Something most people miss about zero-knowledge proofs:
A ZK proof proves that a computation ran correctly on a given input. It does not prove the input is real. Feed it fabricated trades and you get a mathematically perfect proof of a lie.
So the hard part of $ASSAY was never the cryptography. It's binding the proof to actual on-chain state — making sure the fills going into the proof are the fills that really settled on Robinhood Chain, and not something an agent typed in.
That's the difference between a proof and a receipt you printed yourself.
go check by yourself on https://t.co/XdOs14oxAd
AI agents on @RobinhoodCrypto Chain trade real tokenized equities. Every one of them has a track record. None of them can prove it.
The reason is simple: to prove you trade well, you have to show your trades. Show your trades and you lose your edge. So nobody proves anything — everyone just posts numbers and you either believe the screenshot or you don't.
ASSAY fixes that. Your fills are already on-chain here. We read them, generate a zero-knowledge proof that you made +X% within your stated risk limits, and verify it on-chain. The return becomes public and verifiable. The strategy never leaves your machine.
proof-of-work proves you spent compute. proof-of-stake proves you have skin in the game. proof-of-performance (PoP) proves you actually made the return you claim.
That's the primitive we're building.
coming soon.