@Really_me_101@SameerahMunshi As for quote, 17:70: "Verily We have honored the children of Adam (Quranic term for all humanity). We carry them on the land and the sea, and have made provision of good things for them, and have preferred them above many of those whom We created with a marked preferment."
@Really_me_101@SameerahMunshi Exactly, "those who disbelieve." I think Christians are very clear about what happens to people who do not accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, does that negate their belief about human dignity? Why the double standard? Religions do set theological boundaries of salvation
@Really_me_101@SameerahMunshi God says in the Final Testament (The Quran) that it is God that "endowed all human beings with dignity." For Muslims, God is still the source of human dignity, but as grace, not anthropomorphism.
@KimIversenShow You don't actually believe this guy was ever Muslim and gave an accurate representation of the faith, do you? As smart as you are, you'll see the plant if you read a second time. As for you conclusion, you would be correct if you added "can" to each statement. Each "can" do such
Our much awaited online course on the Masnawi with Ustadh Feraidoon Mojadedi is now available for pre-order! Learn more and register: https://t.co/HU2dk2GlaC
Watch the trailer: https://t.co/vejuwWGBEG
@osmankhan217@BinhamidAli You've shifted the topic from my contention, but I'll address it. Perhaps it may be that some folks don't find statements of condemnation effective or worthwhile. Water is wet, etc. If that were the case, could our community tolerate that divergence or is it political heresy?
@osmankhan217@BinhamidAli Or one is the foundation of our religion, what makes us an ummah, and leads to eternal consequences, while the other is temporary dunya where we need diversity of thought in order to find solutions? If anything it reveals that religion has been reduced to worldly ideology.
@BinhamidAli Some in community will tolerate theological heresy easily, but will excommunicate with impunity for political heresies. Someone can have beliefs that violate immutable tenets of Islam as long as they are pro such and such a cause, but if devout with diff political calculation...
Whether you are new to Islam or want to freshen up on the basics, join us for a Weekend Intensive with Dr. Asad Tarsin from Sept. 15-17 to reconnect and gain practical knowledge to live the teachings of Islam.
Register here for the Intensive: https://t.co/Ye574j2ctJ
I just read this book, and it is truly a masterpiece. I wish I had had something like this when I started practising and learning about Islam more than a decade ago. It's a really good introduction to Islam.
@McCormickProf@McCormickProf Do you think a joint statement of similar framing by Abrahamic/JudeoChristoIslamic leaders would be feasible or effective? It would be no small feat, I am sure.
@TweetsByBTS It is a result of a neo-Marxist framing. The only ethic is countering the power dynamic between groups. Since "Karen" benefits from the power of her supposed group affiliation, but "Shaniqua" does not, one is considered acceptable, even praiseworthy, but not the other.
@AjmalMuhtaj@DrShadeeElmasry I'm sorry, would you say that Allah ta'ala is gendered? Surely not. Regarding haal, perhaps we should leave those matters to Allah and concern ourselves with our own states.
@AjmalMuhtaj@DrShadeeElmasry Hijacked it? It's a clearly appropriate translation and is directly reflected in the translation. Your emphasis on using He for هو is unusual given that's not what it is referring to here. You claimed that Cleary used "it" as a pronoun for Allah ta'ala, but that's not what he did
@AjmalMuhtaj@DrShadeeElmasry This is from Zamakhshari. I thought I would share it for the benefit of others. "Say, It is God, unique" is consistent with what classical mufassirun said.