Guys inget Sosok Oknum aparat yang ngomong kasar dan Intimidatif sewaktu demonstrasi mahasiswa di Jambi ini dia orangnya.
Kau jangan main main dengan rakyat.
Gercep banget keren langsung ketemu infonya 🙌
Semua bisnis SANGAT TIDAK MAU punya HQ di Indo karena:
1. PENGADILAN berisi gerombolan preman dan bandit,
2. BEA CUKAI berisi gerombolan preman dan bandit,
3. POLISI berisi gerombolan preman dan bandit,
4. PERIZINAN berisi gerombolan preman dan bandit,
GOBLOK TOLOL SEKALI kalau disuruh ke Indo tapi gerombolan pejabat preman dan bandit buas berliur berseragamnya dibiarkan liar. Gerombolan overpopulasi hama tikus jijik membludak berkembang biak massal ini harus dipestisida-musnah-tumpas-genosida-libas-habiskan massal dulu kalau perlu dikumpulkan dan ditembak mati dan dibunuh dan kepalanya dipotong dan aset rumah / properti hasil korupsinya dirampas kayak zaman Sulla dan kalau perlu SEKOLAH KEDINASAN-nya dibakar dan dibubarkan dan ormas alumni sekolah kedinasannya dibubarkan dan dana APBN nya dibubarkan dan sekolah kedinaaannya dibangun ulang. Beneran. Kalo gw yang ngatur minimal harus ada 10.000 orang kapbir preman berseragam yang ditangkap dan kalau perlu dibunuh ditembak mati dan kalau kabur di drone strike. Tumpas, tumpas, tumpas, tumpas bersih, ganti, ganti, ganti, ganti.
Anyways. Iya kalo dari observasi gw, kayaknya rankingnya berurut empat itu.
1. Pengadilan dan kejaksaan dan arbitrase (termasuk enforcement kontrak dan utang), lalu
2. Bea cukai, lalu
3. Polisi dan keamanan dari intimidasi bersenjata preman buas berseragam dan preman buas tidak berseragam, lalu
4. Perizinan dan pemda, lalu
5. Barulah kebijakan pajak, lalu
6. Barangkali perihal nyari funding dan utang.
Inilah kenapa semua perusahaan di Singapura.
#IDNWatch 🇮🇩: Today, hundreds of students gathered in central Jakarta to protest government policies and corruption.
CORRUPTION CONTINUES TO FRONT AND CENTER IN INDONESIA.
Formr trade Minister M Lutfi's obsessive+endless anti Singapore attacks r mind blowing. I servd w Lutfi for a decade under Pres SBY when he workd hard to advance RI Singapore cooperation on trade + investment (Lutfi was minister for both) .. I dont know what is happening to him, and why the sudden change of heart to wreck his many contributions to RI Singapore relations, which is so unlike him, but i sincerely hope he is okay ..
Pandu Sjahrir, the prominent Indonesian wealth fund executive who has publicly supported MSCI’s scrutiny of the nation’s stock market, is the co-owner of a brokerage sanctioned in connection with a stock-market manipulation probe https://t.co/LZXhV0Ay7X
‼️ ALERTA ALERTA
19.06
ORMAS bersenjata mulai masuk, dipersilahkan oleh parcok. Malah parcoknya bikin barikade tebel banget, jadi massa yang masih di lokasi terkurung.
TARIK MUNDUR TENTARA DALAM MENGHADANG AKSI MASSA!
Pantauan langsung 14:22 WIB, Jakarta. Aksi massa rakyat di Jakarta dihadapkan dengan mobilisasi tentara. Prajurit-prajurit ditempatkan di beberapa titik sekitaran Bundaran HI, gang-gang dan beberapa objek vital.
UUD 1945 membedakan fungsi TNI dan Polri dengan jelas. TNI ditempatkan sebagai alat negara di bidang pertahanan, sedangkan Polri menjaga keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat serta menegakkan hukum. Pemisahan ini adalah salah satu hasil penting Reformasi setelah pengalaman panjang keterlibatan militer dalam kehidupan sipil.
Demonstran bukan kombatan. Kritik bukan ancaman militer. Jalan raya bukan medan perang. Konstitusi menjamin kebebasan berserikat, berkumpul, dan mengeluarkan pendapat. UU Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 juga menempatkan pengamanan penyampaian pendapat di muka umum sebagai tanggung jawab kepolisian.
✅ Challenge accepted.
The Quran, considered “perfect, divine, and free of contradictions” by Muslims, is nevertheless a contradictory work containing glaring human errors. Here is just ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE (which, incidentally, involves no fewer than three contradictions!), a more in-depth analysis of which can be found in my book 100 Contradictions and Scientific Errors in the Quran.
In the Quran, Allah sometimes recounts the same historical event twice, in two different surahs, as when He describes, in two different places in the Quran (Surah 3 and Surah 19), the moment when He has His angels announce to Zechariah that he will have a son: John. However, the human author hiding behind Allah's pen made the mistake, in each of these two surahs, of describing this event using verbatim quotations, that is, dialogues, and more specifically, statements made in the first person. Indeed, a perfect God who knows everything—and therefore knows the exact words spoken during a specific historical event—should not present TWO CONTRADICTORY VERSIONS OF ONE AND THE SAME FIRST-PERSON STATEMENT, which He should quote identically whenever He reproduces it in different surahs of the Quran.
So, what did Zechariah reply when Allah conveyed to him the announcement of John's birth? According to verse 40 of Surah 3, Allah states that Zechariah, surprised, replied: “My Lord, how will I have a boy when I have reached old age and my wife is barren?” Yet, in verse 8 of Surah 19, Allah states that Zechariah, at that very same moment, said: “My Lord, how will I have a boy when my wife is barren and I have reached extreme old age?” These two Quranic quotations, from Surahs 3 and 19, supposedly reproduce the same words spoken by Zechariah during one single, specific historical event. They should therefore have been identical, word for word. Yet these two quotations reverse the order of the two arguments, while also differing by an adjective that appears in one version but is absent from the other.
You must answer these three simple and binary questions to demonstrate that Allah does not contradict Himself in the Quran:
➜ 1. When Zechariah, surprised by the announcement Allah had conveyed to him, replied, did he say “I have reached old age” or “I have reached EXTREME old age”?
➜ 2. And did Zechariah mention his old age BEFORE or AFTER mentioning his wife's barrenness?
The factual and historical account presented in Surah 3 contradicts and invalidates the one presented in Surah 19, even though both are supposedly equally divine and truthful.
Furthermore, what answer did Zechariah receive to his request? Here again, there is a contradiction! The divine response that follows is not quite the same in the two accounts. For while, in verse 41 of Surah 3, Allah indicates that the response begins with “Your sign is that you will not be able to speak to the people for three days” (أَيَّامٍ / ayyāmin), the version of the beginning of the response in verse 10 of Surah 19 is “Your sign is that you will not be able to speak to the people for three nights” (لَيَالٍ / layālin). Did Allah therefore have two different recollections of the dialogue with Zechariah recorded in Surahs 3 and 19 of the Quran?
➜ 3. So which was the correct expression addressed to Zechariah: “three days” or “three nights”?
The issue is not whether “three days” and “three nights” are equivalent in duration. These are supposed to be verbatim quotations describing one and the same specific statement. We should therefore find exactly the same words in both versions, in Surah 3 and Surah 19. The human author of the Quran made the mistake of recounting the same historical event multiple times while including first-person dialogue. And I have found other contradictions of the same kind in the Quran: involving Moses, Abraham, Mary the mother of Jesus, and others. I analyze them all in the chapter of my book 100 Contradictions and Scientific Errors in the Quran devoted to narrative contradictions.
Allah, who “neither errs nor forgets” (Surah 20, verse 52), should be capable of remembering His exact words, word for word, and therefore reproducing them word for word. Allah should not be imprecise or have two different recollections of the exact words He heard or spoke during one and the same event.
When I was Muslim, Surah 5:32 was my favorite verse to quote.
“Whoever kills a soul, it is as if he killed all of mankind.”
I put it in every debate. Every conversation about Islam and peace. It felt like the most beautiful verse in the Quran.
Then I read it slowly.
The verse doesn’t say Allah revealed this to Muhammad. It says: “We decreed upon the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL…”
Wait. Decreed where? When? I went looking.
Bro, then I found it.
Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5. A rabbinic commentary on Cain and Abel, written down around 200 AD like four centuries before the Quran. Rabbis discussed why Genesis says Abel’s “bloods” (plural) cry out and concluded: whoever destroys one soul, it is as if he destroyed an entire world.
Insane that it was word for word, with the exact same context. Bro, the same Cain and Abel story it’s attached to in Surah 5.
What I thought was the most beautiful verse in the Quran turned out to be a rabbi’s classroom commentary...
Literally, that’s when the question changed for me. It went from “isn't this verse beautiful?” to: What the heck is a rabbinic homily doing inside a book that claims to be the eternal, uncreated speech of God?!
Because there are only two options. Either Allah quoted the rabbis. Or a man in Arabia heard Jewish teachers and repeated what they said...
The crazy part is, the Bible predicted men would do this. “I am against the prophets who steal my words from one another.” ( Jeremiah 23:30)
That was the start of my journey toward Christ. I stopped defending the borrowed word of the Quran.
I found the Living Word.
PRAISE MY KING JESUS CHRIST, I’M FREE!
HEARTBREAKING: A church in Nigeria was stormed by Islamic terrorists who started shooting everyone in sight.
The congregants tried to escape in a panic, but were slaughtered or kidnapped by terrorists lying in wait outside.
Do not stop talking about the real genocide against Christians in Nigeria.
🚨 ÚLTIMA HORA: Un nuevo video muestra a islamistas en África matando a cristianos a machetazos.
No dejen de hablar sobre la matanza de cristianos en Nigeria.
This year alone, more Christians have been killed by Muslims in Nigeria than Gazans in three years of war.
Not a single Muslim or pro-Palestinian activist has protested like they do for Gaza. Weird.