@Jonesy_FT@freddie2479@botol_angin@MercedesAMGF1 I have to agree with you, I think the strategists should tell them what they should do and if they disagree and ask to do something different that is on them. Shouldn't be asking what do you think.
@SkySportsF1 He's just doing it because he can. He wouldn't have bothered had it been Alonso in front of him, he gained nothing from doing it but it is within the rules. He could have left the pits sooner if he wanted more time on track. It's all mind games and ego. Non story
@SkySportsF1 If it was Mercedes(which it probably was) here is a little clue as to why. Literally the only team who could lose out to ferrari as a result of a new power unit. It is very easy to be friendly and 'sporting' with little at stake!
@chimney1878@nickbriggs72@g19ppa The difference it makes is to protect the main goal mouth. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by doing shooting drills in the main goal. Having said that it depends if the home team were allowed to or not? Pitch protection rules are in place but can be difficult to enforce!
@GrantMcDermid87@FalkirkFC Literally general labourer/ dogs body! Why not call it that instead of Groundsperson? Obviously we have all done a lot to help around the stadium but to have things like that in your JD is poor whilst saying groundsperson!
@ChesneyBH @JOEWILLS13 You would lose less money rescheduling a match than heating it for days to get it on. Very few games get called off so no justification. Most of the clubs that have it in D1 have mainly been at a higher level when it was installed.