@CCCriminalcops@TweetsByBritt No. Maybe requiring that people who are known to be infected to wear a mask might be equivalent. But no, treating everyone as a potential drunk driver and taking away their cars preemptively is what you're talking about.
@hiphopjunkie86 @FreckledLiberty "effective"... ok
But the virus IS primarily constrained by large population centers.
Rural Montana is not the same situation as urban NYC, right? So why would the rules be the same?
@hiphopjunkie86 @FreckledLiberty Why the crap not? Basically nobody will need to know all 50. 99%+ of people will only need to know one. And it'll be the one that most likely makes the most sense to their own state. On the other hand, why would Montana follow the same plan as New York? THAT makes no sense.