@leodddd I was indeed referring to that one, my sincere apologies for the confusion. To reiterate, my points of contention with your original reply are that I do not see how it would track with the intended meaning and that I ultimately disagree with Toby changing it on principle.
It was testy at the time but Toby should have just kept the rose imagery in chapter 4 and not remove it the moment someone understandably called it a rape metaphor.
I really don’t think you can make truly meaningful art without being some kind of pervert. not like in an explicitly sexual way, but there’s a degree of near obsessive fanaticism behind all the profoundly cool shit out there
@leodddd But why even argue the matter of intent when applying the imagery to the "intended" meaning makes no sense, why THAT out of all possible animations. You need to contend with this idea or otherwise you argue that Toby has no idea what he puts into his literal dream game.