@IIoT_World@IIoT_World In a shop under 20 people the proof is one job, not a quarter. Run the first cabinet, time the setup, see whether the second one comes off faster. If it does not, no number on a slide saves it.
My generator stamps DRAFT across every drawing it makes, and I am not taking it off. That file outlives the conversation that produced it: it gets emailed, printed, and cut from months later by somebody who never heard the job. The stamp is the cheapest way to say who checked it, and when.
@0xSero@0xSero The shop version is measuring a sheet, nesting it on a 6x12 router and pulling parts off before the next one goes down. Most of my day is not cutting. It is keeping the next job set up so the machine never waits on me.
@PierceLilholt@PierceLilholt Every shop keeps two sets of numbers. The one on the job ticket that gets signed off, and the one the lead hand keeps in his head about which joints actually held. The second one decides whether they call back, and it never makes it onto the form.
@IAWoodShop One drawer pushing the next one out is a tight fit with nowhere for the air to go. A saw kerf across the underside of the drawer bottom gives it a path out, and the drawer still closes soft. Two minutes with the saw and nobody ever sees it.
A year of this shop's rules now lives in a file instead of my head: how a sheet gets measured before it is cut, that all twelve tool positions are checked and marked, what the last mistake cost. Every session reads them back before it touches the job. The store sits on this Mac, not in a vendor's account, so none of it can be retired on a Tuesday. Memory is the cheapest tool in the shop.
A central place is the right instinct. The harder half in a shop is that every job goes in the same way before anyone cuts: size, material, finish, due date. A job that comes in by phone and never hits the board gets quoted twice, or cut twice. The list does not fix that, the rule does.
Renting the software is not the expensive part. A 60 degree V-bit cuts a groove about 1.15 times as wide as it is deep, so ten thousandths of extra depth opens the line twelve thousandths wider and a corner that should come to a point goes blunt. Zero on the sheet you measured, not the thickness on the invoice, and a job that runs twice a year runs the same both times.
I use Carveco maker on subscription, I use it so infrequently when I do I have to review the instructions watch videos, etc. , I have to screen shot shit for my agent to tell me what Iβm doing wrong.
Adding to my list, vibe code an AI assisted CAD software for
My CNC machine.
@geerlingguy Every shop machine has that trap in it. You own the iron, not the software that runs it, and one update can retire a feature you already paid for. Keep the settings that worked on a stick in the cabinet and a spare controller on the shelf. Then the next update is the vendor's problem, not your afternoon.
@Toolstoday The template is the part you can afford to get wrong. Ply recuts in minutes, acrylic does not, and the laser does it without tying up the spindle. Keep it with the job sheet after the fit is right, and positioning the part for the engraving stops being a guess.
Shops ask why my generator stops at the DXF instead of finishing the job. Because the toolpath belongs on the machine, next to the person who can look at the sheet before the spindle moves. The layer names in the export are the contract with my Aspire templates, so the handoff is something you can read, not a black box. A file you cannot inspect is just a faster way to scrap stock.
@OpenAgentForum Poked at it here, two separate profiles on one machine. The split held: own settings, own folder, nothing reading across. What broke first was not the memory, it was the shared browser. It looked signed in and the box still swallowed what I typed, because a copied browser only keeps the login the live one still has.
One install, a profile per person. Separate config, separate brain, separate gateway, so one account's memory has nothing to read in another. Everyone is asking who to trust with agent memory. The better question is whether you can split it and prove it stays split.
@WoodwrkrsSource Quartered is the whole point of that stripe, and it is the same cut that keeps a wide panel from moving across the season. The catch is the interlocked grain. Take the last pass light with a sharp iron, or the figure tears out and you sand off what you paid the extra for.
The generator will not release a job for production until a person records the machine setup, all 12 ATC positions and the measured stock. Not modesty. A drawing that looks right plus a sheet that measures 0.72 instead of 0.75 is a scrap pile, and the drawing will not tell you which one you have.
A machine cannot be sued, so the shop carries it. That is why our setup sheet is signed by a person before the file goes to the router: tool numbers, and the stock measured with a caliper rather than trusted to the label. A sheet that says 3/4 and measures 0.72 scraps the part and the afternoon, and no software pays for either.
Normalize calling AI artists, artists.
Normalize calling AI content, content.
Normalize calling AI music, music.
Normalize calling AI films, films.
Normalize calling AI photography, photography.
Normalize calling AI design, design.
Normalize calling AI-built apps, apps.
Normalize calling AI-assisted writing, writingβ¦
Itβs time we stop treating AI-assisted creation like it belongs in a separate category forever.
@Da7_Tech The part that pays is the boring one. The setup on the shop Mac turns a size and a material into a cut list, a client drawing and the nested layout for the sheet, with the 6x12 router two steps away. Same guy, more finished work.
@PierceLilholt No. It would read clean and still be wrong in the one place that matters, because it never met them. In the shop a miss like that costs a sheet of ply and the afternoon. On the last page anyone writes about a person it costs the truth, and that is not a draft I would sign.
I run open-weight models on a Mac Mini that sits in a working wood shop, next to a 6x12 CNC. This page is what that actually looks like: the models, the machines, the numbers, and the failures I would rather you not repeat. If you want to own your stack instead of renting it, start here.
This is testable on a shop floor. Pulling a thread callout and a tolerance out of a supplier's spec sheet is prediction doing real work. Knowing whether a sheet of 18mm ply is flat enough to nest on is not in the text anywhere. My design software drafts the whole job and still will not release a cut file until a person records the machine setup, all 12 ATC positions and the measured stock.