Brent Terry

[Marc Thiessen @marcthiessen]

Correct. Trump buried Iran’s nuclear material so deep that, senior officials tell me, Iran has indicated the United States will have to dig it up because it can’t reach it to hand over. He also took out over 85 percent of Iran’s defense industrial base; sank its navy; grounded its air force; damaged its centrifuges; and decimated its ballistic missile capabilities, conventional military forces and infrastructure of repression. He not only eliminated Iran’s supreme leader, he also took out dozens of other senior Iranian officials. That is in addition to Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s terrorist mastermind, whom Trump killed in his first term. Today, thanks to Trump, Iran’s top leadership has been annihilated, the regime can no longer project power in the Middle East and it possesses only a “nuisance” capability, according to Adm. Brad Cooper, head of U.S. Central Command. No president in 47 years has done more damage to the Iranian regime than Trump has.

More here: https://t.co/5tY8xsXykr

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@EWErickson You actually believe that it was the Taliban that soured the voters on Biden rather than his obvious dementia and skyrocketing inflation?!

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@charliebilello Trump did it for a few months bc of Iran War. Why did Biden do it for 3.5 years?

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

Hat tip to the great @mazemoore for the 2012 footage

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

Big news last night on CNN! I learned that for 1.6 billion years, algae was completely undefeated in warm stagnant pools...until Obama personally cured it with "science."

You really do learn something new every day. 🤣

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@BarackObama @MichelleObama You all called each other Nazis and corrupt and criminal for years and years. We’re you lying then or are you lying now?

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@joncoopertweets They all called each other Nazis and corrupt and criminal for years and years. We’re they lying then or are they lying now?

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@NYPostOpinion Wrong.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@ChrisMurphyCT It’s a plane for all future presidents.

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@AnnCoulter https://t.co/2z8WH9wuF8

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@JonahDispatch https://t.co/2z8WH9wuF8

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@NRO @RLHeinrichs Wrong.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@smerconish Wrong.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@marcthiessen Wrong.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@NBCNews Wrong.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@JessicaTarlov Wrong.

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@AmbJohnBolton https://t.co/7sA2mcSAXN

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@thehill Wrong

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@AmericaRpts @SenJohnKennedy https://t.co/2z8WH9wuF8

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."

[Brent Terry @Bbtlat11]

@scrowder https://t.co/2z8WH9wuF8

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

JD Vance just gave the clearest breakdown of the Trump vs. Obama Iran deal distinction I've heard.

Here it is — the Gulf State test:

The Gulf Coast Coalition loves this deal.
They hated the Obama deal.

Why?

They thought Obama made Iran stronger.
They think Trump makes Iran weaker.

Vance: "They know more about this, and they have more to lose than anybody, including the USA. So I trust their judgment."

The negotiating position:

Obama in 2015: Iran has a sophisticated nuclear program. Let's bribe them with American money to stop it.

Trump in 2026: We already destroyed your nuclear program. Promise not to rebuild it, and you get some sanctions relief.

One is negotiating from fear.
The other is negotiating from rubble.

The substance:

"The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment, ours will not."

"The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material, ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material."

"The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. This deal gives them $0 of American money."

Bottom line from @JDVance:

"We're coming at it from a position of strength, and the fact that our gulf coast partners love this deal."