Daniel Hart Baker

Vision Scientist at Apple. Interested in binocular visual perception in humans. Mostly @[email protected]

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

We have made available some repositories of example markdown scripts, as well as a ‘cookbook’ of useful tips here: https://t.co/NBDfzrRt3L Hopefully this will help others to develop the necessary skills 4/6

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

All of our contributing authors were extremely cooperative, and clearly saw the benefit of their work being reproducible. We think this is how all scientific results should be reported. However we recognise several barriers to wider adoption, chiefly expertise and time 3/6

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

The question now is what we should do next. We have a really nice pipeline for automatically building markdown files on Github. But the process of making papers reproducible is time consuming.

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

@mariannazvg @PhDVoice @AcademicEEG If you can, take along a cap and a tub of gel to pass around. Physical props help learning, and this is generally not possible with other neuroimaging methods. I tried doing a live demo once too, but that was a bit unpredictable!

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

A bit more about this, in case anyone is interested. Such a cool technique.

https://t.co/GPPkP3lKj7

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

@tom_hartley @KatjaKornysheva Oh yeah, this does look neat, especially for clinical/developmental applications. The key is having a really robust objective measure, as that means any criterion-related issues should go away

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

@EgyptMcr I'm holding out for 22/02/2022!

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

Also available from @AmazonUK

https://t.co/raHVyehuvI

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

Also available (currently with a 12% discount) from: @blackwellbooks

https://t.co/GX6H3MNX0L

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

@j_greenwood There's a detection threshold condition in the paper below on 'power contours' (see Fig 4). Basically power does keep increasing as you add more trials, which I think justifies the classic small-N psychophysics study design. https://t.co/im2vhOdjLB

[Daniel Hart Baker @bakerdh]

@RoseboomWarrick I think it’s a category error. In true 2AFC the alternatives are different stimuli that you choose between. But in the yes/no paradigm there are two alternative responses. Very easy to confuse the two, and that’s before you get into paradoxes, such as…