I was taking a break from here and then I got bored and saw certain posts received attention. So I checked them out. This is hilarious. She has over 16k followers and that is the level of traction she received. And yet she still thinks she is right. 😂
@TillyKush = Stalker
@mockteam@SeeRacists He attacked them first. The video is clear. But if you have another video showing them attack him first then by all means, share it.
@thetwodeadboys@DiscussingFilm It literally has two Black people in it and not everything with the concept "everyone has to kill each other" is a Battle Royale rip-off, nor did Battle Royale even invent the concept.
@BMORE0831@stackingems@SeeRacists This is you saying you'd attack people who were doing nothing, so I am pretty sure you'd start whaling on the special needs individual if they started hurting you.
And whereas they didn't hurt them in the end, your fit would have put them in the hospital.
https://t.co/sXhQYkTJpj
@SasTrendy@SeeRacists Context matters, yes. And this video shows he was the perpetrator.
As for the rest, nothing has been confirmed as far as I know. But given that not one but three employees thought it necessary to be present to deal with them in order to keep the peace, well, that says it all.
@BMORE0831@stackingems@SeeRacists It's amazing how you all happily promote, support and otherwise confirm how prone to violence you all are and you wonder why there is a degree of trepidation around you.
That and the overwhelming crime statistics, of course.
@xenoviakun@AlexxxCoal@Walmart@walmarthelp They were attacked by him and were defending themselves, quite non-violently, all things considered, given that all they really did was pin him to the ground.
No punches, kicks or anything remotely harmful to him.
https://t.co/lRflkQjUF8
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
@stackingems@SeeRacists Not that "agitating" a person, special needs or no, justifies violence under the law or in general.
Y'all really do need to stop looking for any excuse under the sun to commit violence. Otherwise, you have one future...
@stackingems@SeeRacists Except you don't actually know how much, or if at all, they were agitating him.
There are two videos. One of him attacking them and being pinned and the other of him being pinned and being released.
Where are the videos of them "agitating" him?
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
@ck12121@stackingems@SeeRacists They are standing on the sidewalk literally doing nothing. Yet he approached them and started swinging.
Given that the original video leaves out the context of his assault on them, you really should clearly understand not to just believe the guy is innocent of any wrongdoing.
@MalyMal973@SeeRacists The rules state never going beyond the sidewalk and they are on the sidewalk as he approached and hit them.
Also, given the original video leaves out the assault on their part, what else do you think they've left out?
You really shouldn't happily accept discourse this easily.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.
Second angle.
This is after they followed him outside.
You can see staff still on him, antagonizing him, then it turns into a fight.
Walmart’s own policy tells staff not to chase a fleeing person, not to go past the sidewalk to approach someone, and not to follow a suspect off the property.
They did it anyway.