AR

[Dan Knight @DanKnightMMA]

Pierre Poilievre Declares War on Red Tape and Liberal Decay in Osoyoos

There was a moment in Osoyoos, British Columbia, this week when you could feel the tectonic plates of Canadian politics shift. Pierre Poilievre didn’t just give a campaign speech—he delivered a declaration of war. Not against a rival party, not against a foreign power, but against the bloated, self-sustaining bureaucracy that has buried this country in red tape, crushed small business, and handed our economic sovereignty to Washington.

And he did it with names, numbers, and fire.

Standing beside Conservative candidates Helena Konanz and Dan Albas—real people with skin in the game—Poilievre laid out the most aggressive anti-regulation, pro-prosperity plan Canada has seen in a generation. This wasn’t “efficiency.” It wasn’t “modernization.” It was a full-scale rollback of the federal state.

A 25% cut to red tape within two years.
A “two-for-one” regulation kill rule: for every new rule, two must die.
A dollar-value offset: $1 of new administrative cost must be matched by $2 in cuts.
And for once, someone’s watching the swamp: the Auditor General will audit compliance.

No tricks. No loopholes. No gluing rulebooks together to fake progress like the Liberals did. Real cuts, enforced in public, with consequences.

Now compare that to what the Liberals have done. Under Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney, the number of federal rules has exploded—149,000 and counting. That’s 20,000 more than a decade ago, with $51 billion in annual compliance costs for small businesses. It’s not just inefficiency. It’s economic sabotage.

And who benefits from that sabotage? The United States. Poilievre didn’t dance around it—he hit it head-on. President Trump has said he prefers the Liberals in power. Why? Because they’re weak. Because they keep Canadian oil in the ground and Canadian dollars flowing south.

“Trump supports the Liberals because he wants Canada to stay weak,” Poilievre said. “I want the opposite. I want to bring it home.”

The press tried to corner him—tried to paint him as “too Trump-like.” The irony, of course, is that Trump has openly rejected him, because unlike Trudeau and Carney, Poilievre is not for sale.

And then came the attacks on Aaron Gunn. The media paraded misinformation accusations that Gunn denied the impact of residential schools. Poilievre didn’t flinch. He called it out for what it was: misinformation. He defended his candidate. He stood for truth, not Twitter mobs. And he flipped the narrative: if you want prosperity and dignity for First Nations, give them control over resources, revenue, and jobs—not slogans.

Then came the issue of interprovincial trade, where Poilievre again showed he’s living in the real world. Local wineries in the Okanagan are shipping their product to the U.S. because it’s easier than selling across provincial lines. Under the Liberals, it's harder to trade within Canada than with foreign nations. That’s not a federation—that’s a farce. Poilievre promised to tear down the internal barriers the Laurentian elite have protected for decades.

The CBC? He torched it. Not with culture war talking points, but with precision. It’s become an overfunded, Toronto-centric mouthpiece for the Liberal Party, sucking up $1.5 billion a year to produce less local coverage than ever. Mark Carney just promised another $150 million with no plan to pay for it. Poilievre called it what it is: “a morbidly obese Liberal government—on steroids.”

And he’s right. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal expenditure he’d reverse. Not one. He’s offering the same broken promises, wrapped in fancier language, from the same corrupt team.

Poilievre, on the other hand, laid out a detailed plan to:

Eliminate the GST on new homes and Canadian-made cars.

Cut income taxes by 15%.

Abolish the capital gains tax on money reinvested in Canada.

Fast-track LNG projects on the West Coast.

Repeal every anti-energy, anti-growth law passed by Trudeau’s swamp.

He didn’t ask for permission. He promised results. He’s not trying to manage the decline. He’s here to stop it.

Final Thoughts

I’ve been watching these press conferences like a normal person, which means with my jaw somewhere on the floor. On one side, you’ve got Pierre Poilievre, actually talking about numbers, policies, things that, you know—exist in the real world. On the other side? You’ve got Mark Carney, Trudeau’s old economic braintrust, grinning like a Bond villain, promising to “invest” another $150 million into the CBC—because apparently, $1.5 billion a year isn’t enough to produce wall-to-wall Liberal talking points and a half-hour panel on white fragility.

Carney calls it “public broadcasting.”
Let’s call it what it is: state propaganda—funded by you, weaponized against you.

And this is the guy who’s being sold to Canadians as the adult in the room? The savior? Mark Carney—the guy who’s spent the last decade not in Canada, but lecturing Canadians from London, New York, and climate finance panels in Geneva? He’s not some neutral economist. He’s a gold-plated Davos swamp rat who literally helped engineer the economic disaster we’re now living through—and now he wants to be rewarded with the keys to the kingdom?

This man flew in from Glasgow—no joke—where he was pushing his net-zero snake oil to a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who couldn’t find Fort McMurray on a map if their Tesla battery depended on it. And what’s he proposing now? Keep Bill C-69, the law that strangled Canadian energy, killed pipeline after pipeline, and handed America control over our oil wealth. Keep the law that says: If you want to build anything in this country, you better ask permission from 14 departments and Greta Thunberg’s cousin first.

Oh, and while he’s at it, don’t expect a single dollar of waste to be cut. Not one. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal program he’d reduce. Not the CBC. Not the bloated bureaucracy. Not even the social engineering schemes buried deep in your child’s classroom.

So let’s spell it out: Mark Carney is Trudeau without the TikTok. Same worldview. Same smugness. Same ideology. Except now he’s dressed it up in Oxford accents and finance jargon and thinks you’re too dumb to notice.

He talks about “fighting climate change,” but never mentions the carbon imports from China. He talks about “building the future,” while propping up the same agencies that couldn’t build a bus stop on time. He talks about “standing up to Trump,” while literally keeping in place the laws that give Trump control over our energy, our jobs, our investment.

And we’re supposed to believe he’s the serious one?

No. What he is—is the avatar of managed decline. The velvet glove of the same iron fist that’s been throttling Canadian prosperity for ten years. Poilievre sees it, and he’s naming it. That’s why the media hate him. That’s why the Liberals fear him. And that’s why Donald Trump doesn’t want him elected—because he won’t roll over like Carney will.

So again—this is not a normal election. It’s not Liberal vs. Conservative. It’s not progressive vs. populist. It’s elite decay vs. national revival.

Poilievre doesn’t want to “manage” this slow-motion collapse. He wants to rip the duct tape off the pipes, shut down the bureaucracy, and start building again. He didn’t ask for permission. He didn’t host a panel. He promised results.

And when he says “Canada First,” it’s not some borrowed slogan. It’s a warning to the swamp: Your time is up.

Carney is decline dressed as competence.
Poilievre is the first sign of life this country has had in a decade.

So yeah, Pierre Poilievre chose defiance.

Now it’s your turn.

[AR @arvind78]

@BenMulroney Not a rumor. Was there with my wife to see what the fuss is about. We couldn't get in. 500+ turned away

[Juno News @junonewscom]

“We don’t ask people to check their identities at the door when they come in.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau praises his government’s immigration policies.

[Matt Zenitz @mzenitz]

Maryland is expected to hire Boston College’s Aazaar Abdul-Rahim as co-defensive coordinator and associate head coach for defense, sources tell @247Sports.

Will be a return to Maryland for Abdul-Rahim, a highly respected recruiter who has also produced at least one All-ACC DB each of the last three years at BC. He previously worked at Maryland from 2016-18.

https://t.co/ieBSUsEk9l

[BlackBerry @BlackBerry]

Some CISO's lose sleep over the threat of a “perfect storm” scenario, where multiple risks converge on an organization at the same time.

BlackBerry SVP and CISO Arvind Raman explains the top challenges he and his peers face today:
https://t.co/zKnW8Ecz8G

[AR @arvind78]

I'm looking for an experienced information security leader to drive the Information Security program at BlackBerry and partner with the business leaders in helping manage cyber risks across the organization. Please apply below…https://t.co/4pln6DTOai https://t.co/fhddR8Cd2a

[AR @arvind78]

https://t.co/tjDInULmzk

Fantastic opportunity to be part of an exciting team, leader and organization. Hit that apply button to be considered! https://t.co/wlPxoVEYHd

[AR @arvind78]

I'm pleased to announce that I'm joining the Executive Leadership team of BlackBerry on January 9th as their SVP & CISO reporting to Executive Chairman and CEO John Chen. Look forward to learning from peers, blackberry team members, and contributing posit…https://t.co/Glb0L74O26

[Bleacher Report @BleacherReport]

JEWELL LOYD IS CLUTCH 😤

STORM TAKE GAME 1

(via @seattlestorm)

[AR @arvind78]

Come join us to enhance the product security program at Mitel. The role can be remote anywhere in North America. Review and apply!

#productsecurity #vulnerabilitymanagement #applicationsecurity https://t.co/vAERDPwag7

[MisterCusick @MisterCusick]

@tgraham907 @ChrisHarrisJr 💯💯 Love his tape. I'm genuinely confused why he was let go

[AR @arvind78]

@fit4less are the gyms closed in Toronto today?

[AR @arvind78]

https://t.co/ET91cXXPcb

[CISOseries @cisoseries]

“If there's a new start up trying to reach out to me I ask them to explain. If I'm intrigued b y them, and what problem they are trying to solve. If they can't answer that clearly and concisely then I tend to move on.” - @arvind78, @Mitel

Listen: https://t.co/HNannjzDyz

[David Spark @dspark]

“If there's a new start up trying to reach out to me I ask them to explain. If I'm intrigued b y them, and what problem they are trying to solve. If they can't answer that clearly and concisely then I tend to move on.” - @arvind78, @Mitel

https://t.co/zJbF0fvFms @cisoseries

[AR @arvind78]

Technology when used in the right circumstances can be a great asset against phishing and other cyber attacks. @dspark , Mike Johnson and I discuss this among other things. Have a listen! https://t.co/Ah4CrFhFrE

[David Spark @dspark]

“You're not going to get to a zero percent click rate on phishing attacks. So MFA is a really good way to protect the organization no matter what the security posture is from a phishing perspective.” - @arvind78, @Mitel

Listen: https://t.co/zJbF0fvFms @cisoseries

[AR @arvind78]

It was a pleasure joining @dspark and Mike Johnson on this CISO podcast to discuss, learn and share security learnings...
#CISO #cybersecurity #multifactorauthentication #zerotrust #changemanagement https://t.co/ldIq9hnsYs

[Mitel® Official @Mitel]

[🎙️Podcast] Our CISO @arvind78 and
@cyberhubpodcast discussed trust building and debated security program infrastructure. Listen now to this insightful episode #CISOTalk https://t.co/36QJRSYCuE #CyberSecurity #InfoSec

[AR @arvind78]

@kengleha @escheme @jsensinger @UNB_IBME @UNB Nice Work. If you guys are ever in Toronto, ping me. We should catch upp