Barthélemy R.

Traditionalist in principle
Progressive in movement.
🇺🇸

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@WriterClarke @FIFAWorldCup @outsmarthouston @Dr_NassMohamed Marx was right in describing the effects of globalization. The liberal agenda does the dirty work of capitalism, destroying cultures in the name of false progress. They want the world to be one big Seattle, filled with nonbinary people drinking expensive coffee and eating avocado

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@barrydistrict The best part is the journalist's inability to state the glaringly obvious: this person is a man.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

The best part is the journalist's inability to state the glaringly obvious: this person is a man.

[Barry District News @barrydistrict]

Transgender woman masturbated in front of hospital nurses https://t.co/QtcvmO5eto

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@KTHopkins Unless you want to pray the rosary in public—in that case, Scotland will throw you in jail...

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@hriengaalkn The trans cause is grounded in a major cognitive fallacy in which self-acceptance becomes possible only through self-mutilation. This represents the pinnacle of a Gnostic worldview in which we are no longer our bodies, but merely our inner selves.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@NormalGaysYT @brad_polumbo @clarksonlawson_ What I find fascinating about all these videos of trans people is their incredible ability to spout utter nonsense platitudes with an air of authority.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@TPointUK What’s the surprise? Anglicans might even disbelieve in the Resurrection....

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@TaylorRMarshall With all due respect to the Archbishop, he strikes me as that old uncle who knows two or three "youth" things and thinks that makes him cool

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@arthurdutrra The fact that Anitta’s faces - plural - can become a subject of debate merely reveals the level of consumerist artificiality masquerading as a genuine identity.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@stephengadubato I would simply call it unnecessary.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@Keir_Starmer The liberal logic is completely distorted by ideology. I agree with regulating social media use for adolescents, but it makes absolutely no sense when that same party believes these very same adolescents can supposedly change their gender and self-mutilate.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@00AgentSquirrel @judeokeyvlogs The year is 2026.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@00AgentSquirrel @judeokeyvlogs Evangelization is not a free-for-all. The form definitely affects the content of the message.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@maattttbrown @SFGate The great irony is that they actually think they are being extremely bold with this stance, when in reality they are just reproducing the same mainstream narrative.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@nytimes @TheAthletic The irony is that no one complains about the fact that they were first forced to wear a cap representing an ideological narrative they disagree with. Freedom is always a two-way road otherwise it becomes totalitarianism, even if it’s dressed up in rainbow colors.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@Rich_Cooper The great irony is that after the idea of ​​masculinity was deconstructed, the trans agenda - which is, in a sense, extremely "conservative," given the reliance on gender identities—is now going to define what masculinity is.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@TaylorRMarshall In 1646, King John IV of Portugal placed the Portuguese crown at the feet of Our Lady proclaiming her the true Queen of Portugal. From that day forward, monarchs never again wore the royal crown, recognizing that the kingdom belonged only to Mary Most Holy.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@BillboardChris The trans movement is based on a major rhetorical fallacy: the deconstruction of the concept of gender is simultaneously reinforced by the very idea of ​​transition.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@Gaynotqueer1 You cannot deconstruct concepts and use them to back yourself up at the same time.

[Barthélemy R. @bartirous]

@Gaynotqueer1 So many layers of self-denial. If all identities are constructs, how does one transition when doing so reinforces the very constructs one was previously fighting against? And if everything is a matter of free choice, how can one speak of masculinity as such?