Next Thursday you can vote for Reform UK and deliver real change.
Follow and retweet. Need 300 followers
Who willing to help me out with that.
Reform is our future.💪💪💪
At this point, I believe I have two choices:
Stay silent and watch my children possibly get raped, beheaded, stabbed - or at best forced into a burka.
Or demand remigration and be called a racist.
I’ll take racist.
"The UK is racist!"
The UK is so insanely non-racist that you have to reach the point of men being beheaded by Sudanese jihadis and tens of thousands of British girls being raped and tortured before we even consider doing something about it.
🚨Sir Mark Rowley has just told me London will be “less safe” by the end of the year because he’ll have to lose 500-700 officers from doing frontline jobs after Sir Sadiq Khan blocked plans to use Palantir AI
Q - You wanted to roll out AI provided by Palantir to try and speed up tasks in the Met like searching through reports, searching through phone data. Sadiq Khan, mayor of London, said, no, that's not happening. You've been blocked from doing it. So what does that mean?
ROWLEY: I'm having to shrink the Metropolitan Police because of our budget, so we've shrunk by 3,300 people in 3 years. We're going to lose another 1,150 people this year. We had a plan to avoid doing any damage to the policing of the streets by using technology to automate behind the scenes, as well as improving what officers could do. Now that's been blocked we're going to be taking between 500 and 700 officers out of frontline services equivalent…. 500 to 700 officers and staff who were part of delivering services to London, maybe from call handling through to street policing, we're going to have to reduce that. That will have an effect on the streets of London. That's why we were trying to do a sort of a sort of rapid tech procurement to make a difference for Londoners.”
SOPHY RIDGE: Will it make London less safe?
SIR MARK ROWLEY: “Well, we're going to be smaller at the end of the year. So it'll be less safe at the end of the year than it was otherwise.”
The House of Commons Justice Committee has delivered its verdict on the Government’s plans to slash our ancient right to trial by jury.
It is scathing — and will make tough reading for the Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary, @DavidLammy.
The Government has introduced the most sweeping constitutional reforms to the criminal justice system in years at breakneck speed, despite not having promised them in its manifesto. It seems to be allergic to scrutiny.
The Justice Secretary claims that curbing our precious right to jury trial will save Crown Court time and reduce the backlog of cases. Yet the Committee acknowledges that there is no concrete evidential basis for this claim. In fact, the Institute for Government has said the reforms would save only 2 per cent of court time, not the 20 per cent ministers have promised.
David Lammy’s 2017 review found that juries are one of the few parts of the criminal justice system where black and minority ethnic defendants do not face disproportionate outcomes. This Bill reduces the role of juries while simultaneously expanding that of the judiciary, despite only 1 per cent of Crown Court judges being black.
Back in December 2025, Lammy himself said the reforms would not be applied retrospectively. That is no longer the case. Defendants expecting a jury trial could now have their mode of trial changed without a hearing.
The Free Speech Union’s research has shown that those accused of speech-related offences are almost twice as likely to be found not guilty in the Crown Court before a jury than in a magistrates’ court without one.
Judges, lawyers, opposition MPs, Labour MPs, and even victims of crime have warned that David Lammy’s reforms will undermine public confidence in the criminal justice system.
We must defend our right to trial by jury.
Read the Justice Committee’s report below 👇
I still can’t believe I was banned from Britain for not being ‘conducive to the public good’.
Maybe I should’ve tried beheading someone instead of doing journalism.
The Justice Committee has given its verdict on Labour’s plans to restrict our ancient right to a jury trial.
It’s utterly damning.
It says there is NO evidence for David Lammy’s claim that judge only trials will take 20% less time than jury trials. 🧵
I am banned from entering the United Kingdom because I have been deemed to be "not conducive to the public good".
The Sudanese migrant who literally was cutting a man's head off in the middle of the street in Belfast was given refugee status and full financial benefits by the same government that banned me.
I have never seen a more glaring example of stupidity.
If you want to divide the Right & ensure Labour continue to destroy our country then vote Tory or Restore.
But if you actually want to take control of this country and turn it around then vote Reform.
Reform is the only party capable of saving Britain.
It is that simple.
I've been driving around the Scottish Highlands for a few days and I've noticed a big difference in towns compared to where I live in Devon.
In Devon, whenever you drive into a town you have to pay to park. That's before you spend anything in shops, bars, cafes etc.
Councils consider car drivers as the enemy. A mere cash cow. If you park - YOU PAY.
Hence, many people now avoid town centres like the plague or they severely limit the number of times they visit.
For the past few days I've stopped off in many towns across the North of Scotland. I've parked in council car parks and not once have I been confronted with a ticket machine, a barrier or an ANPR camera.
And guess what? I've actually been into shops, cafes, restaurants etc and spent money. In so doing, I've helped the businesses to do what they do best - Providing goods and services to their communities.
Communities free from paying extortionate amounts of money to local councils for the "privilege" of being able to park up and visit businesses who rely on their custom.
Councils "down South" should take notice.
If you price drivers out of towns, they stay away, businesses close and the town dies.
The evidence is everywhere.
(And yes, I know Internet shopping is another enemy of the High Street so I don't need to be informed about that).
In France there is a new activity that the Left is getting their knickers in a twist about.
Le Canon Français is running massive banquets. For about £70 you can have great food and drinks and spend time singing patriotic songs.
The “Far Left” is furious.
LFI says it has evidence of racist chanting, and of immigrant staff being insulted. With pork regularly on the menu, they say the feasts are purposely designed to exclude Muslims and vegetarians.
Meanwhile, everyday people who love France, love food and beer are having the time of their lives.
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.
Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.
It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.
“STOP POLICING LANGUAGE!”
Robert Jenrick was visibly frustrated on GMB this morning as he hit out at the host for obsessing over Nigel Farage’s words instead of focusing on Henry Nowak’s murder and the shocking police bodycam scandal.
After being relentlessly harangued about Nigel Farage’s “cold rage” comments following the murder of Henry Nowak, Jenrick hit back:
“I felt rage watching that video, and so did millions of people across this country.”
He was clearly sick of the deflection:
“I’m sick of people policing language and using that to obfuscate and not get to the heart of the issues and actually do something about it.”
Every time he tried to talk about the scandalous police response, the bodycam footage, the two-tier policing concerns, the failure to protect, the presenter dragged it straight back to what Farage said. Solutions? Barely mentioned.
It was painful to watch. The host wasn’t interested in the shocking treatment of Henry Nowak or fixing the serious problems that led to it. Just another gotcha on Farage.
Jenrick is right. Too many seem far more outraged by Nigel Farage’s words than by a young man being stabbed to death and the disturbing way the police handled it.
It’s infuriating, and they still don’t get it.
The Daily Mail has now published details from sentencing that almost no one has reported.
As Henry Nowak — bleeding from five stab wounds — tried to climb a commercial rubbish bin and over a fence to escape, Vickrum Digwa filmed him.
And taunted him.
“You’re not going to get away with this big man.”
Henry landed on top of a parked car on the other side of the fence. Digwa walked round and took close-up photos of him lying on the ground.
A home security camera then captured what may be the most chilling exchange in this entire case.
Henry: “I am dying.”
Digwa: “You’re not dying bro.”
Ten minutes later, Henry said: “You stabbed me.”
Digwa replied: “No, I didn’t.”
In the ten minutes that followed the stabbing, Vickrum Digwa did not call an ambulance. He filmed Henry for a full five minutes instead.
That clip was deemed too disturbing to be played in court.
Stop and process what that means. A judge and a jury sat through video of Digwa describing his blade in “loving terms,” through bodycam of Henry being handcuffed as he died, through pathologist evidence of the eight-centimetre chest wound — and the only piece of footage the court ruled too disturbing to show was the five minutes Vickrum Digwa spent filming an 18-year-old as he bled to death on a Southampton pavement.
The judge said it in sentencing: “You continued to make films of Henry suffering, ignoring much of his desperation at having been stabbed. You told him that had not happened, no doubt to convince others who were nearby.”
The lie Digwa told the police did not begin when officers arrived. It began ten minutes earlier, in Henry’s face, as Henry told him he was dying.
This is what Hampshire Police walked into. This is the man they believed when they got there. This is what the court has now formally established took place between the stabbing and Henry’s death.
The five-minute video exists. Henry’s family knows what is on it. The court knows what is on it. The public does not.
It is too disturbing to be shown.
But not too disturbing to have been done to him.
Henry — forever 18. 🤍
#JusticeForHenryNowak