@SpudmanWP@2AFDN Nuance is used to uphold many things that aren’t new tech or social issues. The intent of the writers is irrelevant. Bruen is insufficient to achieve its intended goal. Bruen itself fails the Bruen test, so I don’t expect non compliant circuits to give it much consideration.
@SpudmanWP@2AFDN The question isn’t the primary issue. The primary issue is Bruen established the text, history, tradition test but failed to define the historical era that applied and what constituted a tradition of regulation. Footnote 9 and “nuanced approach” did more damage.
@SpudmanWP@2AFDN If Bruen actually struck down laws, it may be a worthwhile trade off but Bruen upholds essentially everything and strikes down essentially nothing.
@MorosKostas “Everything is a license and nothing is an arm.”
It would be really nice if the Supreme Court would write one 2A opinion that they don’t immediately undermine in dicta or “concurrence”.
@MorosKostas Well, it’s a good thing SCOTUS prioritized the rights of a drug dealing Iranian sympathizer. Really making the most of the few cases they take.
@2Aupdates Just goes to show they aren’t worth the effort and are likely enemies in the long run. Lefties and socialists aren’t pro 2A. They are anti conservative. They’ll use the 2A against us.
@NateSilver538 Well, it’s hard to know how many fake ballots you need until you count all the real ballots. Filling out the fake ballots also takes plenty of time.