One of the things that becomes very obvious when studying the various camp staff members who got absolutely vilified Nuremberg is how many (even most) kept protesting they'd do nothing like was claimed about them and were just bewildered at what was going on.
@Villgecrazylady Anyone who kills three kids in cold blood needs to be removed from the gene pool. It doesn't matter if it was a moment of madness or fully intentional. She has that evil in her and needs to be removed from society forever.
NSDAP use of forced labor during WWII is routinely condemned by the ruling academic elite at the same time they endorse and support Soviet use of forced labor during the time period. The difference is Oswald Pohl was a German and Lazar Berenzon was a Jew.
https://t.co/2xcJPQoDUx
It will never not be funny to me that when Napoleon got stripped of his empire and exiled to Elba he responded by paving the roads, draining marshes, rebuilding the iron mines & ordered every house to install a toilet in just 2 months. "energy is a choice" he said.
Another instant tell of midwittery is the inability to see China as it is. Their ability to mobilize and put all resources towards achieving a goal is a direct result of being a nationally socialist ethnostate. Leftists see China as this communist utopia when really it’s far closer to (ethnic not civil) national socialist. They believe in Chinese superiority, they believe that Han Chinese is the master race. Everything they do is out of Chinese pride. The CCP supports not just “the Worker” but “the Chinese Worker”.
I point this out because of the irony of it. These same leftist types radically oppose even defining WHAT an American is. They wholeheartedly detest the group that wants to stop demographic change and illegal immigration. Yet they applaud China’s achievements. They celebrate (or shriek depending on who they’re in the conversation with) when China beats us in some academic or scientific pissing contest, yet support importing millions of people from places where the average iq is 80. If you had such a commitment to Scientific and Academic excellence, as you say, wouldn’t you want to seek out the truth?
Tankies are right about the CIA. Note that she says here they received funds in the 50s for 'international programmes'. She's talking about the forerunner to Trotskyite Carl Gershman's NED.
They push critical theory garbage around the world to break down barriers to capitalism.
Tucker points out the connection between those that are pushing us in pointless middle eastern wars, and those that are pushing gambling, OnlyFans and personal destruction….
“It’s hard to ignore that the presidents top donor runs a gambling empire… Ben Shapiro is shilling for gambling… the guy who owns OnlyFans is AIPACS biggest donor… maybe there’s a connection there.”
-Tucker Carlson
this is what true scholarship looks like. if your academics do not discourse like that, it is a sign they are merely strivers wearing their diplomas and titles as a skinsuit. they have captured the academia and the research is suffering for it.
@allhailthebot@MediaSOI Banning circumcision would make a big difference and it’s something that should be able to win popular support since it’s an apolitical science based health policy (which if enforced properly would do a lot to encourage self deportation of both of these groups)
I have been thinking a lot about this task and how to contribute to it ever since coming across primary source materials from national socialist writers (only fairly recently).
We face a lot of challenges that the marxists, being fundamentally allies of our liberal capitalist elite, simply don’t have to contend with. Censorship resistance and anonymity add a lot complexity for the website builder and for users, when real censorship resistance is necessary.
I’m still not certain how much is required. It depends greatly on the content served and the accompanying commentary. For example, a strict archive without commentary or social features is probably going to attract less negative attention.
I personally wish for a more durable forum for intelligent discussion of the primary material, however that should be separate from the archive of original material since it has very different technical requirements and risks.