Austin Wright

Just this guy, you know?

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@jarredsumner I'm working on a compiler that goes directly from a grammar description to optimized machine code. You can then generate headers for it and link to that.

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@mikeproverbs10 @L_Bridgeford3 @MikeWingerii Who says we're not under the law? Jesus says we're under the law, Paul says we're under the law, we still see rainbows so even Noah says we're still under the law.

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@chrissev @Muse @bot How do they know?

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@jarredsumner https://t.co/BMktuB8ra7
You're welcome

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@barstoolsports Are we not able to see if a ball passes completely between two posts or not? Soccer has this figured out

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@brucedturrie @PoliticalStacy You're proving my point

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@L_Bridgeford3 @MikeWingerii I don't expect a person to prove his statement in a sentence, but if you can't even summarize it in a sentence I'm not watching the video

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@MikeWingerii @L_Bridgeford3 Bible: Unambiguous and uncontested statement "Do <thing>"
Guy: (hour long mental gymnastics on why "Do <thing>" doesn't mean you have to do <thing>)
*sigh*

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@googlecloud Why are you holding a lav mic

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@ajrgd "They would have had to validate and sanitize the name text entered" If you could compromise the integrity of the iPhone by writing a plain text file to unencrypted storage, we would have much bigger problems to worry about.

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@JamesDueck @LILindaLee38 @deuceatron @BridgeBrannon This is rules lawyering. It's not the word that you call it, it's the behavior that's verboten.

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@valigo But literally nobody else needs to do this... Why do I even need a launcher? Why can't I just, you know, INSTALL A GAME

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@Thunder_Chicken @LundukeJournal So? If you're using TLS, you're using DNS, that's just how the system works right now. Would you like to stand up for the class and present a solution that has no DNS whatsoever?

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@Markcanada96 @haprho @Tarqlet Well Mr. Check, while it may be a type of "jet engine" in certain circles, this particular "jet engine" would not be able to take off in a vacuum. Maybe a little bit of rolling down the runway (beltway?), but that's it.

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@More1ThanAny1 @haprho @Tarqlet You mean like a jet?

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@ctrsrev @Edesilon @randall_kznr You can also do it the other way, the system launches a process and runs it under the permissions of some user, like www-data.
There's also selinux which has permissions on top of this, which can prevent www-data from making system changes—even if you have the root password

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@ctrsrev @Edesilon @randall_kznr Not sure what you mean exactly, but just because an executable like php or apache is owned by one user doesn't mean that's the user it runs with the permissions of. That's only true for very special executables like sudo, which always runs as root regardless of who launched it.

[Austin Wright @awwright]

@Markcanada96 @haprho @Tarqlet Not for the purposes of this thread, where the jet part of the engine has to be able to get the plane off the ground.