It worked.
Gave Claude $20.
Left it coding overnight.
Woke up to:
• finished script
• +$95 from first 5 trades
Didn’t touch anything.
Then I found this wallet:
0xb27b...b82
• $384,858 profit
• 13,070 predictions
• $18.5K biggest win
• Started March 2026
Almost no one is watching it.
While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math.
Started with $80.
→ $4,218 in a few weeks
Every position is identical in structure.
Not trading.
One equation.
Running while you sleep.
Examples:
$17,839 → $36,318 (+103%)
$3,112 → $15,011 (+382%)
$10,676 → $22,178 (+107%)
Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude:
1. Temporal bias
Find BTC time windows with >65% edge.
Ignore everything else.
2. Kelly sizing
Size based on confidence.
Never fixed bets.
f* = (p × b − q) / b
3. Volatility filter
Skip high volatility.
Trade only clean conditions.
4. Bayesian updates
Update probabilities after each trade.
The system improves over time.
Claude built everything while I slept.
Funded it with $20.
First trade fired minutes later.
You’re seeing this early.
That window doesn’t stay open.
You only need Claude + Device + 1 hour/day.
Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it:
1. Comment the word ' DM '
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me @EaStEnRaY1
This Claude bot on Polymarket made $78,083 in 5 days.
Nobody built it to be smart.
They built it to be fast.
$7 → $3,595
$30 → $11,063
$142 → $13,356
$1,205 → $37,939
I found this wallet three days ago.
Spent 48 hours reverse engineering every trade.
Same markets.
Same logic.
Over and over.
Watch BTC price.
Compare to Polymarket odds.
Enter when they don’t match.
Exit when they do.
While you were analyzing charts — this bot was already in and out.
While you were deciding — it was compounding.
While you were sleeping — it was printing.
Most traders try to be right.
This bot just tries to be faster.
$78,000 in 5 days.
Just Claude. Running a loop.
I don’t know who built this.
But I know how they did it.
And it’s all in the article below.
Giving This Free for 24 hours.
To get it:
1. Comment the word 'CLAUDE 4.7'
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me @EaStEnRaY1
Prompt engineering seems to be the future.
The way you communicate with LLM's significantly affects the output generated and in turn affects your ability to create value.
Ineffective use of LLM's + Slightly Above Average Skills = Mediocre Competitive Edge
Anyone else always bouncing between ChatGPT and Cursor to write prompts?
I write my prompt, ask ChatGPT to make it more detailed, then copy and paste it into Cursor over and over again. Wastes so much time and hinders my productivity.
Does anyone else deal with this?
AI code editors don’t suck.
Your prompts do.
Turn your vague ideas into crystal clear prompts with https://t.co/gMdGcmwV1D
#buildinpublic#devtools#SaaS#vibecoding
Ever stayed up until 2AM debugging messy Cursor output?
The problem usually isn’t Cursor—it’s the prompt you’re feeding it.
That’s why I built Promptr. It turns vague requests into clear, actionable prompts designed for maximum impact.
Give it a try: https://t.co/jV9jzxt1ph