@HydraSolver Got it thank you for the clarification. Seems like there are quite a few new solvers coming out lately which is great, just scares me that people may try to take advantage of that to hide from detection of sites. Appreciate the reply ❤️
@DominikNitsche@Nitchares That is good, sorry if I didn’t understand the program fully.
I would happily encourage any solver to implement RTA prevention, I think the GTOw fair play check is a decent system to do so (though of course not a complete fix)
@TylerP_Poker@DominikNitsche I staunchly disagree, preventing RTA use is the shared responsibility of everyone involved (poker sites, the online poker community, and the solver providers)
@abarone68@WSOP@padspoker I’ll come on for a guest lesson: how to min cash with sub 5bb the entire last 4 levels of day 3:
Highlights include not playing a hand for 2 hours and tripling up from 2.8 to 8.4bb with AKo 😂
@VanjaPoker Linus is undebatable goat in terms of skill, not sure that quitting a good lineup is a factor one way or another though? If anything I’d argue it’s bad game selection
@tombos21 I guess, but then the incentive isn’t really driving the solver’s decision making right? I would be very interested, for example: SB v BTN 3bp, K74r sb b50 range, turn 2bdfd, what hands will solver bet to “prevent being bluffed”? …
@tombos21 Hey Tombos, big fan of your tweets but I’m not sure this is true (or maybe it’s just rephrasing the same concept), solver will often bet in various spots to deny equity, but I’m not sure that that’s distinct from “betting to fold out trash that would have bluffed you”