Coding from the age of 7.
Learning Godot/Flutter/Dart/Kotlin.
Tinker with RaspberryPi/ZeroW/Pico/W.
Expect irreverence.
Not always serious.
π΄σ §σ ’σ ·σ ¬σ ³σ ΏπΊπ¦
@Techgnostik@JamesHoffmann3@TaylorOgan The maps are prior knowledge which makes driving much, much safer but it can drive without them. And keeping them up to date isn't and issue either, neither is coping with maps which may be slightly out of date. We all drive better on familiar roads, right. This is no different.
Driving at over 100 in a 50, holding a mobile phone with both hands and not looking where you are going, nearly causing 2 or 3 serious collisions. The trajectory of this "testing" is heading to a fatality.
@Techgnostik@JamesHoffmann3@TaylorOgan You are completely wrong. It requires proper training and oversight, sometimes with 2 safety engineers in a vehicle at all times. The safety score is a joke and can be easily gamed. Just look at the antics of people who have FSD Beta - letting it run red lights, go the wrong way
@Techgnostik@JamesHoffmann3@TaylorOgan They are being negligent to a greater degree than Uber and to a much, much larger scale, as Mahmood points out in that video which you will never watch because you're too ignorant.
@Techgnostik@JamesHoffmann3@TaylorOgan It's a bunch of discreet NNs feeding into a C++ control program. The cars are going straight, not hard to predict. If they're having difficulty predicting their future position then FML they are in trouble. If they're having difficulty with crappy sensors then FML ditto.
@Cornpop_BadDude@FrizzellH@SpaceGator420 Yep. A rope across the neck is nasty. Even if there was only a 1% chance, that's still too much. This is what it can do. Would you be happy for your child to have this done to them?