Aaron X. Sobel

@YaleLawSch ‘23 || formerly @CarnegieDCG @princeton

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Pleased to share my latest in the Penn Law Rev. online on FISA! I suggest expanding appellate review of FISA decisions through modest tweaks to the FISA amicus curiae system. Doing so would expand procedural protections while avoiding legal pitfalls of other proposed reforms.

[University of Pennsylvania Law Review @PennLRev]

Ahead of FISA's pending expiration, the Penn Law Review Online is pleased to publish @axsobel's "Procedural Protections in a Secret Court: FISA Amici and Expanding Appellate Review of FISA Decisions." https://t.co/4aaVQih3yi

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Thanks for having us on the @lawfare podcast, Matt!

[Lawfare @lawfare]

On today’s episode, @matthew_gluck spoke with Sean Mirski and @axsobel of @arnoldporter about the 8th Circuit’s decision reviving part of Missouri’s lawsuit against defendants connected to the Chinese gov't and the implications for U.S. foreign policy.
https://t.co/AmVn7e8Qq6

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Proud to copublish with John Bellinger, Sean Mirski, and Catherine McCarthy on this fascinating subject!

[Lawfare @lawfare]

John Bellinger, Sean Mirski, Catherine McCarthy, and @axsobel from @arnoldporter examine the 8th Circuit's decision to allow Missouri’s COVID lawsuit against China to move forward, and its implications for U.S. foreign policy. https://t.co/rEO44qcL2j

[Lawfare @lawfare]

John Bellinger, Sean Mirski, Catherine McCarthy, and @axsobel from @arnoldporter examine the 8th Circuit's decision to allow Missouri’s COVID lawsuit against China to move forward, and its implications for U.S. foreign policy. https://t.co/rEO44qcL2j

[Lawfare @lawfare]

"Fourth Amendment doctrine has repeatedly struggled to keep pace with the novel privacy issues that attend evolving surveillance technology."
@axsobel argues that the 4th A doesn’t actually prevent the gov't from purchasing personal data from data brokers. https://t.co/3WRhN7P3fB

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

@RachelKleinfeld @YaleLawSch Thanks so much, Rachel! Always grateful for your support!

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Elated that my Note on data brokers and the Fourth Amendment won @YaleLawSch’s Burton H. Brody Prize in Constitutional Law and the Edward D. Robbins Memorial Prize for best student publication appearing outside YLJ. It is officially out in YLPR — check it out here!

[Yale Law & Policy Review @YaleLawPolicyR]

In his new Note in YLPR, Aaron X. Sobel (@axsobel) argues that the Fourth Amendment does not regulate government purchases of geolocation data and urges Congress to pass legislation to regulate private sales of such data.

Read "End-Running Warrants" here: https://t.co/EC7ZXOiPKc

[Yale Law & Policy Review @YaleLawPolicyR]

In his new Note in YLPR, Aaron X. Sobel (@axsobel) argues that the Fourth Amendment does not regulate government purchases of geolocation data and urges Congress to pass legislation to regulate private sales of such data.

Read "End-Running Warrants" here: https://t.co/EC7ZXOiPKc

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Enormous thanks, as always, to the incredible @oonahathaway, without whom this piece couldn’t be possible!

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Pleased to share my latest in the Penn Law Rev. online on FISA! I suggest expanding appellate review of FISA decisions through modest tweaks to the FISA amicus curiae system. Doing so would expand procedural protections while avoiding legal pitfalls of other proposed reforms.

[University of Pennsylvania Law Review @PennLRev]

Ahead of FISA's pending expiration, the Penn Law Review Online is pleased to publish @axsobel's "Procedural Protections in a Secret Court: FISA Amici and Expanding Appellate Review of FISA Decisions." https://t.co/4aaVQih3yi

[University of Pennsylvania Law Review @PennLRev]

Ahead of FISA's pending expiration, the Penn Law Review Online is pleased to publish @axsobel's "Procedural Protections in a Secret Court: FISA Amici and Expanding Appellate Review of FISA Decisions." https://t.co/4aaVQih3yi

[Yale Law & Policy Review @YaleLawPolicyR]

A forthcoming YLPR piece was featured in the ALI Adviser! @AmLawInst has featured "End-Running Warrants: Purchasing Data under the Fourth Amendment and the State Action Problem" by Aaron Sobel (@axsobel). This piece will be in Vol. 42, Issue 1! Read more: https://t.co/WfYCSbALti

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Thank you to the @AmLawInst for featuring my piece, forthcoming in @YaleLawPolicyR, on their website! https://t.co/ornseejuNp

You can find a pre-print of my piece, on the constitutionality of government purchases of data, here: https://t.co/mpujibbsYB

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

@OrinKerr Thank you for tagging! Very pertinent.

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Thank you and all your amazing editors! Thrilled to be publishing with you all!

[Yale Law & Policy Review @YaleLawPolicyR]

We are excited to be publishing "End-Running Warrants: Purchasing Data under the Fourth Amendment and the State Action Problem" by Aaron Sobel (forthcoming in YLPR, Vol. 42). This timely piece will shape the debate about new legislation governing data. Check it out!

[Yale Law & Policy Review @YaleLawPolicyR]

We are excited to be publishing "End-Running Warrants: Purchasing Data under the Fourth Amendment and the State Action Problem" by Aaron Sobel (forthcoming in YLPR, Vol. 42). This timely piece will shape the debate about new legislation governing data. Check it out!

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

Huge thanks to @oonahathaway for all her support on this project!

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

With the 4th Amendment is Not For Sale Act (FAINFSA) returning to Congress, see my latest @YaleLawPolicyR! I argue gov't purchases from data brokers are not "state action," and so not protected by the Constitution. But Congress can do better than FAINFSA: https://t.co/mpujibbsYB

[Aaron X. Sobel @axsobel]

When Congress sues the executive branch for waging illegal wars, courts dismiss their suits for presenting a political question. But Congress can overcome this barrier and recover a role for the courts.

My latest w/ Prof @oonahathaway & Mike Sullivan:

https://t.co/s4N3EyiZCY

[Just Security @just_security]

Recovering a role for the courts in decisions to wage war:

Congress could act to limit courts’ ability to dismiss cases before they reach the merits.

From @axsobel, Michael Sullivan and @oonahathaway:
https://t.co/pFMcKTc2n9