Mama

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 Interesting how you believe in your premises based on "feels".
The universe "feels" designed. The universe "feels" fine tuned. When you reject other positions based on feels, that's an argument from personal incredulity.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 None of that has to do with psychology.

Either way, your premise is wrong.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 No thanks. That's not my fault.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 Intelligent design? Where? Biological beings? Holy shit what a stupid designer it must be if these things are the best it could do.

My ingrown toenails, poor vision, and now removed appendix would like a word.

If this is what intelligence looks like to you, it makes sense.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 https://t.co/yhmNt91mWc

apologies, the link wasnt working

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 https://t.co/2agqhs3SSj…

38:25 to 48:30 if the link doesn't take you to the right place.

and just like that, your whole argument is now demolished.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@KingHerzog1 @NotEvolution1 When a thing we can interact with "begins to exist" what is really happening is material is altering to take a new form. The beginning of a contingent thing's existence is the same as the moment the material which happens to form the object took the form it is in.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@trevorhernxndez @trad_rebel @LibertyCappy I already am blessed, you can keep your blessings to yourself

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@NotEvolution1 I trust it's trivially obvious why this is so. Without time, there's no subsequent or change. Without space, there's no place for the things we're discussing.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@NotEvolution1 do you disagree that causation is only applicable in the context of spacetime?

When we're talking about causation, we're talking about things changing subsequent to, and resultant from, other things.

This requires spacetime. (See things, changing, subsequent, and other things.-

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@GenZCrusaders @trad_rebel @LibertyCappy Sorry that I dont want to tie my life to a man. I actually get to support myself and not depend on someone else while I travel the world and make meaningful connections. Any woman I see with a husband and kids are usually miserable, and if they're not it is very rare.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@trad_rebel @LibertyCappy Sorry that I dont want to tie my life to a man. I actually get to support myself and not depend on someone else while I travel the world and make meaningful connections. Any woman I see with a husband and kids are usually miserable, and if they're not it is very rare.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@_Ancient_Way_ @NotEvolution1 Proper abductive reasoning would never place a supernatural explanation as being more probable than something occurring even by random chance.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@NotEvolution1 No, science is about admitting what you don't know. Religion is about putting god into those gaps and calling it "evidence".

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@AgainstAtheismX If this is a question being asked in good faith, then I don’t know for certain what’s widely considered to be the best argument against the existence of God, but the only argument for or against that I find to be persuasive on its own is the problem of evil.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@FBoy831 @MaoistFeminist @AgainstAtheismX Damn.... what a trainwreck you are. you need help🤣 I can tell you're slipping... the reason I give you the same energy back is so you realize how INSANE christians are.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@FBoy831 @MaoistFeminist @AgainstAtheismX All you people are is sheep who cant think for themselves 🤣

The bible is bullshit my dear. Its time you stop believing in fairytales, and then maybe you wont look like this:

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@FBoy831 @MaoistFeminist @AgainstAtheismX it didnt, you moron. It does not address the fact that god could have prevented the deaths of infants, but instead chose to raise the murder tally.

If you think that it was fine because they're "all going to heaven", is that a good excuse for murdering babies today? No, its not.

[Mama @atheistbrat]

@FBoy831 @MaoistFeminist @AgainstAtheismX yes...??? and it literally has nothing to do with my point