Abu Hidayah

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@F_Riz110 @IbnalIskandar Looking for "Iran" and "Saudi Arabia". Have you seen them ?

[Sulayman al-Kindi 🔻 @sulayman_Kindi]

The martyrdom of Shaykh Faruq Ramadan is part of several incidents to bring the Ghazzah genocide to the West Bank.
I'll NOT say make dua. That ship has sailed. That was the least the ummah could do 80 years ago. Dua and a few pennies of charity doesn't absolve us

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@RyanRozbiani

[Sulayman al-Kindi 🔻 @sulayman_Kindi]

Respectfully "young people will make mistakes" overlooks the elephant. We've become party to the west's concoction of "teenager" which didn't exist 200 yrs ago. You're either child or adult. Hence 16 year old generals are stories and nikāh of Aisha RA controversial to munāfiqūn

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@Criter10n @Sa1aahudeen Count me in

[Eymen @eymnusame]

Şeyhülislam İbn Teymiyye (Allah ona rahmet etsin) şöyle demiştir:

"Bu Tevrat'ın nüshaları tahrif edilmiştir (değiştirilmiştir), içindekilerle amel etmek caiz değildir. Bugün onun tahrif edilmiş ve hükmü kaldırılmış (neshedilmiş) şeriatlarıyla amel eden kimse kâfirdir."

Mecmuu'l-Fetava 35/200

Derim ki:
Peki ya maymunların ve domuzların torunlarının zihinlerinin çöplüğünden alınan şeytani kanunlarla amel edenlerin durumu nasıldır?

Dahası, sadece kendi amel etmekle yetinmeyip başkalarını da bunlara uymaya zorlayanlara ne demeli?

Ebu Hemmam

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@koster_art @UchaHAbdulGhani @BarbaraOneillAU Got any reference for your claim?

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@Ashek_E_Bangla You got a reference for that?

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@MercifulMessage @Jrmundgandr Have you verified the photo card you shared? Or you trying to live up to your name "cowboy"?

[Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar @IbnalIskandar]

We criticize and separate from Ahl as-Sunnah the Ash'aris, Maturidis, Mu'tazilah, and extremist Sufis on the basis of Aqidah and false principles.

So, it doesn't matter if you bring 1,000 texts about Tafsir, Usul, Shuruh al-Hadith, Mustalah al-Hadith, or Fiqh which Ash'aris, Maturidis, Mu'tazilis, and extremist Sufis have authored which contain some benefit for the senior seekers of knowledge and scholars.

You will not bring a single work of Aqidah from them that Ahl as-Sunnah accepts as definitive or representative of the sound creed.

There is a select few who attribute themselves to Ahl as-Sunnah that reject those works from Hadith sciences, Fiqh, Usul, Tafsir, etc. authored by Ash'aris, Maturidis, extremist Sufis, and Mu'tazilah.

They don't represent Ahl as-Sunnah in their rejection of works in the various sciences on the basis of their authors' mistakes in Aqidah, any more than the select few who claim those works in the various sciences make their authors' Aqidah correct and sound.

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@UnknownRoy15233 @meowbundi You think for hundreds of years, thousands of scholars wrote hundreds of volumes of works on some pesky refutations?
Please, pick up a book and read!

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@IbnalIskandar That guy is a self proclaimed "historian". He has no business discussing shar'i ahkaam, let alone argue with a scholar!

[Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar @IbnalIskandar]

What does it mean to challenge a Muslim to provide evidence from "Quran/Sunnah" for a well-known legal view among Ahl as-Sunnah?

Either Adnan Rashid doesn't accept the legal view as valid or he doesn't think that the person being asked can find the evidence.

Regardless of what he knows or doesn't know about me, he's wrong for alleging that it's "impossible" to find the evidence for a Mu'tamad legal position for two of the four Madhaahib of Ahl as-Sunnah.

From al-Mudawwanah:

قَالَ: قَالَ مَالِكٌ فِي الْمَجُوسِ مَا قَدْ بَلَغَك عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ أَنَّهُ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم «سُنُّوا بِهِمْ سُنَّةَ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ» فَالْأُمَمُ كُلُّهَا فِي هَذَا بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْمَجُوسِ عِنْدِي.

[Ibn al-Qasim] said: "Malik said about the Majus [the same as] what has reached you from Abd ar-Rahman bin Awf, that he said, the Messenger of Allah SAWS said: 'There was taken as a tradition by them a tradition [like that of] the Sunnah of Ahl al-Kitab'."

"Thus, the nations, all of them, are in this [matter of Jizyah] in the position of the Majus according to me..."

Vol. I, page 529

From Mukhtasar al-Quduri:

وتوضع الجزية على أهل الكتاب والمجوس وعبدة الأوثان من العجم ولا توضع على عبدة الأوثان من العرب ولا على المرتدين

"Jizyah is placed on Ahl al-Kitab, the Majus, and the worshipers of idols among the non-Arabs and it is not placed on the worshipers of idols among the Arabs nor on apostates..."

Page 236

These are relied-upon texts in the Hanafi and Maliki schools. Their texts of Fiqh continuously affirm this Hukm for over 1,000 years until today.

There is no "controversy" in this being the Hukm according to these two schools of Ahl as-Sunnah and no Sunni Muslim rejects this Hukm as "false" or "without evidence," unless he is an ignorant layperson or an extreme Madh'hab partisan.

The evidence from Quran and Sunnah backing up this Hukm is found in their intermediate and advanced works of Fiqh such as:

وَلَا يَجُوزُ إبْقَاءُ الْكَافِرِ عَلَى الْكُفْرِ إلَّا مَعَ ‌الْجِزْيَةِ أَوْ مَعَ الرِّقِّ

"A non-Muslim remaining upon Disbelief is not allowed except with Jizyah or with slavery..."

Al-Bida'i as-Sana'i, Vol. VII, page 136

وَمُشْرِكُو الْعَجَمِ مُلْحَقُونَ بِأَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ فِي هَذَا الْحُكْمِ بِالنَّصِّ الَّذِي رَوَيْنَا.

"The polytheists non-Arabs are attached to Ahl al-Kitab in this Hukm [of paying Jizyah] by means of primary texts which we transmit...."

Ibid, Vol. VII, page 111

From Fat'h al-Qadir by Ibn al-Humam:

وأما المجوس عبدة النار ففي البخاري: «ولم يكن عمر رضي الله عنه أخذ الجزية من المجوس حتى شهد عبد الرحمن بن عوف أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أخذها من مجوس هجر» وهذا قول المصنف (ووضع عليه الصلاة والسلام الجزية على المجوس) وهجر بلدة في البحرين (قوله وعبدة الأوثان) بالجر: أي وتوضع على عبدة الأوثان من العجم

"As for the Majus, worshipers of Fire, then in al-Bukhari is that Umar RA would not take Jizyah from the Majus until Abd ar-Rahman bin Awf testified that the Messenger of Allah SAWS took it from the Majus of Hajar. This statement of the author [al-Marghinani] (He SAWS placed Jizyah on the Majus) and Hajar is a city in Bahrain."

"His statement (...and the worshipers of idols) is with the genitive case, in other words, and [Jizyah] is placed on the worshipers of idols among the non-Arabs..."

Vol. VI, page 47

And so on...

But people like Adnan Rashid are not interested in the truth or Islamic law.

They are simply out to make a name for themselves through self-promotion and appearing on any and every platform that will host them.

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@IbnalIskandar Ameen

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@NaifAliAlaida @KatanaLTD Wow! Is that supposed to be good?

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@HashimBarre9 @DillyHussain88 As a dog deserves...

[Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar @IbnalIskandar]

Again, the matter of who must be fought first is not a subjective matter.

There is Fiqh involved and legal rulings based on the Quran:

{Oh, you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you...} [9:123]

If you read the works of Fiqh on the subject, they are very clear that the matter of who to fight - the closer or the farther enemy - is a matter of Hukm, or legal ruling.

Al-Imam Ahmad said, based on the above Ayah:

ليس لأحد أن يخرج من بلاده وبها العدو، فيقاتل غيرهم.

"It is not for anyone to depart from his land to fight others while the enemy is in it..."

Al-Jami' li-Ulum il-Imam Ahmad, #1592

Another understanding of this Ayah is that it refers to Muslims who effectively apostatize:

قال الشَّافِعِيُّ رحمه الله: " وَإِذَا أَسْلَمَ الْقَوْمُ ثُمَّ ارْتَدُّوا عَنِ الْإِسْلَامِ إِلَى أَيِّ كُفْرٍ كَانَ فِي دَارِ الْإِسْلَامِ أَوْ دَارِ الْحَرْبِ وَهُمْ مَقْهُورُونَ أَوْ قَاهِرُونَ فِي مَوْضِعِهِمُ الَّذِي ارتدوا فيه فعلى المسلمين أن يبدؤوا بِجِهَادِهِمْ قَبْلَ جِهَادِ أَهْلِ الْحَرْبِ الَّذِينَ لَمْ يسلموا قط) ...

وإما أن يكونوا جماع�� قاهرين فالواجب أَنْ يَبْدَأَ بِقِتَالِهِمْ قَبْلَ قِتَالِ أَهْلِ الْحَرْبِ لِقَوْلِ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى: {قَاتِلُوا الَّذِينَ ‌يَلُونَكُمْ ‌مِنَ ‌الْكُفَّارِ} [التوبة: 123] فَكَانَ مَنْ عَدَلَ عَنْ دِينِنَا أَقْرَبَ إِلَيْنَا، وَلِأَنَّ الصَّحَابَةَ أَجْمَعُوا عَلَى الِابْتِدَاءِ بقتالهم حين ارتدوا بِمَوْتِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم َ

[Al-Imam] ash-Shafi'ee, may Allah have mercy on him, said:

"When a people convert to Islam then apostatize from Islam to any Disbelief there is, in Dar al-Islam or Dar al-Harb, while they are subdued [by others] or they have subdued others, in their place in which they have apostatized, then it is required for Muslims to initiate Jihad against them before Jihad against Ahl al-Harb who never converted to Islam."

[Abul-Hasan al-Mawardi explained]:

"As for when [the apostates] are the ones in control, then it is an obligation to initiate fighting them before fighting Ahl al-Harb due to the statement of Allah, may He be exalted: {Fight those who are close to you among the Disbelievers}[9:123]. Thus, whoever turns away from our Deen is the closest to us; and because the Sahabah RA agreed on initiating fighting them when they apostatized upon the death of the Messenger of Allah SAWS..."

Al-Hawi al-Kabir, 13/442

Of course there are elements, factors, and circumstances to consider that are beyond textual matters. But, it's extremely important to first learn the legal rulings surrounding the subject and THEN learn the circumstantial factors that surround a particular situation which requires application of the legal rulings based on the Quran & Sunnah.

Many Muslims don't even know that the matters they're weighing in on deal with specific legal rulings in Fiqh.

Instead of informing themselves of the Fiqh surrounding an issue or asking people of knowledge first, they run around volunteering their unqualified and uninformed opinions about everything affecting the Ummah.

And many arrogant, ignorant Muslims ridicule knowledge of Fiqh when they are called out for contravening it in the course of volunteering their unqualified, uninformed views.

These are very troubling times wherein ignoramuses are celebrated and their unqualified views widely circulated and popularized and those with at least some knowledge and those who are knowledgeable are ridiculed, boycotted, and ignored.

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@MercifulMessage @rewhum It's in the name....A "cowboy"!

[Abu Hidayah @Azubi2017]

@Islam_Tawheed01 Your quotation from Ar-Rawdh al-Murbi, can you put it in context please. Is this talking about Muslim lands or the lands of disbelievers?