bakeboi

:(

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@peachy_padme @puppyochako @Bullsin_7 @OP_senju no it just reminded him. she looks very pregnant in this clip its obvious

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@RaisinsDEtre @BMafia056 @DrewFoxingt0n @MrBiberty @dyingscribe I wouldn't be against that.

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@waltjessexo he doesn't believe in a racial hierarchy but is race insensitive so he has no problem repeating stereotypes

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@snowmistspiders Story wise not good but the fight scene was fire. And the confrontation was cool too

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@speeziespeezie @Maninn50 @Your0perator @MrBrio171 nothing you says makes it review bombing. not understanding media to then rate it a 1 is not review bombinb

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@speeziespeezie @Maninn50 @Your0perator @MrBrio171 it was fine to you. not others.

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@speeziespeezie @Maninn50 @Your0perator @MrBrio171 review bombing is only when it is a coordinated attack, particularly with a piece of media they haven't actually consumed. Just because someone rates a show in a way you don't personally like doesn't mean it is review bombing. words have meaning

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@speeziespeezie @Maninn50 @Your0perator @MrBrio171 no that just how people rate. if they like it with no major issues a 10. if they dont, a 1. the other ones for minor deductions. Review bombing is a completely different subject

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@speeziespeezie @Maninn50 @Your0perator @MrBrio171 yes

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@speeziespeezie @Maninn50 @Your0perator @MrBrio171 well yes bc more people hate it than like it thats how it works

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 This is akin to arguing against a flat eather. Using concepts and words you clearly don’t know the meaning to. Also “physiology” 🥀case in point

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 correcting your elementary view on 'statistics' is considered deflecting. lol. whatever helps you sleep at night

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 You can't use 'statistics' as a buzzword. It actually has a meaning. If 'statistics' applied to this situation, most of the votes would be concentrated and then trend either upwards or downwards. The simple answer is that rating a show isn't a science. It's psychology

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 again that goes back to the argument the other guy could not comprehend. 23 percent of ratings are 10s. Now, with how flawed the episode is, is that indicative of how good the episode really is, or is it being manipulated by overrating? Your argument flipped back at you.

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 I must be dense because what is your point. You have got to articulate it to me bc I have no idea how it pertains to this conversation. in full please

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 again why an average of 7? why not an average of 3?

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 so ur asking a hypothetical thst has no bearing on the conversation. odd

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@TokyoOnTheRocks @Kristo67501283 i dont ever recall mentioning anything about the right wing. odd

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@JackE_721 @Kristo67501283 a 5 would be average

[bakeboi @bakeboi1]

@Kroza06 @Kristo67501283 No, you're projecting your own rigid perception a onto others. You can want the boys to win. Not in the way the show depicted. Which in turn causes you to dislike it. If this is for every single plot point, by your logic, giving it a 1 is valid. Just like the opposite for a 10