@kunchenguid Legacy code is also merged code, their ambiguity in communication might be too loose and cause this discrepancy. Also "Over 80%" might logically equal 100% lol
Business decisions fall on a spectrum from extraction to added value. Extraction might be beneficial in the short term, but I theorize that added value is the most self-beneficial choice in the long term.
If AI music is truly inferior because it has no soul, then human music with soul should have a lasting competitive advantage. If fans or musicians are still afraid that AI will replace human artists, they are implicitly admitting that much of the music they defend may have been soulless all along.
I think both sides mostly agree itβs no longer about the music itself being βsoulless,β but rather that most counterarguments are either economic or moral in nature, which is completely valid.
Whatever your stance, AI music is here to stay. Small artists will likely have to adapt their incentive structures around income rather than resorting to Nietzschean ressentiment.
@Vanarchain What if a person creates AI music based on one's deepest emotions, i.e. the emotions are entirely in the song's output but not in the process?
"you can outsource your thinking, but you canβt outsource your understanding"
easy to forget in todays AI era, worth remembering everyday as we all wield more intelligence!
@LDonivan@Law661039Law I have no incentive to "win" this discussion either way, I'm just exploring both sides. However, since I simply enjoy listening to AI music, I fail to see what is wrong with me according to the proponents.