Enkidu

[Enkidu @assbob69]

@Sverrirhelga95 fer með vini og vandamenn í vettvangsferðir þangað…trúir manni ekki fyrr en það sér þetta með eigin augum

[Hávamál @havamal23]

Það hlaðast upp frásagnir sem innlendir fjölmiðlar þegja yfir, segja ekki að fullu frá.

Hvort sem eru atvik erlendis eða hérlendis, árásir innflytjenda eru að aukast og það er skipulögð þöggun.

Fjömiðlar halda okkur óupplýstum, verja glæpamennina sem eru að ráðast á Íslendinga.

[Dr. LoginTermInfo @LoginTerm]

Breskur aðalsmaður, á Indlandi (1876).

[Lucy White @lucyjaynewhite1]

Printed on The Telegraph’s front cover today:

“Should white people really stop having children?”

Why is The Telegraph printing genocidal language & putting it on their front page? Absolutely disgusting.

Also notice the lower case ‘white’.

Just 2 days ago, they did a hit piece on us for wanting to reverse mass migration.

All very telling… we know why.

[Árni Magnússon Aficionado🇮🇸 🇬🇧 @ArniMagnusarafi]

@peningademantar Langhúsnæðismálaráðherra að spúa hatri gagnvart viðkvæmum ungum mönnum fyrir hönd erlendra hryðjuverkamanna.

[Cernovich @Cernovich]

We can't rule them, because that's colonization. If we don't feed them, it's murder. Nietzsche himself could not have ever foreseen this level of "white guilt" and slave morality.

[Enkidu @assbob69]

@kringur Bad take

[555-blinker @RimmuG]

Ég hef ekki áhyggjur af því að samfélag manna sem beitir 17 ára stráka hópofbeldi verði fyrir fordómum.
Þeir eiga verra skilið en bara fordóma. Miklu verra.

[Rothmus 🏴 @Rothmus]

Nobody voted for this.

The same supranational elites shouting “save our democracy” are ramming through a globalist agenda of open borders, mass amnesty, and demographic replacement that no European population ever approved.

Because to them, democracy never meant rule of the people. It means their rule. No different than North Korea claiming to be democratic because the dictator supposedly speaks for the will of the people.

You’re only allowed to vote on trivial issues. The decisions that actually destroy a civilization like who enters your country, what your culture becomes, whether your nation even survives, it all happens without your consent.

You’re not in charge. You’re being ruled.

[Lars Andersen @LarsAnders1620]

Maskerede betjente uden kendelse smadrer min dør pga yndlingstals- og journalisme-kriminalitet.

I morges kl 0947, da jeg var på vej i bad hørte jeg først ét højt brag. Derefter kiggede jeg i dørspionen og så en gruppe sortklædte og maskerede mænd (mundbind og mørke solbriller) på vej op af trappen.

De begyndte straks at hamre på lejlighedens dør med en rambuk uden på noget tidspunkt at ringe på eller give sig til kende.

Kort efter var de inde i lejligheden (det er ca. her videoen starter) og de lagde mig promte i håndjern.

Næsten alle 8-10 betjente var iført mundbind og mørke briller - helt klart maskering som højst sandsynligt er ulovligt.

De kunne ikke fremvise nogen kendelse og ville ikke sige, hvad jeg var sigtet for. "Det ville tilgå".

Lejlighedens overvågning blev herefter pillet ned af betjentene af "sikkerhedsmæssige hensyn".

Kort efter blev jeg kørt på Bellahøj Politistation, mens lejligheden blev endevendt.

Her blev jeg fotograferet, rullet fingeraftryk og DNA skrabet - uagtet at politiet har det hele i forvejen.

Først til sidst (ved 16 tiden) blev jeg informeret om, hvad jeg var sigtet for: at have det forkerte yndlingstal og at forsøge at interviewe statsministeren om afviklingen af danskernes privatliv gennem forbud mod kryptering og permanent PET-overvågning af alle danskere.

Jeg blev løsladt kl 1640 og kunne begive mig hjem til fods.

Selve anholdelsen betragter jeg som ulovlig. Man må ikke anholde til afhøring - det følger af retsplejelovens paragraf 750. De har allerede både fingeraftryk, foto og DNA - og sagen har intet som helst at gøre med fysiske spor.

Det er også stærkt tvivlsomt, om den helt uvarslede smadring af døren har levet op til proportionalitetsprincippet i dansk ret. Jeg har simpelthen svært ved at se, hvordan nogle opslag på nettet kan retfærdiggøre det. Beviset er opslagene - ikke noget i lejligheden. Det virker mere som ren straf uden fagligt belæg.

Jeg er også ret sikker på, at politiet har tiltvunget sig adgang til min kærestes telefon og derigennem slettet størstedelen af den optagede video. For der gik et par minutter, før de tog kameraerne ned (og tog dem med(!)).

Hvorfor nedenstående video som den eneste ikke blev slettet, ved jeg ikke.

Jeg har det godt, men er en anelse chokeret over politiets helt uproportionale og brutale fremfærd.

[David Hines @hradzka]

“What do you call 100,000 dead Canadians? A good start!”

“Whoa whoa whoa that’s joke’s hate speech!”

“What? No, I’m Canadian, that’s official government policy.”

[GB Politics @GBPolitcs]

🚨NEW: The rape gang inquiry, carried out by Rupert Lowe, mentions the NHS recording genital injuries, STIs, and pregnancies in children as young as 11, then discharging them back to their abusers the same night

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The year is 1949.

The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain.

The year is 1956.

Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over.

The year is 1966.

A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots.

The year is 1979.

Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005.

The year is 1985.

Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning.

The year is 1992.

There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with.

So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now.

Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one.

It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.

[Sverrir @Sverrirhelga95]

sjáið muninn á því hvernig er fjallað um þessi mótmæli í belfast og svo BLM mótmælin á sínum tíma. þetta er ekki óvart, þetta er gert í skoðanamyndandi tilgangi

[Gerti @Gerti1122]

Ef hann er Íslendingur, af hverju eru hótanirnar þá á ensku?

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

A social media post by the Father of a young man who threw a traffic cone during the Southampton protests

He is facing 3-5 years in prison

He calls it a 'kangaroo court'

Rapists and paedophiles get less time in prison

[Dandy @Dandyist]

What we have discovered after the mass adoption of police body cameras is that the often maligned American police are actually trying their best to avoid shooting people, and that celebrated British police are violent sociopaths who relish in the opportunity to hurt innocents

[Cernovich @Cernovich]

“Your punishment for having a knife when they searched you would be very different from the thief’s. For him to have a knife was mere misbehavior, tradition, he didn’t know any better. But for you to have one was ‘terrorism.’” -Alexander Solzhenitsyn

[Hávamál @havamal23]

Þegar samfélag normaliserar ,,umburðarlyndi” fyrir ÖLLU þmt. kynferðislegri frávikahegðun þá þýðir það bókstaflega að skólar og starfsmenn forðast að ,,fordæma” allskonar hegðun, af ótta við að útskúfun eða að vera stimplaðir sem hatursfullir

Setur börn í aukna áhættu