BUIDL CTC 2026 Fall winners are in!
1st: Farebox
2nd: Comacard
3rd: Precedence
These teams stood out amongst 237 total projects with key highlights:
🐧 Attestcoin Protocol was built into the core of the product
🐧 Products addressing real world pains
Congrats to the winners!
A lot of cross-chain pain is because somebody held the keys or the assets. We all know how that ends.
We don't hold either.
We carry proof about other chains, with Attestors bonded against lying about the facts.
📠 only
At the CTC Ignition event, I'm gonna talk about 'continuity proof'. Every attestation we sign carries a fingerprint of the last one, back to a registered genesis. Gap the middle and later proofs won't line up.
If you're building on @Creditcoin and reading Ethereum through Attestcoin, we take away "trust us bro" and give you, "yep, checks out!"
Most cross-chain protocols ask you to trust a committee's signature that an event happened.
Attestcoin proves it against the chain's entire history, back to genesis.
Shall we talk about continuity proof? 🧵
Have questions? Join the Creditcoin Discord and the BUIDL CTC channels - our team is there to answer your technical Qs.
Ready to BUIDL? Hop over to DoraHacks
https://t.co/zyf6apbHbR
Readability attestations use BLS signature aggregation.
2/3+1 of Attestors sign, the signatures collapse into one aggregate, and @Creditcoin runs a single verification check.
Cost stays constant no matter how large the attestor set grows.
Writability works differently.
Those signatures are ordinary ECDSA, checked one by one at the destination Inbox, so cost scales with attestor count.
BLS is less gas-efficient at small set sizes, that's the tradeoff.
The Inbox can add a BLS verifier later as the set grows.