"The British Medical Association (BMA), representing over 200,000 UK doctors, has voted to reject the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-semitism within the National Health Service (NHS)."
Please RT this as the UK media won't inform the public
Thank you, Tommy Robinson!
Tommy Robinson is a controversial and far-right political figure in the United Kingdom, known for his strong anti-Islam stance. His real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, and he is the founder of the "English Defence League." He is widely recognized for his hardline views on immigration and Islam.
He once appealed to British people on social media to read the Qur’an in order to develop hatred toward Islam.
However, one of his followers, a British citizen named Christos Onassis, decided to act on that suggestion and began reading the Qur’an. But as he continued reading, his perception began to change completely. Instead of hatred, he felt a growing attraction toward Islam. Eventually, he embraced Islam, testified the Shahadah, and changed his name to "Abdul Bari."
Later, he wrote on social media:
"Thank you, Tommy!"
"I started reading the Qur’an after seeing Tommy Robinson’s tweets, and as a result, I ended up reciting the Shahadah on Sunday. Tommy is misguided about Islam and intends to spread hatred, but reading the Qur’an made me realize the truth."
He concluded by saying:
"All praise is due to Allah for blessing me with Islam."
🗣️Revert:
“I was brainwashed into being a Muslim. Brainwashed into charity, respecting my parents, feeding the poor, taking responsibility for my mistakes, praying for others….”
Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain know it’s almost impossible to abolish the asylum system due to various UK and international laws.
There are zero countries in the world that have abolished the asylum system.
It’s a shame their idiotic supporters believe them.
Insha Mushtaq an innocent 14 yo kashmiri child opened her window in 2016, got hit with pellets and lost her eyes forever. This is "Limited damage". Everyone whos a part of this dehumanising propaganda movie should be ashamed of themselves.
@jiostudios@ajaydevgn
ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan blew the lid off Trump and Netanyahu 🔥👏
Khan: "They threatened ICC judges, UN staff, and my family over Israel cases.
🇺🇸 12 U.S. senators sent a letter saying 'Go after 🇮🇱 Israel and we go after you and your family.
Then came sanctions, frozen accounts, travel bans. It is deeply dangerous for states to bully international justice."
Finally someone said this. What a COURAGE this man has 💪 🫡
Islam doesn't have income tax. You receive your full income and pay 2.5% on your annual surplus unused wealth and savings (after meeting basic living expenses).
This is distributed to eight categories including the poor, needy, debt-ridden, and in the cause of Allah (welfare/education/defence & aid).
Terrifying Sharia law!
Over 5,000 people showed up in Edinburgh today to show opposition to Islamophobia and the far right.
The protests follow the recent stabbing attack which targeted five Muslims last week.
Baroness Gohir at the House of Lords.
“Muslims are terrified and do not feel safe” - in the UK
Sadly she’s right. Britain is unrecognisable. We need action not words.
I don’t care who it is I don’t care where they come from whether it’s domestic or foreign.
Anybody and I mean anybody who grooms or sexually abuses/exploits children does not deserve to carry on breathing.
Two heroic men run in to burning fire to rescue pensioners and their grandson. Ih wait, cameras down, move on. Nothing to report here ... they're both Muslims.
Two British Muslim men pulled an elderly couple and their grandson from a burning house in Leeds on Friday.
Mohsin Qayyum, 22, and Mohammed Yusuf Iqbal, 20, were driving past when they saw the blaze.
Without a thought for themselves they ran straight in and rescued the people.
Birmingham is hosting a Somalian festival for the Muslim Somalian community.
The library and council building will turn blue and white, which are the colours of the Somalian flag.
Fact-check: No credible reports show India offering to “retire” the Indus Waters Treaty in exchange for Pakistan reopening its airspace to Indian flights.
The claim appears to be false or misunderstood. Here’s the real situation and why such a deal would be terrible for Pakistan anyway.
What actually happened in 2025:
After the alleged Pahalgam terror attack, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) as retaliation. Pakistan responded by closing its airspace to Indian airlines (and India did the same to Pakistani flights).
Ties remain frozen as of June 2026. No such “water-for-airspace” bargain was offered.
Quick reminder on the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty:
* Pakistan gets ~80% of the total Indus river system waters (western rivers: Indus, Jhelum, Chenab).
* India gets ~20% (eastern rivers).
This treaty has been Pakistan’s lifeline for 65+ years.
Why the IWT is existential for Pakistan:
* It irrigates 80-90% of Pakistan’s farmland.
* Supports agriculture (huge share of GDP & exports like cotton).
* Powers major hydropower plants.
* Supplies water to major cities.
Losing treaty protections would let India build storage dams and divert more water → serious shortages for crops, food security, and the economy.
Long-term impact if the IWT is fully scrapped or stays suspended:
* Potential 20%+ drop in water flows to Pakistan.
* Big hit to agriculture, hydropower & exports.
* Risks of food insecurity and economic damage for a population of 240+ million.
Water is not a bargaining chip — it’s survival.
Now the airspace part:
Pakistan currently loses significant overflight revenue by keeping Indian flights out (hundreds of crores in just months in 2025).
Reopening would bring back some fees for Pakistan and save Indian airlines time & fuel. It’s useful economically — but minor and reversible compared to water.
So would “IWT for airspace” be a good bargain for Pakistan?
No. Absolutely not.
Trading away water security (existential) for overflight revenue and minor diplomatic optics would be a massive strategic loss. Pakistan would be giving India permanent leverage while gaining something temporary and secondary.
Bottom line:
The rumored deal doesn’t exist. Even if it did, Pakistan should reject it outright.
Water is non-negotiable. Both countries would be better off pursuing serious diplomacy on the IWT and treating airspace as a lower-stakes confidence-building measure.
What do you think �� is water security worth any airspace concession?
#IndusWatersTreaty #IndiaPakistan #Geopolitics
Indus Waters for Airspace? A Deal Pakistan Must Reject
Fact-check: No credible reports show India offering to “retire” the Indus Waters Treaty in exchange for Pakistan reopening its airspace to Indian flights.
The claim appears to be false or misunderstood. Here’s the real situation and why such a deal would be terrible for Pakistan anyway.
What actually happened in 2025:
After the alleged Pahalgam terror attack, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) as retaliation. Pakistan responded by closing its airspace to Indian airlines (and India did the same to Pakistani flights).
Ties remain frozen as of June 2026. No such “water-for-airspace” bargain was offered.
Quick reminder on the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty:
* Pakistan gets ~80% of the total Indus river system waters (western rivers: Indus, Jhelum, Chenab).
* India gets ~20% (eastern rivers).
This treaty has been Pakistan’s lifeline for 65+ years.
Why the IWT is existential for Pakistan:
* It irrigates 80-90% of Pakistan’s farmland.
* Supports agriculture (huge share of GDP & exports like cotton).
* Powers major hydropower plants.
* Supplies water to major cities.
Losing treaty protections would let India build storage dams and divert more water → serious shortages for crops, food security, and the economy.
Long-term impact if the IWT is fully scrapped or stays suspended:
* Potential 20%+ drop in water flows to Pakistan.
* Big hit to agriculture, hydropower & exports.
* Risks of food insecurity and economic damage for a population of 240+ million.
Water is not a bargaining chip — it’s survival.
Now the airspace part:
Pakistan currently loses significant overflight revenue by keeping Indian flights out (hundreds of crores in just months in 2025).
Reopening would bring back some fees for Pakistan and save Indian airlines time & fuel. It’s useful economically — but minor and reversible compared to water.
So would “IWT for airspace” be a good bargain for Pakistan?
No. Absolutely not.
Trading away water security (existential) for overflight revenue and minor diplomatic optics would be a massive strategic loss. Pakistan would be giving India permanent leverage while gaining something temporary and secondary.
Bottom line:
The rumored deal doesn’t exist. Even if it did, Pakistan should reject it outright.
Water is non-negotiable. Both countries would be better off pursuing serious diplomacy on the IWT and treating airspace as a lower-stakes confidence-building measure.
What do you think — is water security worth any airspace concession?
#IndusWatersTreaty #IndiaPakistan #Geopolitics
There is nothing so monstrous or cowardly Field Marshal Asim Munir as a man in uniform punishing a woman because of whom she married. The innocent wife of former PM Imran Khan is being subjected to severe mental & physical torture while illegally held in jail for almost 800 days, under direct orders of Munir. Little wonder his mental capacity is being questioned. Release Bushra and @ImranKhanPTI now!
@GretaThunberg@yvonneridley
@Cortes This is fiction dressed up as insider knowledge and not even particularly convincing fiction at that.
Where is the evidence? Not a single verifiable statistic. Not one named source. Just the same tired tropes recycled for an audience that wants to believe them.
The claim that Pakistanis as a community don't recognise these characterisations isn't just defensive — it's factual. Because these aren't descriptions of a people. They're caricatures drawn by those who've never spent meaningful time with one.
And here's the pattern worth noticing: this view of Islam, reductionist, essentialist, stripped of all nuance, is exactly the version peddled by Hindutva ideologues and Zionist propagandists. Two faces of the same coin. Both need Muslims to be a monolithic threat. Both profit from dehumanisation.
As for the man himself? I'd go further than questioning his credentials. He's fool’s gold for your echo chamber; someone's useful idiot, trotted out to say the quiet part out loud so others can maintain plausible deniability.
The tragedy is that people will share this without ever asking: who benefits from this narrative? And why does it always sound the same, no matter who's saying it?
Een Britse Pakistani insider legt uit wat voor type Pakistani’s de UK binnenkreeg via immigratie en waarom het leidde tot rape gangs en neef-nicht huwelijken (MSM zou zo iemand ‘expert’ noemen maar alleen als het in hun straatje past)