@Ave2Brave @lexiii_taylor Lack of contribution, which inevitably was not working. We were dumping money into a can and can’t fill it without the proper contribution of other members- which they weren’t doing, so the agreement is failing and we were wasting our money so we pulled out
@Ave2Brave @lexiii_taylor It’s a non binding agreement, which basically means each county involved has to trust the other members will contribute their share. Nothing is binding them to it. Not all countries are contributing their share. So we were subsidizing other countries to try & make up for their
@kcnotthecity Since the agreement is painfully failing, I would like to use the money to actually improve issues like the environment. Not subsidize other countries who aren’t pulling their weight. But you probably don’t learn about that in your PhD of “getting bitches”
@lexiii_taylor I’m all for improving the environment. That’s not the issue, I’m just saying this specific agreement is a waste of money and will not improve the environment because it is poorly written.
@kcnotthecity You graduated in three years and top of your class with a political science degree? Congratulations, I’m sure you know how much you have to pay attention in class to do that
@lexiii_taylor Which is exactly rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement would be a terrible decision. It has potential if it were a binding law & other countries contributed their fair share, but they aren’t. So we are wasting our money. I’m not going to deflect with a conversation about the wall
Can’t wait to dump billions of dollars into a non binding agreement money pit. All while subsidizing China and giving people false hope this will work without the contribution of other members.
When I had homework due at 11:59 but forgot, so in the middle of the party @ashley_chuck and @velianapetkova helped me break down my bedroom door & filled out my stats homework while I logged into my laptop to submit it 🤣🥺💜