I don't really have a DNI, but I do have a (probably longer than necessary) list of stances I'm not going to change my mind on.
https://t.co/aWhdIsAHuC
once you start insulting, threatening, calling down punishment, pushing for real life detrimental action, telling people to self-harm, *then* I'm bothered, but that's outside the realm of *just* feelings.
look I just do not care how people *feel* about fictional ships of any kind as long as they remain feelings and are not hurting real people. sorry, but I just don't have the time, energy, or mental capacity to litigate what's going on in someone's head.
especially in smut, which, lbr, is what most of this discourse is actually about, which is why it's funny when people are like "it's about putting women in your fanfic!!" okay where am I putting the women in the bed and do they really want to be there.
your reminder that you are absolutely allowed to hate m/m but you still don't get to call the shippers misogynist or imply that they need to *stop* writing fic just because the numbers on AO3 aren't what you want them to be
some people are getting heated in the QRTS so: by "hate m/m" I do in fact mean that some people will, for their own reasons, not enjoy fictional content about m/m to the point of avoiding it, and I will take that as a personal preference and move on.
@gfviktor character limit issues. some people do not like m/m fic, for their own reasons. I don't know those reasons, so I'm not about to judge people for preferences in their fictional content.
the only way censorship can succeed is if it's done with the biggest brush possible, because to allow any exceptions allows thought and discussion on the topic, and that's the last thing censors want because then you might start questioning the censorship
to be momentarily bitter, I sure hope all those "secret third thing" adults with a job are looking forward to all the inconvenience and censorship of an internet made safe for kids by assuming literally no-one can be trusted with fictional content for adults
you might not have known this is what you wanted, but this is what you wanted. now everything is safe and no-one can be hurt by fictional content- as decided by conservatives and radfems, which is exactly what people were warning you would happen
@lizcourserants at this point, I'm pretty sure op's just the kind of person who gets something out of negative attention, so like... also, I hope people just stop feeding the troll.
plus the implication is that consent and autonomy are sometimes optional, drives me up the wall.
I do not want consent to be treated as optional, thanks. what even are rapists gonna learn, that they were correct to think consent is irrelevant?
Please stop saying that "rapists deserve to be raped" because you're unknowingly pushing the idea that rape can be accepted circumstantially, like as a reasonable punishment, which is actually what contributes to people being raped in the first place
yes I am insufferable and preaching to the choir but man, I'm already depressed and the future of any art is looking kinda bleakly like "eventually we'll just even skip the facade and all entertainment will be An AI-Generated Conglomerate Synopsis"
the end result of treating art as a kind of cultural commodity is that the art itself and engaging with art becomes worthless. All that's left is the bite-size trivia and the financial value.
and the artist becomes pointless- which is a feature, not a bug, because techbros don't like it when people have values that are not Technological Progress At All Costs