Agree. We advise our clients that the new playbook is a) get laser focused on who you serve, b) show up consistently and generously with your best thinking, c) nurture relationships to create respectful ways for folks to raise hands when they're ready, and knock their socks off with delivery.
@DallasCPA@JohnUChicago@RachlinSeth Such a great topic. I tell folks constantly that I have zero clue what things will be durable in a world of super intelligence. But I'm pretty confident access to capital and a great network will be two of them.
@carolinemassey Interesting - I do tend to think the legacy model (and more specifically the legacy pricing structure) is going to be hard for bigger firms to maintain. I suspect it becomes a barbell - the Kirklands of the world do fine, firms like yours do fine, the middle gets hollowed out.
@joshgcalderon Learning from PE is a great mental model - they care about recurring revenue, acquired systematically, where no one client represents too great a percentage. The same things that make an attractive business to them make for a durable business for ourselves.
@TonyVidler The accountability one is highly underrated, especially in enterprise / non founder-left clients. People don't want to bear the internal political risk. "McKinsey told me to do it" is much safer than "ChatGPT told me to do it."
@jkubicki@semafor The cross-selling bit seems huge - not just as a mechanism to provide additional sources of revenue for partners, but also as a way to mitigate key person risk by introducing clients to multiple partners in the firm.
@KHendersonCo We tell our (mostly boutique) clients to build a "rainmaker factory" - designing a repeatable way to help folks build authentic relationships at scale through thought leadership and systematic, high-value BD. Too much key person risk otherwise.
Congrats - exciting times ahead. FWIW the attorney clients we have (both work with startups, and mostly seed/a) have found GC-as-a-service to be uphill sledding this year as founders try to use the robots to answer all but their hardest questions. Transaction work as busy as ever though.
Love this. "Clients are happy" is the most salient for me. Our internal "company brain" reads our transcripts and tries to tease out client health. It's super helpful for me because a) it catches nuance I don't notice, and b) it surfaces potential issues on calls I'm not on. And it's quite accurate.
@NotGoKGreen@jonjfarb Love this SO much. I feel like all the AI talk underestimates how much of what a client is buying is someone they like and trust enough to talk through their toughest issues with. "Layoffs are brutal. But you'll retrench live to see another day." Cheap consolidation from a robot.
@hollylawly Huge difference between "personalized" and "personal". I've told clients for years that 5 truly personalized touches will beat 1000 pieces of mad lib spam. Especially true now that the tools make it so trivial to build and enrich lists.