Ye had not yet sought yourselves: then did ye find me. now do i bid you lose me and find yourselves; and only when ye have all denied me, will i return to you.
מי שראה את סרטי שר הטבעות בוודאי זוכר את ״עוקץ״ - החרב של בילבו (ושל פרודו), שזוהרת כשיש אורקים בסביבה.
השבוע יצרתי את הגרסה הישראלית - רפליקה מודפסת בתלת מימד, שזוהרת כשיש טילים בסביבה 🚀
The U.S. Air Force continues to execute a high volume of airstrikes into Iran. The two most powerful air forces in the world (🇺🇸+🇮🇱) are dominating the skies over the world’s largest state sponsor of terror.
I'm the guy at the Mossad whose job it is to repeatedly Google the names of our assets before we use them in a false flag, to leave clues for schizophrenics on social media to figure it out. It's hard work but someone's gotta do it!
If you're trying to understand why so many in the West are standing behind Hamas, watch this scene from an HBO series.
A young woman watches native Hawaiians performing a traditional dance for wealthy white tourists. She’s visibly uncomfortable, not with the tourists’ behavior, but with the imbalance of power she believes she's witnessing.
So, in an effort to “make things right,” she encourages one of the Hawaiian men to steal a $75,000 bracelet from a white guest. He declines, saying he doesn't steal. But she insists, “They stole Hawaii from you.”
In this moral framework, right and wrong are not determined by actions, but by which group you belong to, and who is seen as having the historical upper hand.
This is exactly the lens through which Hamas is now being viewed.
It isn’t that these defenders of Hamas are unaware of the atrocities, the hostage-taking, the murder of civilians, the genocidal charter.
It’s that they don’t care.
To them, Hamas is simply the stand-in for every people group they’ve been told was historically wronged.
In that framework, the more brutal the response, the more “authentic” it feels.
The man in the HBO scene, the one who refuses to steal, is actually the one holding the moral high ground.
But in the woke's code of ethics, he’s the problem. He refuses to play his assigned role. In a world where victimhood is a form of currency, he’s rejecting the transaction, and that’s unacceptable to the new priesthood.
This is the moral structure now being projected onto the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
To ask what Hamas actually believes is considered irrelevant. To ask whether civilians should be massacred is inconvenient. The only thing that matters is who represents the “wounded,” and who can be framed as the “privileged.”
From that point forward, no crime is too much, no boundary too sacred.