atimerz

reply spam acc

[atimerz @atimerz]

@QUEIRD0 Isn’t this aegoromantic? https://t.co/RHJoDsx9u4

[atimerz @atimerz]

@sugarbeezy_ The terms non men/women have racist origins
Queer attraction to women/men is a better definition imo

[atimerz @atimerz]

@Chaipuccin0 Incest ship and their ship name is a slur mind you

[atimerz @atimerz]

@scisetpiled I agree but also a lot of people in this fandom really can’t comprehend a butch4butch ship

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie No it’s bisexual but also describes the specific feeling of being both wlw and mlm as a multi gendered person
I agree calling it gaybian is dumb I think sapphilean would clear up the confusion more

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie I do agree the name is problematic, it should be called sapphilean instead, but by your logic aren’t pansexual and omnisexual also offensive to bisexuals because they all describe attraction to all genders just more specifically

[atimerz @atimerz]

@millajejej https://t.co/JNENeZmLY8

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie Most bisexuals don’t experience both sapphic and achillean attraction at the same time

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie Most bisexuals don’t experience both sapphic and achillean attraction at the same time

[atimerz @atimerz]

@smiskidean @_mollycoddles It’s under the bisexual umbrella but describes a more specific way multigender people might experience it

[atimerz @atimerz]

@smiskidean @_mollycoddles Someone who’s sapphic (women attracted to women) and achillean (men attracted to men) at the same time due to being genderfluid or bigender

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie It’s under the bisexual umbrella but more specific

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie Well no because not all nonbinary people would describe their attraction that way

[atimerz @atimerz]

@imfruitflip Yes it’s a more specific term for how multigender people experience attraction

[atimerz @atimerz]

@ST4RV3S How is someone only exclusively attracted to binary men and women when nonbinary is such a broad spectrum? Every sexuality is going to include at least some nonbinary people

[atimerz @atimerz]

@imfruitflip https://t.co/y1tPM1wWWm

[atimerz @atimerz]

@rowdyrohannie They’re genderfluid/bigender and their attraction to women is sapphic/wlw while their attraction to men is achelian/mlm what’s so confusing?

[atimerz @atimerz]

@Aikrinaa @rowdyrohannie I agree, the term should be sapphilian instead, I think that would clear up a lot of the confusion

[atimerz @atimerz]

I think a lot of the confusion around this would be eliminated if it said sapphic/achellian attraction instead of lesbian and gay and specified it’s for multigender people cuz this makes perfect sense to me it’s just the wording is a bit awkward

[atimerz @atimerz]

@FlexBeef Nonbinary is such a broad and nuanced spectrum all sexualities are going to include at least some nonbinary people