bart

Front End Developer • UX/UI/3D curious

[bart @bartbzd]

@prolific2u @ANOINTEDCHIEF And yet there is glimmer in your eyes when you see her stand up for herself in a situation that didn’t need your ‘masculine’ strength; like noticing and willfully correcting an incorrect receipt.

No inferior gender.. just inferior totality ‘thinking’.

[bart @bartbzd]

@SovereignIM @TellYourSonThis Yes, but without saying it to one another; following the intrinsic force to help one another understand the world and themselves, to themselves, like a mirror that spirals upward, ever fusing and dancing whole, akin to laces on a shoe. You are the reflection of yours.

[ORBIT @orbitrobotics]

The future has arrived!

After a long wait, we are finally ready to reveal our complete space humanoid HELIOS.

After two semesters of intense work, research and iteration, this is what we have to show.

4 arms. 4 hands. 1 vision. 1 dream.

[Dilum Sanjaya @DilumSanjaya]

Fun interactive science app ideas | Part 3

Played around with generating 3D biological structures and made an app to explore them interactively

UI Design
GPT Images 2

Code
Gemini 3.1 Pro

More demos ↓

[John Greenewald, Jr. @theblackvault]

Here is a thread of each of the UFO videos released today by the Department of War.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je ne pense pas qu'on réalise le tsunami qui arrive.

Ce que vous voyez là, ce n'est pas une démo de plus. C'est le premier domino d'une cascade qui va redéfinir ce que ça veut dire être humain au 21e siècle.

Pendant 200 ans, la révolution industrielle a automatisé la force brute. Mais la dextérité fine, le geste précis, l'adaptation à un environnement non standardisé, c'est resté la chasse gardée de l'humain. Casser un œuf. Plier une chemise. Réparer une fuite. Ce mur vient de tomber.

Étape 1 : les robots humanoïdes commencent vraiment à marcher. Pas des prototypes de salon, des machines qui exécutent des tâches manuelles complexes en autonomie, à vitesse réelle, avec un seul modèle pour tout. Le hardware suit la loi de Wright. Comptez 5 ans pour passer de 100K€ à 15K€ l'unité.

Étape 2 : toutes les tâches manuelles non créatives vont être automatisées. Cuisiner, nettoyer, ranger, jardiner, livrer, soigner, construire. Pas "certaines" tâches. La quasi-totalité du travail manuel répétitif que l'humanité produit depuis qu'elle est sortie de la savane.

Étape 3 : tout le monde aura un service 3 étoiles chez soi. Aujourd'hui, avoir un chef privé, un majordome, un kiné à domicile, c'est réservé à 0,01% de la population mondiale. Demain, c'est le standard. Le luxe va se démocratiser à une vitesse jamais vue dans l'histoire.

Étape 4 : la société va se réorganiser entièrement autour des robots. L'urbanisme, le droit, la fiscalité, l'éducation. Tout est designé autour d'une contrainte qui disparaît : la rareté du travail humain. Comparable en ampleur à l'arrivée de l'électricité, sauf que ça prendra 20 ans, pas 80.

Étape 5 : la place de l'humain est à retrouver. Si une machine cuisine mieux, soigne mieux, code mieux, à quoi ça sert d'être humain ? La réponse n'est pas dans la productivité. Elle est dans l'expérience subjective, la création de sens, le lien, le jeu, le risque, la transmission.

Étape 6 : abondance totale de biens et de services. Le coût marginal de produire un repas, un vêtement, un logement, un soin tend vers zéro. Marx pensait que c'était la révolution prolétarienne qui apporterait l'abondance. Erreur. C'est le capitalisme et la technologie qui le font.

Étape 7 : on réalise que la vie est un énorme jeu. Toutes les civilisations qui ont atteint un seuil d'abondance ont basculé vers la culture, le sport, la philosophie, l'art. Sauf que cette fois, ce n'est pas 0,1% de la population qui accède au jeu. C'est 100% des 10 milliards d'humains.

Étape 8 : le but devient de coloniser l'intégralité du cosmos. Une espèce qui a résolu sa subsistance et qui dispose de robots autonomes ne reste pas confinée à une bille bleue. Mars dans 15 ans. La ceinture d'astéroïdes dans 30. Les lunes de Jupiter dans 50. L'univers observable contient 2 trillions de galaxies. C'est notre terrain de jeu.

Le 20e siècle nous a appris à craindre la technologie. Le 21e va nous apprendre à la chérir. Parce que c'est elle, et elle seule, qui nous sort de la condition de primates obligés de travailler 40h par semaine pour ne pas mourir de faim.

Les luddites ont toujours perdu. Ils perdront encore. Et heureusement.

L'humanité n'a jamais été aussi proche de devenir ce qu'elle est censée être : une espèce de joueurs, d'explorateurs, de créateurs, libérée de la nécessité, partie à la conquête des étoiles.

Le tsunami arrive. Ne le subissez pas. Surfez-le.

[Melissa Chen @MsMelChen]

Remember the harrowing China Eastern Airlines crash that saw the jet nosedive almost vertically into the mountainside?

According to a new NTSB report, the fuel control switches for both engines were moved (almost simultaneously) from "run" to "cutoff." Engine speeds dropped, the autopilot was disengaged, and the plane entered a steep dive and inverted roll. The switches cannot be moved accidentally on a 737 - they require deliberate action. No restart attempts were recorded.

This fact has only just come to light via an NTSB response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by a Chinese citizen.

It strongly suggests deliberate cockpit action, which is strikingly similar to what happened with the Air India Flight 171 crash last year where one passenger miraculously survived the burning wreck.

The incidents occurred a few years apart involving different aircraft types (737 vs. 787 Dreamliner), but both appear to be caused by pilot action.

The key comparison here though is how China Eastern/Chinese authorities versus Air India/Indian authorities handled public communication, investigation updates, and disclosures.

How China 🇨🇳 handled it:

The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) issued only a very brief preliminary report in April 2022 with scant details. No meaningful updates followed. China failed to release required annual progress reports (per ICAO Annex 13 standards) on the 3rd and 4th anniversaries (2025 and 2026).

When asked for information, the CAAC cited risks to "national security and social stability" as the reason for withholding reports. No final report has been issued even >4 years later. The cockpit voice recorder data was handed over to China; the US NTSB did not retain copies.

How India 🇮🇳 handled it:

India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released a preliminary factual report on July 12, 2025 (within ~30 days), detailing the switch movements, FDR/CVR data summary, and sequence of events.

This was the first time India performed full black-box analysis domestically. The report was shared publicly and with international parties (NTSB, Boeing). The investigation followed ICAO Annex 13 rules with accredited representatives from the U.S. and manufacturer.

As of early 2026, the AAIB stated the probe is ongoing (not finalized), with the final report expected "very soon" or within 2026. Indian courts criticized the aviation authorities for "irresponsible" early media leaks suggesting pilot error and for selective/piecemeal information release.

Families have demanded full black-box data and more accountability. However, the preliminary report was public and detailed, and the process involved international oversight.

India and Air India were significantly more transparent than the Chinese. The Indian authorities released a substantive preliminary report quickly, followed ICAO norms more closely, involved international experts, and faced domestic accountability mechanisms (courts, media, families).

China’s approach - years of silence, skipped reports, and reliance on external FOIA for key data - is a massive cover-up.

It's really not unlike how they handled covid so please don't tell me how they are responsible global actors.

It's basically the same pattern - limited transparency, delayed or withheld information, and prioritization of "stability" or control over full public and international disclosures.

[bart @bartbzd]

l’ura reflexes

[bart @bartbzd]

@maximum More chances at a CE, if not all three. Net positive overall, more work for you I agree.

[jimmy @JIMMYEDGAR]

they finally proved my theory that i have been banging on about for years

thoughts are liquid in the ether and once they condense into quantum rain clouds, they precipitate into our visible universe as realities

essentially what its saying is that thoughts when thunketh so strongly, so convicted, with so much believe... they have no choice but to thunderstorm in 3D

[bart @bartbzd]

@Warcraft

[bart @bartbzd]

@Ridiculus1337 @Luckyone961 sounds like a personal problem

[bart @bartbzd]

@DrkPhoenix6913 @Courndogg @towelthetank Sounds innocent. After everything you’ve setup across multiple platforms, YouTube, Twitch, Patreon, Discord, Reddit, let me just throw the towel in, yeah. Totally makes sense.

Sucks we have free options I guess.

[bart @bartbzd]

@_sakuria This is how you do things; well done!

[bart @bartbzd]

@aluraye I blame him. He did it to himself. You need full context to understand the subtleness of what he did here, which you don’t have, but he did it to himself.

[bart @bartbzd]

@Archimtiros That reaction says more than anything he could have said. Someone working honestly wouldn’t throw the towel in after just a day or two of criticism. 🤷‍♂️

[bart @bartbzd]

@Luckyone961 Karma will sort it out, just an unlucky one..

Here’s to ElvUI Midnight release, what the real gamers use👌🏼

[bart @bartbzd]

@Luckyone961 There are no limits when it comes to greed I suppose; a sad display from someone that is usually a great contributor to the scene. It’s one thing with profiles, but to rehash someone else’s breakfast and say you made it (hell, selling it on the street), leaves a real sour taste.

[bart @bartbzd]

@emmanuel_2m Great showcase; creatives in shambles, but this is so much faster. Really interesting to see where we’ll be in 5-10 years

[bart @bartbzd]

@CuffinTheDip2xs @MarioNawfal M+ dungeons