The left understands how to win: bait us into their frame. Distract us with “good faith debate”. Who cares about winning the argument when you enter the frame of your enemy? You amplify more the other cause.
The right hasn’t learnt the lesson of Trump: make a larger insane offer, the other side calls you crazy but leans into your argument and accepts the softer version. You win. Literally art of the deal.
That’s what the left is doing to us.
Another Right-wing persuasion fail.
“If we give them facts and logic, they’ll understand what they’re doing is wrong.”
No, you don’t get it — they know it’s evil. That’s why they support it.
They’re not “deceived.” It’s just who they are.
@bykemp@thomasthebull Your leftist shits wear che Guevara shirts, have commie symbols and praise commie leaders. You’re a fucking retard. This shit doesn’t work.
"More important than the bible". Watch Hamas Piker go full soyjak when a CCP agent gives him a copy of Mao Zedong's Little Red Book in China. The red book boasts about Mao's communist revolution in China when he killed 42M+ people in 4 years.
Fulton Sheen explained that since God is the source of our rights, the communist must wage war against God in order to deny the true source of our rights
It's insane to me that some people are going to vote for the politicians who created all their problems, just to spite the politicians who are fixing their problems...because they're fixing them slower than they'd hoped.
Elections have consequences, people. Trust me.
Spencer Pratt: It's not a Democrat Machine. It's a Corrupt Criminal Mafia Cartel.
PRATT: “They launder all of our tax money to increase people dying on our streets.”
Calling them a machine only softens how evil and deliberate their actions really are.
*posted yesterday for subscribers
A father of two children has been jailed after throwing a plastic bottle at the police and swearing at officers during the illegal migrant protest in Portsmouth.
Sentenced to a two year prison sentence.
The judge said it would act 'as a deterrent'
Now, let me be abundantly clear.
I do not believe that any violence against the police is acceptable.
I also do not believe that a two year prison sentence is appropriate, particularly when we are allowing paedophiles and rapists to roam our streets because of a supposed lack of prison capacity.
The BBC reports the man 'said he had found the bottle on the ground and was going to throw it into a nearby bush, but was angry and so threw it up into the air.'
Reportedly, he told the officers to 'f*** off' and 'pointed aggressively' at them (ITV).
I can understand the anger, to be honest. This was happening as illegal migrants were being ferried into his town.
This sentence is unfair, unjust and morally wrong.
Let's be honest about what has happened here.
The establishment is making an example of this man to deter others from protesting.
A two year sentence is absolutely outrageous - there are far better ways for him to make right the wrong.
The third world invaders are greeted to luxury accommodation as heroes, yet this man will rot in prison.
It's not right.
The right has been correct about almost everything. The hour is too late for people to hand wring or add in qualifiers. "I'm not a far right wing psycho, and disagree with them, BUT..." The right is right. The far right is even righter.
John Cleese coming right out and saying "we should have cut the darkies' nuts off" is the biggest white pill I've ever seen.
Maybe more old folks will get the courage to agree out loud because of him.
Remember: you create what you speak
If you vote Labor, Greens or Teals, you are voting for virtue signalling frauds. They have been in charge for almost five years, and are the reason you are poorer today.
It’s not a coincidence they’re always ugly dysgenic freaks. Communism is a manifestation of unmitigated self-loathing. It is a religion of malcontents that worships ugliness, and rejects the beauty that God bestows upon us.
I’m autistic myself, Philip. My argument has nothing to do with disability. My concern is the incentive structure: when someone depends financially on the state, they may have a direct personal incentive to support higher government spending and benefits, even when those policies conflict with what others believe is best for the economy.