🐭 Cat🅉illa 🏴‍☠️

@b_1n0

#RespectAnimals #NoEU 'Colui che non si crea un'anima vive come un porco e muore come un cane.'

Draghistan

Joined October 2009

1K Following

809 Followers

96.8K Posts

b_1n0 retweeted

Patrick Webb

@Patrickwebb

1 day ago

BREAKING: The three major U.S. broadcast networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC, have yet to report on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification regarding Anthony Fauci’s cover-up of the COVID-19 pandemic.

101K

26K

b_1n0 retweeted

Laura 🐷🐸🐞🐍☯️ @LauraRewind

2 days ago

La Germania, dopo la Polonia, è il paese più colpito dall'influenza aviaria con 51 focolai. Non ha adottato alcun progetto pilota di vaccinazione al contrario dell'Italia la quale non potrà esportare i prodotti sottoposti a vaccinazione. La Germania non vaccina, esporta 😊

LauraRewind's tweet photo. La Germania, dopo la Polonia, è il paese più colpito dall'influenza aviaria con 51 focolai.
Non ha adottato alcun progetto pilota di vaccinazione al contrario dell'Italia la quale non potrà esportare i prodotti sottoposti a vaccinazione.
La Germania non vaccina, esporta 😊 https://t.co/f2Zyyshnor

259

152

b_1n0 retweeted

Marce〰️ Vann〰️ @MarceVann

1 day ago

Implora. Sgoverna. Con il passo della ginocchiera.

281

b_1n0 retweeted

Progetto Razzia @PRazzia

1 day ago

Il video che stavate aspettando. Cosa è il FASCISMO: teorie, modelli e paradigmi Una faticaccia 👇👇 https://t.co/dcnRtYdnXc via @YouTube

Who to follow

Dobby is free NATALE MARIA Z

@tiziana_lisa

a me basta saperti qui da qualche parte perché la voglia di vivere non mi abbandoni!

b_1n0 retweeted

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

2 days ago

Fauci committed so many evil crimes

16K

362K

73K

22K

22M

b_1n0 retweeted

🏴‍☠️ The Pirate 🏴‍☠️

@Pinperepette

2 days ago

“Ma Pirata, a te piace Vannacci?” No. Io sono antieuropeista. Penso che dall’Unione Europea si debba uscire, non passarci la vita a dire che la combatti dall’interno mentre ci resti comodamente seduto. Mi sembra una strategia efficace quanto curare la diarrea mangiando più lassativi. E non voterei mai qualcuno che ha appoggiato il Green Pass e tutta quella stagione di demenza collettiva, in cui diritti fondamentali sono stati sospesi tra applausi, slogan e certificati da mostrare per prendere un caffè.

588

15K

b_1n0 retweeted

IA Davide Marchiani @incel_aidigino

3 days ago

Discorso lucidissimo sul livello che abbiamo raggiunto nel momento in cui i cittadini si fanno giustizia da soli. La colpa è dei giudici e delle istituzioni.

100

285

108

16K

b_1n0 retweeted

Chance🤺 🍊 @ChanceGardi

2 days ago

Il futuro dell'UE

127

b_1n0 retweeted

Kiera Diss

@KieraDiss

2 days ago

“THIS HAS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING!” This is HUGE - streamer @Asmongold has just released his 6 HOUR, 52 MINUTES full reading of Rupert Lowe’s @rapeganginquiry report. This is going to be tough viewing for his audience. It needs to be done.

194

15K

850

157K

b_1n0 retweeted

Vladimiro Giacché @Comunardo

2 days ago

Fatti, non parole!

120

b_1n0 retweeted

Millie Marconi

@MillieMarconnni

2 days ago

A Japanese immunologist spent 20 years proving that the chemicals trees release into the air walk into your bloodstream, hunt down your stress hormones, and arm your immune system in ways no therapist or pharmaceutical has ever matched, and most of the data has been sitting in Japanese medical journals for two decades waiting to be translated. His name is Qing Li. He is a clinical professor at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo and the president of the Japanese Society of Forest Medicine. The Japanese government has been funding his research since 2004, and the body of work he has produced is the reason forest bathing is now an officially prescribed clinical therapy in Japan and Korea. The story actually starts in 1982, when the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries coined the term shinrin-yoku to describe the practice of slow, mindful walking in a forest. They did it for a practical reason. Japan was urbanizing fast, stress-related illness was climbing, and the country had thousands of square kilometers of forest sitting unused. The idea was to give people a reason to walk into the trees... They had no idea what was actually happening to the human body during those walks until Qing Li ran the first proper experiment in 2005. He took twelve healthy adult men on a three-day, two-night trip to a forest park. They walked for a few hours each day. Nothing strenuous. No prescribed routes or breathing exercises. They simply walked slowly through the trees, breathing the air, looking at the forest. Li drew blood and urine samples before the trip, on the second day, on the third day, on day seven after returning home, and again on day thirty. The numbers that came back from the lab were not what anyone expected. The activity of a specific type of immune cell called the natural killer cell, which is the cell your body uses to hunt down cancer cells and virus-infected cells before they can spread, had jumped by roughly 50 percent during the forest trip. The actual number of natural killer cells circulating in the bloodstream had increased significantly. Three different anti-cancer proteins that those cells produce, called perforin, granzymes, and granulysin, had all risen sharply. And the effect did not disappear when the men went home. The immune boost was still measurable on day seven and was still partially present on day thirty. Two hours a day in a forest had upgraded the immune system for a full month. Li ran the same experiment with women a year later and found nearly identical results. Then he ran it with a control group who took a three-day trip through an urban area with the same amount of walking, the same hotel quality, and the same diet. The urban group showed no measurable change in natural killer cell activity at all. The forest was doing the work, not the vacation. The mechanism turned out to be a class of airborne molecules called phytoncides. Trees produce these compounds to defend themselves against insects, bacteria, and fungi. Pine, cedar, oak, and cypress trees release them in particularly large amounts, especially in warmer weather and after rainfall. When you walk through a forest, you are inhaling those molecules into your lungs and absorbing them through your skin, and once inside your body they appear to directly stimulate the production and activity of the very immune cells Li was measuring in his lab. Roughly 50 percent of the health benefit of a forest walk, according to Li's data, comes from the chemistry of the air itself. The other half comes from what the forest is doing to your nervous system. This is where it stops being only about the immune system and starts being about stress. A separate Japanese research team measured cortisol, the body's main stress hormone, in 84 participants across 35 different forest sites. They drew samples before and after a 30-minute walk in each forest and compared them to control walks in matched urban environments. The cortisol levels of the people who walked in the forest were lower than the cortisol levels of the people who walked in the city by a significant margin. Their heart rates were lower. Their blood pressure was lower. The activity of their parasympathetic nervous system, which is the part responsible for rest and recovery, had gone up. The activity of their sympathetic nervous system, which is the part that drives fight or flight, had gone down. Then a researcher at the University of Michigan named MaryCarol Hunter ran the cleanest version of this experiment ever done. She recruited participants from a city and told them to take a nature pill three times a week for eight weeks. They were free to choose the time, the place, and the duration of the nature experience, as long as it was outside, in daylight, and free of phones, conversations, and aerobic exercise. They sent her saliva samples before and after each session so she could measure cortisol changes accurately and rule out the normal daily drop in stress hormones that happens to everyone. The result was that participants experienced a 21.3 percent drop in cortisol per hour spent in nature, with the biggest payoff happening between minutes 20 and 30 of the walk. After that, the cortisol kept dropping, but more slowly. The threshold dose for measurable stress relief was just 20 minutes outside in something that looked and felt like nature. What none of this means is that nature is a substitute for therapy or for medication when someone genuinely needs them. Therapy treats different things than a walk does, and Li himself has been careful in interviews to call forest bathing a complementary intervention rather than a replacement for clinical care. But what the research has settled is that the human body has a physiological response to being among trees that operates on the same biological systems modern medicine is trying to reach with drugs and clinical protocols, and that response is fast, measurable, and free. The strangest part of Li's work is the implication he keeps repeating in interviews. The average person now spends more than 90 percent of their life indoors. Their cortisol stays elevated. Their natural killer cells stay sluggish. Their parasympathetic nervous system rarely gets a chance to take over. The system that was tuned by millions of years of life under a canopy of trees is being asked to run permanently inside a box made of drywall and screens. Your body has not forgotten what it is supposed to do in a forest. It is waiting for you to walk into one.

MillieMarconnni's tweet photo. A Japanese immunologist spent 20 years proving that the chemicals trees release into the air walk into your bloodstream, hunt down your stress hormones, and arm your immune system in ways no therapist or pharmaceutical has ever matched, and most of the data has been sitting in Japanese medical journals for two decades waiting to be translated.

His name is Qing Li.

He is a clinical professor at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo and the president of the Japanese Society of Forest Medicine. The Japanese government has been funding his research since 2004, and the body of work he has produced is the reason forest bathing is now an officially prescribed clinical therapy in Japan and Korea.

The story actually starts in 1982, when the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries coined the term shinrin-yoku to describe the practice of slow, mindful walking in a forest. They did it for a practical reason.

Japan was urbanizing fast, stress-related illness was climbing, and the country had thousands of square kilometers of forest sitting unused. The idea was to give people a reason to walk into the trees... They had no idea what was actually happening to the human body during those walks until Qing Li ran the first proper experiment in 2005.

He took twelve healthy adult men on a three-day, two-night trip to a forest park. They walked for a few hours each day. Nothing strenuous. No prescribed routes or breathing exercises. They simply walked slowly through the trees, breathing the air, looking at the forest.

Li drew blood and urine samples before the trip, on the second day, on the third day, on day seven after returning home, and again on day thirty.

The numbers that came back from the lab were not what anyone expected.

The activity of a specific type of immune cell called the natural killer cell, which is the cell your body uses to hunt down cancer cells and virus-infected cells before they can spread, had jumped by roughly 50 percent during the forest trip. The actual number of natural killer cells circulating in the bloodstream had increased significantly.

Three different anti-cancer proteins that those cells produce, called perforin, granzymes, and granulysin, had all risen sharply. And the effect did not disappear when the men went home. The immune boost was still measurable on day seven and was still partially present on day thirty.

Two hours a day in a forest had upgraded the immune system for a full month.

Li ran the same experiment with women a year later and found nearly identical results. Then he ran it with a control group who took a three-day trip through an urban area with the same amount of walking, the same hotel quality, and the same diet.

The urban group showed no measurable change in natural killer cell activity at all. The forest was doing the work, not the vacation.

The mechanism turned out to be a class of airborne molecules called phytoncides. Trees produce these compounds to defend themselves against insects, bacteria, and fungi. Pine, cedar, oak, and cypress trees release them in particularly large amounts, especially in warmer weather and after rainfall.

When you walk through a forest, you are inhaling those molecules into your lungs and absorbing them through your skin, and once inside your body they appear to directly stimulate the production and activity of the very immune cells Li was measuring in his lab.

Roughly 50 percent of the health benefit of a forest walk, according to Li's data, comes from the chemistry of the air itself. The other half comes from what the forest is doing to your nervous system.

This is where it stops being only about the immune system and starts being about stress.

A separate Japanese research team measured cortisol, the body's main stress hormone, in 84 participants across 35 different forest sites. They drew samples before and after a 30-minute walk in each forest and compared them to control walks in matched urban environments. The cortisol levels of the people who walked in the forest were lower than the cortisol levels of the people who walked in the city by a significant margin. Their heart rates were lower. Their blood pressure was lower.

The activity of their parasympathetic nervous system, which is the part responsible for rest and recovery, had gone up. The activity of their sympathetic nervous system, which is the part that drives fight or flight, had gone down.

Then a researcher at the University of Michigan named MaryCarol Hunter ran the cleanest version of this experiment ever done. She recruited participants from a city and told them to take a nature pill three times a week for eight weeks.

They were free to choose the time, the place, and the duration of the nature experience, as long as it was outside, in daylight, and free of phones, conversations, and aerobic exercise. They sent her saliva samples before and after each session so she could measure cortisol changes accurately and rule out the normal daily drop in stress hormones that happens to everyone.

The result was that participants experienced a 21.3 percent drop in cortisol per hour spent in nature, with the biggest payoff happening between minutes 20 and 30 of the walk.

After that, the cortisol kept dropping, but more slowly. The threshold dose for measurable stress relief was just 20 minutes outside in something that looked and felt like nature.

What none of this means is that nature is a substitute for therapy or for medication when someone genuinely needs them. Therapy treats different things than a walk does, and Li himself has been careful in interviews to call forest bathing a complementary intervention rather than a replacement for clinical care.

But what the research has settled is that the human body has a physiological response to being among trees that operates on the same biological systems modern medicine is trying to reach with drugs and clinical protocols, and that response is fast, measurable, and free.

The strangest part of Li's work is the implication he keeps repeating in interviews. The average person now spends more than 90 percent of their life indoors. Their cortisol stays elevated. Their natural killer cells stay sluggish.

Their parasympathetic nervous system rarely gets a chance to take over. The system that was tuned by millions of years of life under a canopy of trees is being asked to run permanently inside a box made of drywall and screens.

Your body has not forgotten what it is supposed to do in a forest. It is waiting for you to walk into one.

494

34K

10K

21K

b_1n0 retweeted

Francesca Donato

@ladyonorato

2 days ago

Il terzo Reich era un ordinamento equilibrato e democratico in confronto a questi

278

118

b_1n0 retweeted

Heather Parisi 🤐

@heather_parisi

2 days ago

Cara @caterinabalivo La domanda da fare non è se sia scientificamente provato che ci siano effetti avversi da vaccini Covid. La domanda è un'altra. Perché, se nella TV pubblica qualcuno dà notizia di un effetto avverso, scatta subito il panico? Perché questa fottuta paura di indagare, di chiedere, di voler sapere di fronte alla denuncia? E perché, puntuale come un orologio, arriva sempre qualcuno a ricordarci che "i vaccini hanno salvato milioni di vite"? Come se approfondire fosse automaticamente essere un negazionista. Come se sollevare dubbi fosse un reato. Come se la verità si difendesse chiudendo le bocche e non aprendo gli occhi. Questa, Caterina, è la vera paura.

260

641

46K

b_1n0 retweeted

Ryan

@forbiddenmerch

2 days ago

German woman with Tourettes has an interesting tick

342

19K

b_1n0 retweeted

Progetto Razzia @PRazzia

2 days ago

Problema di facilissima soluzione: noi possiamo espellerli, voi potete tenerli. (Se dimostrate di saperli tenere e non ce li fate tornare qui)

b_1n0 retweeted

Lars Andersen

@LarsAnders1620

2 days ago

Maskerede betjente uden kendelse smadrer min dør pga yndlingstals- og journalisme-kriminalitet. I morges kl 0947, da jeg var på vej i bad hørte jeg først ét højt brag. Derefter kiggede jeg i dørspionen og så en gruppe sortklædte og maskerede mænd (mundbind og mørke solbriller) på vej op af trappen. De begyndte straks at hamre på lejlighedens dør med en rambuk uden på noget tidspunkt at ringe på eller give sig til kende. Kort efter var de inde i lejligheden (det er ca. her videoen starter) og de lagde mig promte i håndjern. Næsten alle 8-10 betjente var iført mundbind og mørke briller - helt klart maskering som højst sandsynligt er ulovligt. De kunne ikke fremvise nogen kendelse og ville ikke sige, hvad jeg var sigtet for. "Det ville tilgå". Lejlighedens overvågning blev herefter pillet ned af betjentene af "sikkerhedsmæssige hensyn". Kort efter blev jeg kørt på Bellahøj Politistation, mens lejligheden blev endevendt. Her blev jeg fotograferet, rullet fingeraftryk og DNA skrabet - uagtet at politiet har det hele i forvejen. Først til sidst (ved 16 tiden) blev jeg informeret om, hvad jeg var sigtet for: at have det forkerte yndlingstal og at forsøge at interviewe statsministeren om afviklingen af danskernes privatliv gennem forbud mod kryptering og permanent PET-overvågning af alle danskere. Jeg blev løsladt kl 1640 og kunne begive mig hjem til fods. Selve anholdelsen betragter jeg som ulovlig. Man må ikke anholde til afhøring - det følger af retsplejelovens paragraf 750. De har allerede både fingeraftryk, foto og DNA - og sagen har intet som helst at gøre med fysiske spor. Det er også stærkt tvivlsomt, om den helt uvarslede smadring af døren har levet op til proportionalitetsprincippet i dansk ret. Jeg har simpelthen svært ved at se, hvordan nogle opslag på nettet kan retfærdiggøre det. Beviset er opslagene - ikke noget i lejligheden. Det virker mere som ren straf uden fagligt belæg. Jeg er også ret sikker på, at politiet har tiltvunget sig adgang til min kærestes telefon og derigennem slettet størstedelen af den optagede video. For der gik et par minutter, før de tog kameraerne ned (og tog dem med(!)). Hvorfor nedenstående video som den eneste ikke blev slettet, ved jeg ikke. Jeg har det godt, men er en anelse chokeret over politiets helt uproportionale og brutale fremfærd.

53K

b_1n0 retweeted

🏴‍☠️ The Pirate 🏴‍☠️

@Pinperepette

2 days ago

Trump incontra Putin e gli chiede: Putin, come fai a capire se uno è un grande statista? Putin risponde: Faccio una sola domanda intelligente. Se sa rispondere, è qualificato. Ti faccio un esempio. Chiama Xi Jinping. Xi, tuo padre e tua madre hanno un bambino. Non è tuo fratello né tua sorella. Chi è? Xi risponde: Quel bambino sono io. Putin si gira verso Trump: Hai visto? Trump torna a casa impressionato e chiama Zelensky. Zelensky, tuo padre e tua madre hanno un bambino. Non è tuo fratello né tua sorella. Chi è? Non lo so. Zelensky consulta mezzo mondo. Alla fine gli consigliano di chiamare Meloni. Presidente Meloni, se tuo padre e tua madre hanno un bambino e quel bambino non è tuo fratello né tua sorella, chi è? Ma sono io, ovviamente. Zelensky corre da Trump. Presidente, ho trovato la risposta! È Giorgia Meloni! Trump fa il suo sorrisetto furbo. Ti ho fregato, Zelensky... la tua risposta è completamente sbagliata... Come sarebbe? Il bambino è Xi Jinping! (palesemente letta ieri e riadattata, ma mi ha fatto morire)