Three kinds of NCR buyers:
The one who bought a flat in 2020 and is still paying EMI on something worth what he paid.
The one who bought YEIDA land in 2020 and hasn't touched it since. 4x in valuation in 6 years.
The one still "researching" in 2026.
Only one of them is actually rich.
Regular degrees are not worth much now & will be worth much less in the future.. Only way ahead is to acquire new knowledge.. and Life-skills.. Theres no future without these.. esp not for the mediocre.. Just scan & buy.. https://t.co/AwjFfWcnsq
मोदी जी के हिंदुत्व पर प्रश्न उठने लगे तो त्रिशूल, त्रिपुंड, डमरू के बाद अब भगवा जैकेट भी निकल आया।
परफॉर्मेटिव हिंदुत्व की पूरी तैयारी है, ताकि लोगों के बीच हिंदू हृदय सम्राट वाला भाव बना रहे।
Its not just Ghaniyo.. I hold the other 2 stooges of Modi equally guilty of crimes by the EC for keeping their mouth shut for so long.. They should have nangafied Ghaniyo in public before media or anyone else.. https://t.co/DditteMCLh
LOL! They want this old spent fossil to throw anything out? As far as Im concerned.. you can bring Batman, Superman & Catwoman also.. but as long as you have that duffer @RahulGandhi as your PM candidate.. @INCIndia is NEVER coming back to power.. NEVER.. https://t.co/zoMJM1K3fN
Text from Class 12 History Textbook (NCERT):
"Drona, a Brahmana, demanded Eklavya's (Nishad, a hunting community boy) thumb"
Qs:
-What do you think this story conveys to Nishads? To Kshatriya?
-Was Drona, as a brahmana, following Dharmashastra?
"Brahminical texts described Mauryas as low origin.
Buddhist texts described them as Kshatriya."
Clearly brahmins are being targeted, Buddhist text is being glorified, hindu texts are refered as "brahminical texts"!
And this is latest 2026-27 print.
Available on NCERT website.
"Razziya Sultan was a great ruler, highly trained in warfare, horsemanship, administration, diplomacy from childhood."
"Meerabai was tortured, oppressed by her in-laws, her guru was a 'dalit'."
-Written in NIOS Gender Studies Textbook from Senior Secondary
(Page 44-45)
The book glorifies Sultana Razia to the fullest. & There is no mention of any social evils of Islam in the paragraph. Sultana Razia comes out as a heroine of very progressive Islamic religion.
On the other hand, Meerabai is shown as oppressed, had to face evils of hindu society, her guru was dalit (this term didn't even exist at the time btw).
Reality?
-Razziya Sultan actually faced many hurdles from muslims, infact the powerful Turkic nobles (Turkan-i-Chehalgani or the Forty Amirs) & Muslim elite vehemently refused to accept a woman as their sovereign.
-Historical evidences show that prime minister (wazir)- Nizamul Mulk Muhammad Junaidi, along with several prominent Turkic provincial governors (including Malik Alauddin Jani & Malik Saifuddin Kuchi), refused to accept her and marched armies against Delhi.
But the NIOS text book doesn't mention any of these.
However, when it comes to Bhakti tradition & Meerabai, the textbook acquires a completely different tone.
Everything is linked to caste, Sati, patriarchy oppression of women. The book says Bhakti tradition led to the emergence of lower castes & women saints. However, this is totally contrary to the truth.
Much before the Bhakti tradition, saints emerged from across all varnas.
-Two greatest saints- Veda Vyasa & Valmiki are from the so-called lower castes.
-At least 27 women seers (Rishikas or Brahmavadinis), including Ghosha, Lopamudra, Gargi, and Maitreyi, are explicitly credited with composing sacred hymns & philosophical debates in the Vedas and Upanishads.
But the NIOS text book completely hides these obvious facts.
Thus the text book cunningly uses Meerabai for it's propaganda. Everything about Meerabai is about oppression, ill-treatment from her relatives & Rajputs.
The book says she accepted Sant Ravidas who was a Dalit as her Guru.
The term "Dalit" did not even exist during Meerabai's time & he had devotees from all sections.
The question also arises as to why the book goes into the identity like Meerabhai was a Rajput & Sant Ravidas is a Dalit, while it did not go into the details of whether Sultana Razia was a Shia or a Sunni or a Syed or a Ansari.
The book did not want Meerabai to be recognized for her gifted skills as it says that Meerabai's poems are not scholarly but only of emotions. The book's objective is to depict Meerabai as oppressed with no talent.
The book says that Meerabai wrote many poems on the ill-treatment she received from her husband while historical accounts say that Prince Bhoj Raj and she had a loving relationship.
When it comes to Meerabai, the text book use many non-definitive terms like "it is believed", "may not be", "seems to have" etc
but when it comes to Sultana Razia, everything about her was definitive, clear.
Why is social identity and oppression foregrounded when discussing Meerabai and Bhakti, but comparable religious and social context is largely absent when discussing Razia Sultan?
Because the book want the Hindu girls to associate Islam with Women's rise to power while Hinduism with caste, patriarchy & oppression.
Any commonsensical person can understand the impact that the above paragraphs would have on Hindu girls 15-16 year old Hindu girls.
It would clearly establish in their minds that Islam is a progressive religion which supports women to rise up while Hinduism, Hindu men, Hindu customs are oppressive which do not allow equal status to women.
Won't such books act as a means to brainwash young children, esp young Hindu girls to hate their religion & culture??
Wonder who wrote such books, how it escaped scrutiny and why it's is still allowed to continue.
@EduMinOfIndia
Please take note.
After the IE nangafied the "3 stooges" of Modi at @ECISVEEP they started singing a different song: "No.. no.. Mohd doesnt have to go to the mountain, the mountain will come to Mohd".. LOL! Such jerks.. with no real rules for the victims of their fraud SIR https://t.co/iUOxXowy9D
पूरा दिन "सरकार हमारी है, लेकिन सिस्टम उनका है" का रोना रोने से अच्छा है, सरकार भी उन्हीं को दे दो!!
कम से कम तुमसे लोग उस चीज़ की उम्मीद तो ना रखें जिसका वादा करके वोट लिया था!!
Some people are saying that the posionous content against Hinduism & GCs were from old NCERT text books and they have changed everything.
Now let's see what NIOS board is teaching the students.
NIOS comes directly under Central Government of India.
Following extract is from page 41 of the NIOS Gender Studies text book, which is currently followed.
It says:
"Vedic texts like Smritis, Dharmasastras and Puranas subjugated women."
It agrees with Rahul Gandhi on Manusmriti.
It says that "women were considered impure in Hinduism."
& All these are taught to our school children.
So what Rahul Gandhi is saying in meetings, Central government is teaching the same to the Hindu students year after year.
If you ask anyone in Mumbai who is the "Hafta Vasooli" party.. They will invariably name "Shiv Sena".. whether the Ooty faction, RajTy faction or Shinto faction.. The entire SS's main business was/is hafta.. https://t.co/HDqOCoT71B
हमें लगा था कि IIT में जो बवाल हुआ उसके बाद सरकार को थोड़ी बहुत लज्जा होगी और कुछ आश्वासन देगी की प्रतिभा का मर्दन ना हो!
बच्चे ना मरें इस मोदी एक्ट के चक्कर में।
NCERT में जो रद्दी पढ़ाई जा रही है सामाजिक न्याय और समाज सुधारकों के नाम पर, विशुद्ध ब्राह्मण घृणा बेची जा रही है, वह अनन्य है! भाजपा नेताओं से ले कर सपा तक, निर्लज्जता से भरे बयान दिए जा रहे हैं।
You blamed Swara Bhaskar on her statement on Jauhar.
But exactly same statement is in our textbooks👇
P.44 NIOS Gender Studies Textbook for Senior Secondary students says:
"Jauhar was an evil practice. It was introduced by Rajput community, which curtailed the liberty & freedom of women."
I am a staunch Hindu, and precisely for that reason I refuse to outsource my Hinduism to the RSS.
Hindu civilisation survived for millennia without a central command, membership card or ideological gatekeeper. Its strength was plurality, debate and the freedom to disagree.
The moment Hindutva becomes an organisational project that decides who is a “real” Hindu, it becomes smaller than Hindu civilisation itself.
My Hinduism predates the RSS, does not require its certification, and certainly does not need a political organisation to make it legitimate.
The Sangh may organise Hindus. It does not own Hinduism.
पूरे NCERT से लग रहा है कि हिंदू शब्द को push out किया जा रहा है। अगर कोई decision लिया भी जा रहा है तो वो बस ब्राह्मणों और ब्राह्मणवाद को निशाना बनाया जा गया है। हर चीज में एक जाति को push किया गया है।
अंबेडकर, ज्योतिबा फुले और ऐसे लोगों का, उनके विचारों का सबसे बड़ा शत्रु था, ब्राह्मण था। उसी संदर्भ में मोदी सरकार और पुस्तकें लिखने और अपडेट करने वाली समिति का vision NCERT पुस्तकों में आसानी से दिख जाएगा।
इसलिए जब मैं कहता हूँ कि भाजपा ने केवल ध्यान नहीं "नहीं" दिया, समझ रहे हैं? बल्कि इन्होंने purposefully शिक्षा व्यवस्था की डैश मार ली है। कायदे से मारी है, मार के चबूतरा बना दिया है।
नेहरू कितना भी बुरा रहा था, लेकिन उसने कभी पेरियार, फूले, अम्बेडकर को मोदी की तरह पूजा नहीं। यहाँ तक कि भीमराव अम्बेडकर को चुनाव तक नहीं जीतने दिया था। भीमराव के सामने अपने एक मामूली सहायक को चुनाव लड़वाकर जिता दिया था। 🤣
नेहरू था तो ब्रांड बंदा! रहता भी हीरो की तरह था! सबको उनकी औकात में रखता था!
इस पोस्ट से जो भी हमारे ब्राह्मण-ठाकुर भाई तिलमिलायें, तो एक बार अपना रुतबा नेहरू राज में देख लेना और एक बार भाजपा राज में अपनी जलालत देख लेना, और दोनों की तुलना जरूर कर लेना, फिर कमेंट करना।
नेहरू अगर फिर से आ जाए और भाजपा के सामने अलग कोई पार्टी बनाकर मैदान में उतरे, तो भाजपा को वो अकेले 2 सीट पर ला देगा।
नेहरू ऐसा बंदा था जो भाजपा की तरह केवल SC-ST-OBC का विकास और सवर्णों का विनाश नहीं, बल्कि देश का चौमुखी विकास कर रहा था।
मोदी उस समय होता, तो मेडिकल कॉलेज, इसरो, टेक्नोलॉजी, मेडिकल स्कूल-कॉलेज नहीं, बल्कि कहीं बाबा साहब भीमराव अम्बेडकर का धाम बनवा रहा होता और SC-ST एक्ट में संशोधन कर रहा होता।
सामान्य वर्ग को नेहरू को गलत नहीं बोलना चाहिए। मोदी और भाजपा के सामने नेहरू की तारीफ करो, ये भाजपाई तिलमिलायेंगे और अपने कुकर्मों के चलते जल्द ही अपनी दुर्गति को प्राप्त होंगे।
बाकी कांग्रेस पार्टी पूरी भाजपा की तरह सवर्ण-विनाशक है। दोनों से GC वर्ग को दूरी बनाकर रखनी है और अपने समाज के साथ रहना है।