What kinda jobs ya’ll working that ya’ll are shocked someone is being fired for going viral for emptying a garbage can full of garbage on the street and stealing said garbage can?
Q: Did you post that picture of yourself depicted as Jesus Christ?
TRUMP: I did post it and I thought it was me as a doctor and had to do Red Cross. Only the fake news could come up with that one.
65 games played is kind of random so I would say just set it at 60 games. If you miss more than a quarter of a season, you shouldn’t get anything unfortunately
The NBPA is calling for the 65-game rule to be abolished or reformed to create an exception for significant injures in the case of Cade Cunningham, per @ByTimReynolds
(h/t @BrettSiegelNBA)
43 FTA: No problem
playing the entire 2H in a blowout to stat pad, even when tanking opponent emptied the bench in 4th: No problem
Intentionally fouling while you’re up 30 in 4th quarter, to get more possessions & stat pad is shameless & a disgrace to the game #HeatPonziCulture
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.
And it's making you a worse person because of it.
Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.
That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.
It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.
Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.
The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.
Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.
This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.
Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.
You're right. They're wrong.
Even when the opposite is true.
Hornets have won 6 straight games by 15+ points, the longest streak by any team since the 2017-18 Warriors.
It's tied for the 2nd-longest streak in NBA history.
ht: @Stathead