The Covid scamdemic changed my perception of the reality of how our world is run. It became obvious that our politicians, our medical institutions and the mainstream media are corrupt to the core. They are mere puppets of big pharma, assorted globalist billionaires, the WEF and the WHO. They don't have our best interests at heart.
The deception, the manipulation, the fake science and the military-grade propaganda were all used to push a narrative that was false, dishonest and injurious to our health and well-being. Covid was a rehearsal for what the globalists plan for us - total control and our enslavement.
So dear citizen, think critically, question everything. Be prepared for the next scam/deception. Your life may depend on it
đš Council of Sanctuary⊠But Where Was the Housing Capacity Check?
âą NI housing waiting list: 43,971 (2021) â 50,381 (2026) (+15%)
âą Households in housing stress: 30,288 â 39,008 (+29%)
âą Full housing duty cases: 22,217 â 33,412 (+50%)
âą Social housing allocations: Still only around 6,000 a year
âą Average wait: 26.8 â 36.5 months
Newry, Mourne & Down:
âą 3,968 households waiting for social housing
âą 397 homes allocated last year
âą 159.4 average housing points required â among the highest in NI
This isnât about blaming refugees. Itâs about asking whether councillors did their homework before voting to join the Council of Sanctuary network.
Where is the housing capacity assessment? Where is the impact assessment? Where is the evidence our housing system can absorb additional demand?
Compassion and planning should go hand in hand.
Bryan Johnson spends millions trying to reverse ageing while avoiding the one free thing your body has used for millions of years.
Sunlight is not something to hide from. It is something your body knows exactly what to do with.
The moment sun hits bare skin, your body starts producing vitamin D, a hormone that supports your immune system, your bones and your mood in ways no capsule fully replicates.
Direct sunlight also helps regulate your circadian rhythm, which governs sleep quality and recovery overnight.
This is my medicine. How about you?
Defiant Djokovic survives five-hour thriller to reach Wimbledon semis. Epic battle. Especially with a bad shoulder. Bodies eventually wear out from elite sport, & recovery is definitely tougher. Listened on the radio whilst doing some work till pretty late https://t.co/ZYuEaczCyy
Thought Chat Control was dead? Like a deceased Democrat voter, it just rose again.
They say itâs about protecting children.
While actual kids are being groomed and trafficked, the EU wants to scan YOUR private messages, and thus make privacy illegal.
Use your voice now, before itâs too late!
âŒïžEngland 2026 where white female toddlers go through more security vetting than our invaders
You donât frisk a toddler and reduce her to tears. Ever. We all know who the actual security risk is in the UK and itâs not her.
Your Vacuum Cleaner Became an EU Matter
I talked to my mother yesterday. She is 84 and told me she had bought a new vacuum cleaner. She wanted one with at least 1600 watts, like her old one.
The man in the store told her those donât exist anymore. In 2017, the EU decided that no vacuum cleaner may have a motor above 900 watts. Everything above 1600 was already banned in 2014.
My mother never asked the EU for permission. Neither did you. But the decision was made for both of you.
The justification was the climate. The EU wanted to save energy, and millions of vacuum cleaners times many watts sounds like a lot. So they banned the powerful models. They didnât inform. They didnât label. They banned.
And then we were told we wouldnât notice the difference. That 900 watts cleans just as well as 1600.
That is not my experience. I have used both, and there is a world of difference. But you donât have to take my word for it. The claim was based on laboratory tests where vacuum cleaners were measured with an empty bag - a showroom illusion no one experiences at home, because suction drops as the bag fills up.
Dyson sued the EU on exactly this point. And in 2018, the EU Court ruled in their favor: the testing method was misleading, and the energy label was annulled. The EUâs own proof that you lost nothing didnât hold up in the EUâs own court.
So what did we get out of it?
The EUâs own figures say the rule saved around 11.7 TWh of electricity in 2020. That sounds massive, but it amounts to less than half a percent of the EUâs electricity consumption.
And mind you, that is the EUâs own calculation, measured against the EUâs own guess at how big vacuum cleaners would have been without the rule. There is no independent measurement.
And CO2? The EU accounts for 6-7 percent of the worldâs total emissions. That share shrinks year by year, while China and India build new coal plants. Even if the entire EU hit zero emissions tomorrow, it would barely register on the global curve. A vacuum cleaner rule that moves fractions of those 6-7 percent means nothing for the climate in the big picture.
But it means something for you.
You pay with your freedom of choice. My mother cannot buy the vacuum cleaner she wants. You pay with bureaucracy, control, and testing regimes. And you pay with the principle: that Brussels can regulate what you keep in your utility closet.
Here comes the objection, every time: âBut if all the small players say they donât matter, nothing ever happens.â
Fine. Then show me that it works. The EU has pursued this policy for over a decade. Global emissions have risen anyway - because the growth happens in China and India, far beyond Brusselsâ reach. We bought the symbol. Not the result.
And that is the mechanism you need to see. Each individual intervention is âsmallâ. The sum is called ânecessaryâ. By that logic, you can justify regulating almost anything in your home.
The problem is not that people care about the climate. The problem is that the concern has become a blank check to regulate citizensâ lives with no measurable effect. The power grows. The freedom shrinks. The climate doesnât change because of it.
âThis is the most authoritarian government we have seen in living memory.â
The last couple of days have reminded the Free Speech Union that the threat to free speech in this country has never been more acute.
But if we think things have been bad under Sir Keir Starmer, they are only set to get worse under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
His close ally, Lisa Nandy, is spearheading plans to force social media companies to prioritise the promotion of what the Government deems to be âtrustworthyâ news sources.
When Josh Simons â the former MP for Makerfield who resigned to allow Burnham to return to Westminster â was head of Labour Together, he oversaw a project that targeted journalists who wrote critically about the think tank and his political master at the time, Keir Starmer.
Now, Deputy Leader of the Labour Party Lucy Powell is calling for the effective censorship of social media platforms during election periods.
This is deeply authoritarian, and we must be alive to the threat it poses not only to free speech but also to our ability to have open political debate in this country.
Watch FSU External Affairs Officer @_ConnieShaw on @GBNEWS below đ