BREAKING: Federal Court Rules Amish Can Be Forcibly Injected By Vaccine Mandates- That Means Everybody Else As Well!
Alex Jones Responds, "The Supreme Court MUST Come In & Block This!"
🔴WATCH ALEX JONES LIVE NOW:
https://t.co/ITVeYvrH6t
Il faut qu'on parle de Chat Control, parce que ça se joue cette semaine et que presque personne ne comprend de quoi il s'agit.
En clair : l'UE veut autoriser le scan de vos messages privés. Vos conversations WhatsApp, vos mails, vos DMs. Pas ceux d'un suspect. Ceux de tout le monde, en permanence, par défaut.
Le prétexte est imparable, et c'est ça le piège : « protéger les enfants ». Personne ne peut être contre. C'est exactement pour ça que c'est l'outil parfait. On ne vous fera jamais avaler une surveillance de masse au nom de la surveillance de masse. On vous la fait avaler au nom des enfants, du terrorisme, de la désinformation. Toujours une cause que vous n'oserez pas contester.
Comprenez bien la mécanique en deux temps.
Aujourd'hui c'est la version « douce » : les plateformes ont le droit de scanner, sur la base du volontariat, les messages non chiffrés. Anodin en apparence. C'est le pied dans la porte.
Ensuite vient la vraie version, celle en négociation : le scan obligatoire, y compris de vos messages chiffrés, analysés directement sur votre téléphone avant même d'être envoyés. Plus de 500 cryptographes ont signé une lettre disant que c'est techniquement infaisable sans créer des failles de sécurité exploitables par n'importe quel hacker ou État hostile. Vous cassez le chiffrement pour tout le monde, y compris pour les criminels que vous prétendez traquer.
Et le pire n'est même pas là.
Le vrai danger n'est pas que les technocrates de Bruxelles vous surveillent demain. Ils sont probablement trop mous pour ça. Le danger, c'est qu'ils construisent l'infrastructure. Une fois que scanner les messages de tout le monde est devenu normal, légal, opérationnel — le rail est posé. Et sur ce rail roulera tout ce qui vient après. Le jour où une crise portera au pouvoir des gens sans scrupules, ils n'auront rien à inventer. La machine sera déjà là, clé en main.
Aucune infrastructure de surveillance n'est jamais restée cantonnée à son usage d'origine. Aucune. C'est une loi de la nature administrative : un outil construit pour X finit toujours par servir à Y.
Ce qui rend ce texte dangereux, ce n'est pas ce qu'il fait aujourd'hui. C'est ce qu'il rend possible pour toujours.
Le vote décisif est jeudi. Le dernier verrou.
From late 2026, synthetic folic acid will be added to almost every loaf of bread, every pack of flour, every pizza base in the UK.
No opt-out. No label warning. No conversation about who it might harm.
Here's what the headlines aren't telling you. 🧵
🇪🇺 Les français n'ont jamais donné leur accord pour être fichés et avoir un casier numérique. Jamais.
Malgré tout, on leur impose une architecture de surveillance à la chinoise grâce à la propagande des médias.
Partout en Europe, des citoyens, qu'ils soient experts de la tech ou du droit, sonnent l'alerte depuis des mois. Ni @EmmanuelMacron, ni @vonderleyen n'écoutent.
Pire ils accelèrent en brandissant la menace des "ingérences étrangères" et en attaquant frontalement la liberté d'expression.
Tous les prétendants à l'élection présidentielle, de @EPhilippe_LH à @J_Bardella, sont aux abonnés absents.
Les députés français, du PS jusqu'au RN, ont voté la #LoiMiller en en 1ère lecture, certains avouant qu'ils n'avaient pas tout compris (mais ils voteront tout de meme en 2e lecture).
Les sénateurs, eux, passent des heures de débat pour simplement amender à la marge en ajoutant une "liste noire" des plateformes.
Enfin, et le plus grave, chaque jour une nouvelle fuite de données vient confirmer que les services de l'Etat ne sont absolument pas sécurisés (ANTS en tête) et que nos identités sont déjà vendus aux pires criminels. Même l'application européenne présentée en grande pompe a été crackée en moins de 2 minutes.
Il est temps que ce délire cesse. Nous ne voulons pas de l'identité numérique et de cette convergence entre les cartels de la tech et le pouvoir qui fait peser un risque extrêmement grave sur nos vies.
🎥 @MeikeTerhorst (avocate)
@seblatombe
Palantir now has a $300 million deal with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which will use the software company’s technology to “manage farmland as geopolitical risks threaten global supply chains.”
It won’t be long before your only option is gene edited food. Grow your own.
It’s worth knowing Agenda 2030 and the globalist effort to reinstate feudalism at the global level is in opposition to the natural order and natural law. That is why ultimately it will fail.
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Hinter verschlossenen Türen verhandelt man in Genf über die fehlenden Puzzleteile für den Pandemievertrag, um die WHO zu einem Weltgesundheitsministerium zu machen.
Wir waren dort, damit die Verantwortlichen merken, dass ihnen jemand auf die Finger schaut. Nein zum Pandemievertrag - wir brauchen kein Weltgesundheitsministerium!
Even if everything goes perfectly —
Tanker out to Asia: 25 days.
Return trip empty: 25 days.
Then reload and sail again.
Best case: oil flows don’t normalize before July.
You’re celebrating a ceasefire that doesn’t move a single barrel.
BREAKING: Trump just stabbed RFK Jr. in the back.
He nominated a pro-vaccine UnitedHealthcare executive to run the CDC.
THIS ISN'T JUST BAD— this is wore than FAUCI.
👇👇👇
In a stunning move, President Trump has nominated Dr. Erica Schwartz, a retired Coast Guard Rear Admiral, former Deputy Surgeon General, and current UnitedHealthcare executive to be the next Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
While RFK Jr. has spent the past year trying to expose vaccine injuries and restore trust in public health, Trump has chosen a doctor whose entire career has been built on promoting mass vaccination programs. Dr. Schwartz helped lead COVID testing efforts during Trump’s first term and previously wrote federal policies on pandemic flu, anthrax, and smallpox vaccinations.
Even more concerning: She currently serves as President of Insurance Solutions at UnitedHealthcare one of the largest health insurance giants in America and sits on the board of other healthcare companies.
This is not just a rejection of RFK Jr.’s agenda. This is a clear signal that Big Pharma and the traditional public health establishment are fighting back and they just got a major win inside the Trump administration.
RFK Jr. is now publicly forced to “look forward to working with her,” but behind the scenes, this nomination looks like a direct demotion of his influence.
The question every America First supporter should be asking is simple:
If Trump was elected to drain the swamp and fix the corruption in public health, why is he putting a career vaccine advocate and UnitedHealthcare executive in charge of the agency that controls vaccine policy for 330 million Americans?
This move raises serious doubts about whether real reform is still possible at the CDC.
🚨 SELECTIVE SERVICE “DRAFT” NOTICES ARE SHOWING UP IN MAILBOXES — AND PEOPLE ARE CONNECTING THE DOTS
“Lil bro going to World War 3.”
A guy opens mail sent to his little brother… and it’s from the Selective Service System.
“MEN 18-25: UPDATE YOUR INFO.”
He opens it and it’s asking for everything:
name, address, Social Security.
He’s convinced his brother is being registered for the draft.
Most people don’t even think about this system until something like this shows up.
If this is “normal”… why does it feel like a warning?
Un grandissimo applauso a #naturasì che anche in pandemenza si è distinta per non aver obbligato i dipendenti a inocularsi il siero genico sperimentale e gli ha anche pagato i tamponi.
Trump's pick to head the CDC, Erica Schwartz, would likely be a disaster.
Schwartz led nationwide Covid-19 vaccine deployment and her long track record of directly issuing rights-crushing civilian and military vaccine mandates, including mandating injection of smallpox, anthrax, and flu vaccines into U.S. Forces, and discipling those that refused, reflects she lacks the basic ethics and morals to lead the CDC.
This agency does not need another cheerleader for industry; it needs a regulator over industry.
Her prior promotion, let alone mandates, of nearly a dozen different vaccines leave little hope she will objectively oversee CDC’s vaccine program which has, between 1986 and the 2026, gone from 3 injections to 29 injections, including in utero, by an infant’s first birthday, while chronic childhood disease has gone from under 10% to over 40% of children, most related to immune system dysregulation.
SOURCES:
For examples of Schwartz mandating vaccines, see:
https://t.co/CzaVaPLDNA
https://t.co/g3l8HWVLyN
https://t.co/IBlW7kSOfe
For increase in vaccine schedule, see:
https://t.co/cyCIINk92l; https://t.co/eILfr2FUJA (https://t.co/XHXxt8SQIO); https://t.co/pWmpb50XVo (https://t.co/DtRqnwfp65). The 29 injections in 2026 only include routine vaccines and the Covid-19 vaccine. Also see table on page 37 of Vacines, Amen.
For rise in chronic health, see:
https://t.co/4NfPxZNdkh (https://t.co/guZorU5jOu)(“According to data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) [1979-1981] over two million children under 17 years (3.8%) are afflicted by chronic conditions that cause some limitation of activ-ity.”); https://t.co/PSkLotGVm9 (https://t.co/IQr40hF4GK) (“Data from the National Health Interview Survey indicate that the prevalence of activity-lim-iting chronic conditions among children under age 17 years doubled between 1960 and 1981, from 1.8 to 3.8 per cent.”); https://t.co/hovGkzgRpo (https://t.co/YX9zR9Rj6H) (Among “children younger than 18 years who were included in the 1992-1994 National Health Interview Survey … [a] significant proportion of children, estimated at 6.5% of all US children, experienced some degree of disability.”); https://t.co/Fs66MifHLu (https://t.co/nuGSyYRgkW) (“Chronic diseases are defined broadly as conditions that last 1 year or more and require ongoing medical attention or limit activities of daily living or both.”); https://t.co/JRVlTEWxOO (https://t.co/RWJdVhijPZ) (The 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health found that: “An estimated 43% of US children (32 million) currently have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions assessed, increasing to 54.1% when overweight, obesity, or being at risk for developmental delays are included.”); https://t.co/Uw3WIGamt4 (https://t.co/BXWDTdredC) (Only considering a “condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” or a “functional/ activity limitation related to a condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” from the National Health Interview Survey data it found that children falling into this category “has risen from 22.57% in 1999/2000 to 30.21% in 2017/2018”); https://www.cdc. gov/school-health-conditions/chronic-conditions/index.html (https://t.co/mtMYd5bfUc) (“In the United States, more than 40% of school-aged children and adolescents have at least one chronic health condition”); See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources.
For relationship of chronic health issues to immune system dysregulation, see among other sources:
https://t.co/74V5QjE8MO; https://t.co/NpiHhocjio (https://t.co/i7CSzDuBsn); https://t.co/WbNXbZ9rsV (https://t.co/ZKuQqJi3pz); https://t.co/RziRLaE6hO (https://t.co/HfNSe5RJeR); https://t.co/RVOKOU0h8L (https://t.co/aScYnpwZ45); https://t.co/R9E0DALVIU (https://t.co/yWZr7CJKvN); https://t.co/Kq3CR19uBf (https://t.co/qlqHxKBdns). See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources.
https://t.co/46ogevmPX0
De EU bant de gloeilamp uit en verplicht ons 100% over te schakelen naar LED-lampen. Daar kleven gezondheidsrisico’s aan: LED-verlichting verstoort onze biologische klok en verhoogt daarmee de kans op slaapproblemen en op allerlei fysieke en mentale aandoeningen.
Tijdens het debat over “hernieuwbare energie” pleitte ik voor een onderzoek naar deze risico’s, voor een einde aan de energietransitie en voor keuzevrijheid. De minister stelde zich op als uitvoeringsorgaan van de EU.👇🏻
The Electricity bill is the cheap part.
A Swiss research group tested 13 professional induction cooktops & found that most EXCEEDED even the already-high 1998 ICNIRP maximum exposure limits when a person stood close to the stove.
For the worst-case compliant device: current density in tissue exceeded ICNIRP limits by up to 24 dB..
A FACTOR OF 16.
The brain tissue of young children: overexposed by a factor of 2
The CNS of a fetus: can exceed general public limits entirely if the mother cooks at normal working distance.
And this happened on devices that had PASSED the official safety test.
Why?
Because the IEC 62233 compliance standard, the test that certifies your stove as "SAFE", measures the AC magnetic field at 300mm (1 foot) from the cabinet edge.
You don't cook from 1 foot away.
Your abdomen is at 0mm.
Your hands are at 50mm.
Your child's head is at cooktop height.
At 300mm: COMPLIANT
At 0mm: 16x OVER THE LIMIT
The test is designed to PASS not to protect.
And that's before you consider that the ICNIRP limits themselves are already deeply inadequate.
ICNIRP limits are set to prevent ACUTE effects.. enough induced current to directly stimulate a nerve.
They don't account for chronic, non-thermal biological effects.
Reba Goodman & Martin Blank showed magnetic field biological effects occur at 14 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE below the thermal threshold ICNIRP uses as its baseline.
The WHO IARC classified ELF AC magnetic fields.. the exact type induction stoves emit at 20 kHz, as a Group 2B possible carcinogen in 2002.
ICNIRP's response in 2010 was to RELAX the reference levels.
So when the study says your stove exceeds limits by a factor of 16.. That's 16x over a number that's already orders of magnitude too permissive for chronic daily exposure.
You're not cooking on a stove.
You're standing in front of an industrial ELF AC magnetic field generator.
EVERY SINGLE DAY.
But sure.
The electricity bill is the part to worry about.