Classic deflection. You dodged the actual point: how does a “trading setup” justify a native token with zero utility in the very place you trade — Futures? Sleeping well is great, but you’re sleeping on a gold mine that won’t let you spend its own gold.
If unified margin is your only selling point, every top-tier exchange already does that better — and actually gives their token a purpose. $BP isn’t part of your setup; it’s a paperweight sitting in your “safe” wallet.
But hey, if it takes 800 words to explain why a token belongs in your portfolio, maybe the token isn’t the problem — the logic is. Enjoy the nap, legend.
I just launched a random token on https://t.co/f5A9anwtTp. You can stake it on my platform; it offers zero yield, just some discounts on transaction fees. I also dropped an NFT that does the exact same thing.
Honestly, even this basic setup is more transparent than the current state of Backpack. Look at this screenshot: after all that hype, users are left with 'dust' rewards. Meanwhile, edgeX (EDGE) just launched with a $1.2B FDV and is already buying back 2.5M tokens daily to support its ecosystem.
It’s the same pattern: Backpack launches a product, lets it stagnate, and then moves on while the community holds the bag. They’d rather ignore their early supporters than put in the work that edgeX is doing right now. At least my 'worthless' token is honest about its utility—no fake promises, no abandoned users, just the fees you see
2,528,370.62 $EDGE has been permanently burned. The burn of buyback-acquired $EDGE has commenced, and buyback-acquired $EDGE will be permanently burned every 24 hours.
https://t.co/0Ywur2nCVJ