as @brian_armstrong said here, AI agentic economy is projected to be bigger than the human economy.
agents will drive the majority of transaction volume, onchain and eventually offchain. they won’t have traditional bank accounts or identities, so hundreds of billions in agentic commerce will naturally settle onchain. And @coinbase has been making it a core focus to become the hub for AI agentic commerce.
AI agents make sense onchain. imo this will become one of crypto’s biggest use cases over the next few years, and it’s already starting to happen.
$SINGIT is building the infra for this: agentic commerce and payments through x402, allowing agents to transact permissionlessly without directly holding keys.
it solves a major piece of the agentic economy stack, is already processing significant AI agent volume, and was recently followed by @circle (@USDC) global marketing lead.
imo @SingItAgent could become one of the core infra layers for AI agents on @base.
Rules for thee not for me,
Another example of manipulative crypto twitter female larps that ENCOURAGE others not to take deals,
But if her "cute girlys" ESCORTS take deals
Then they are "hard working"
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
EV.
Provably fair dispute: @xxxmourn's investigation for player Heyri - who asked us to review his case with @Winna@paulwinnacom
We've only heard one side, so this is an invitation to Winna.
2 issues need answers.
Issue 1: The disputed bets can't be verified, at all. The public bet pages load with no result, no seeds, no fairness details. That page is the whole point of provably fair.
Issue 2: The VIP Slide had no lock on the outcome. Winna's own seed data shows it ran the Limbo formula with the safeguards stripped:
- a fresh operator seed every bet
- no published chain (the seeds connect to nothing)
- nonce stuck at 0
- a client seed fixed to a 2023 Bitcoin block the player couldn't change
The operator's seed alone decided each result, nothing locked it in beforehand.
That's the information we have been given at this stage.
To complete the record, we're asking @Winna to provide all 62 rounds, one row per bet: bet ID, time, stake, player's target, result, server seed, the hash shown before the bet.
Along with any other relevant information they have so we have both sides of the story.
Winna's fairness page confirms every one of these values should exist.
Only a pre bet commitment can prove fairness, but this lets us start a fair assessment of the situation - and we'll publish the outcome independently either way.
Ostium vault got exploited for $23.3M
Seems like the keys may have been compromised
Funds are still sitting on Arbitrum and haven’t been bridged out yet
In the KelpDAO/rsETH incident, the Arbitrum Security Council was able to rescue ETH from the exploiter’s address
Hopefully, they can act again before the attacker starts moving funds across bridges