⚠️IMPORTANT PLS PASS AROUND⚠️
I've seen it a few times now, that Mr Beast crypto currency stuff, and I thought it was a scam the whole time, but now its spreading in discord, which is never a good sign.
If someone close to you dms these images to you, PLEASE make sure
1/3
my boyfriend said he saw an article that at 3pm yesterday every girls school in korea just stopped dead and everyone started crying and that’s so… he really is generational
🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.
And it's making you a worse person because of it.
Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.
That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.
It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.
Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.
The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.
Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.
This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.
Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.
You're right. They're wrong.
Even when the opposite is true.
Namgoong Kyun, the CEO of Humasis and largest shareholder of Fantagio, is currently being heavily investigated for criminal tax evasion. Authorities are currently tearing apart every single company under him to find anything suspicious.
They likely ran into Eunwoo's mom's company and red-flagged it to investigate further. Anyone aware of the issues Eunwoo has endured with Fantagio since 2018 will read his mother's statement and it will make complete sense, because it confirms all the fears we've had for years.
Here is the difference:
Namgoong Kyun is being criminally investigated for tax evasion. Penalty if true: Prison time + heavy fines + criminal record.
Cha Eunwoo is undergoing a standard tax audit that any regular citizen undergoes. Penalty: You just pay the difference in tax. No prison. No criminal record.
He is NOT being criminally investigated even though the headlines want you to think that.
Additionally, you cannot host an international diplomatic event like the APEC Gala while under criminal investigation. The government's vetting process is extreme. If he were actually a tax evader, he would have been blacklisted.
What’s happening now? It’s a dispute over tax brackets. His mom needs to prove her company is a valid business entity eligible for the corporate tax rate rather than the personal rate. If validated, they owe nothing. If rejected, they pay the difference. That’s it.
This witch hunt is forced. Tax audits are standard procedure. NO celebrity is immune.
And ffs can fans please stop saying Eunwoo is too sweet and innocent. I love the man, but he's 29 and we don't know him personally. As a fan I will always hold him accountable for anything I am morally against.
Getting a tax audit is not morally wrong.