@ExtendBill @CK_2128 @PhoenixMaximus2@PatMcAfeeShow That is a horrible comparison. It was a heads up play that was relatively safe. Things can always go wrong. He weight his chances. Throwing into triple coverage is just asking for trouble.
@TeufelHundSC2 @ElPredestinato I think race starts should count as a different stat. Different strategy definitely not though, it can always be a footnote lol
@HonestF1er @formularacers_ Again, he had a better season then Leclerc. This wasn't a good season for him, even though lots of it wasn't his own fault. I'll gladly have a discussion about Albon and Sainz, the latter had a great season, but did ultimately get beaten by Leclerc.
@Fury066_@29awbs@formularacers_ He literally admitted in Monaco that he got the absolute most out of the car. He can't control Max putting in an all-timer in qualies.
@ImNotBekim Ocon won by sheer luck that Bottas went bowling. He was at the right place at the right time and wouldn't have won without Alonso's help. No chance at all that the AM could've touched the RB at any point without any form of luck.
@Fury066_@29awbs@formularacers_ Which one? The Aston Martin was second fastest at some races this year, but was never close to actually matching RB. Alpine's win in 21 was sheer luck that Bottas went bowling and took out half of the field, Ocon finally won only because of Alonso's help.