@AakeAndersson@FredricMorenius I find the graph interesting, but not odd. Nicușor Dan’s support is highly localized (urban, educated, tech-savvy areas), so large spikes in some areas and minimal support in others are expected.
.Voter turnout, endorsements, and strategic voting shift heavily between rounds.
@FreezerChu@AakeAndersson@FredricMorenius@FreezerChu, With a bit of logic and basic arithmetic your lol will vanish quickly.
Round 2: 3.1M =1.48M Romania+1.64Diaspora.
Round 1: 2.19M=1.22M Romania+0.97M Diaspora.
260000 more in round 2 vs round 1 in Romania is absolutely reasonable (students!).
@FreezerChu@AakeAndersson@FredricMorenius@FreezerChu Show me the precinct that registered 300 supplementary votes in a village of 230. And if you found one, there should be many more like this in order for the presumptive “fraud” to be significant. I am asking seriously, not ironically.
@AakeAndersson@FredricMorenius I find the graph interesting, but not odd. Nicușor Dan’s support is highly localized (urban, educated, tech-savvy areas), so large spikes in some areas and minimal support in others are expected.
.Voter turnout, endorsements, and strategic voting shift heavily between rounds.