was one the astronauts had been told they would never press.
Hamilton wanted the code to survive that button press anyway.
Her bosses told her it was a waste of time. Astronauts do not make mistakes.
She insisted. The safety net went in.
Two years later, on the way to the moon, an astronaut left a switch in the wrong position. The exact class of mistake she had been told would never happen.
There is a photograph of her from that period.
She is standing next to a stack of paper as tall as she is. Every page in that stack is the code her team wrote for the mission. She is smiling at the camera like she knows something the rest of the aerospace industry has not figured out yet.
In 2016, Barack Obama put the Presidential Medal of Freedom around her neck and said the astronauts did not have much time, but thankfully, they had Margaret Hamilton.
Every autopilot in every plane you have ever flown on uses a version of what she invented. Every pacemaker. Every self driving car. Every satellite in orbit.
The idea that a machine should know which job matters most and drop the rest when it runs out of room is now the foundation of almost every safety system on the planet.
She wrote it because a 4 year old crashed a simulator and nobody else thought it was worth fixing.
The men in the room laughed at her for calling it engineering.
Then her code was the only thing in the sky that did not fail.
There’s a detail in the golden calf story that the Quran and the Bible flatly contradict — and it exposes which book protects its heroes.
Genesis… I mean Exodus 32. Who made the calf? AARON. The high priest. Moses’ own brother. He gathered the gold, shaped the idol, built an altar. Exodus 32:4-5. And gave the most pathetic excuse in Scripture: “I threw it in the fire, and out came this calf.” Exodus 32:24.
The Quran? Aaron is completely innocent. He tried to stop it. The blame falls on a mystery man, “al-Samiri” — the Samaritan. Surah 20:85-90.
Here’s the problem. The Samaritans didn’t exist in Moses’ day. Samaria wasn’t founded until King Omri built it — around 870 BC, some 500 years AFTER Moses. 1 Kings 16:24.
So the Quran clears the prophet’s brother and pins it on a people who wouldn’t exist for five centuries.
The Bible does the opposite. It nails its own high priest to the wall.
You know what that tells me? A book willing to expose Aaron isn’t protecting anyone’s reputation.
It’s telling the truth.
And that’s exactly the book I want telling me about my sin — and about the true High Priest, who “has no need to offer sacrifices for His own sins,” because He had none. Hebrews 7:26-27.
Aaron built the calf. Jesus bore the guilt for it.
Praise the Lord, Jesus Christ