50,000 households headed by foreigners are getting full welfare in Japan.
The average Japanese worker takes home maybe 25,000 dollars a year after taxes.
These foreign households get their rent paid, full medical care, living money, and some of them even demand support for dozens of kids they claim are back in their home country. All on Japanese taxpayers’ money.
Japanese people get arrested and publicly named even for small crimes.
Certain foreigners get released quietly and nothing gets reported.
Japanese families go to the welfare office and get turned away or treated like beggars.
But certain foreigners, with left-wing politicians backing them, get approved easily. And then they start claiming benefits for their overseas families too.
I used to think only Japanese politicians had lost their minds. But it looks like this is happening all over the world now.
Everyone, please tell me.
Why does the world, why do countries, ignore the people who have always been here, and even ignore the skilled foreigners who come and contribute properly…
But give the most favorable treatment to the ones who are the least welcome, the lowest value, the ones with no income who keep causing crime?
Are they space invaders sent here to destroy the Earth from the inside?
Are they reincarnations of small plants and animals that hate humans?
Have they all gone insane from some weird virus in their brains?
Why can they do something this abnormal?
Someone please tell me.
Please, help me understand.
Normalize buying land with your siblings and closest friends and building a place where your families can grow together.
Modern isolation isn't how people were meant to live. A few generations ago, extended families often lived just down the road from one another. Meals were shared, support was always nearby, and childcare wasn't a constant concern.
Bring back the village.
between Henry Nowak, the beheading attempt in Northern Ireland, the rape gang report, and the 3 year old boy thrown into the crocodile pit, I genuinely don't understand how the entirety of the UK is not engulfed in flames right now
@BlueBoxDave Blacks enabled the Muslims to take over, thinking they were “allies” and not “conquerors”.
Fools who’d not read history. Nor understood the game. Nor had even read about the Iranian revolution, nor the status of Blacks in the Middle East.
Trump says his Iran deal avoided a “worldwide depression.”
That is not a boast. It is an indictment.
It means the war ended not because Iran was defeated, not because the regime capitulated, not because its nuclear and missile programs were dismantled — but because Iran succeeded in turning the Strait of Hormuz into a hostage.
That was the decisive issue from the beginning.
And it was completely foreseeable.
The Strait is not a symbol. It is one of the central arteries of the world economy. Roughly 20% of global petroleum liquids and a major share of LNG normally move through it. Iran sits on the northern shore with mines, missiles, drones, coastal batteries, and fast boats. Everyone knew this. The Pentagon knew it. The Navy knew it. Tehran knew it.
The United States has spent decades planning, exercising, and operating in precisely this battlespace.
This is not some mysterious, unforeseeable problem. The Navy has escorted tankers through the Persian Gulf before. It has fought Iran’s navy before. It has practiced mine-countermeasures, maritime security, convoy protection, unmanned surveillance, and freedom-of-navigation operations in and around the Strait for years.
The issue was never whether America had the capability to keep the straits open.
It did.
The issue was whether the president would make preventing Iran from closing the Straits of Hormuz a strategic objective of the war.
Trump CHOSE not to.
That decision doomed the war from the start.
Control of the Strait did not mean occupying Iran. It did not mean guaranteeing zero risk. It meant declaring, from the first hour, that the Strait is an international waterway; that no Iranian mine, missile battery, drone site, fast boat, “permit authority,” or IRGC toll booth would be allowed to determine whether world trade moves; and that every asset threatening commercial shipping would be destroyed.
Control meant executing on the Navy’s existing plans.
That should have been the opening strategic objective.
Instead, Trump failed to act and instead treated Hormuz as a bargaining chip.
I identified this on my show a week into the war and said it on my show: if the United States does not break Iran’s control over Hormuz immediately, every later battlefield success will be strategically compromised.
That is exactly what happened.
The U.S. and Israel hit Iran hard. The White House says more than 10,000 sorties were flown and more than 13,000 targets were struck. Iranian air defenses, command nodes, missile sites, naval targets, and parts of the regime’s military infrastructure were devastated.
But tactical destruction is not victory.
Victory requires identifying the enemy’s decisive leverage and breaking it.
Iran’s leverage was Hormuz.
If America controls the Strait, Iran is isolated. Its exports are constrained. Its revenue dries up. Its regime faces the consequences of aggression. The pressure falls on Tehran.
If Iran controls the Strait, the pressure falls on Washington. Oil prices rise. LNG markets tighten. Allies panic. Markets wobble. Governments demand de-escalation. Suddenly the aggressor is negotiating from leverage.
That is exactly what happened.
Iran did not need to defeat the U.S. Navy. It only needed to convince American politicians that reopening the Strait by force was too risky, too costly, too frightening.
And Trump accepted that premise.
Once he did, the war was lost politically, no matter how many targets were destroyed.
The tragedy is that America did not lack the means. It lacked the will and the strategic clarity.
A serious administration would have flooded the theater early, established overwhelming control of the air and sea approaches, protected commercial transit, cleared mines, destroyed minelayers, and made clear that any Iranian attempt to close the Strait would bring immediate military consequences.
Hard? Yes.
Risky? Of course.
But wars are hard and risky. That is why they must be fought only when the objective is clear and the will exists to achieve it.
The unforgivable error was going to war while leaving Iran’s strongest weapon intact.
And now we have a deal that reportedly reopens the Strait temporarily, lifts parts of the blockade, offers sanctions relief, unfreezes billions, contemplates a massive reconstruction fund, and postpones the hardest questions: missiles, proxies, enrichment, and the survival of the regime itself.
This is not how a serious country wins a war.
This is how it buys time from the enemy after failing to neutralize the enemy’s strongest weapon.
The worst part is not this agreement. The worst part is the precedent.
Iran now knows that if it can close Hormuz long enough, America will bargain. China is watching. Every hostile regime sitting near a chokepoint is watching. The lesson they will draw is obvious: do not defeat the U.S. military; threaten the arteries of trade until American politicians fear the economic consequences of victory.
That is the catastrophe.
Not merely that Trump blinked. Not merely that Iran survived. But that the United States taught its enemies that control over trade routes can substitute for military power.
Wars are not won by counting targets destroyed. They are won by achieving the political objective.
The objective should have been the defeat of the Iranian regime and the restoration of absolute freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf.
Instead, America settled for a pause — and Iran kept the weapon.
The bill for that failure will not come due all at once.
But it will come due.
Complete silence from the Royals about The Rape Gang Enquiry report.
This is a Christian country and always will be.
You are Defender of the Faith, Charles.
Come on, do your job!
We built this country, not your muslim chums.
When your police take a young girl who was raped by pakistani immigrants and return her not to her parents, but to the pakistani immigrants and tell them to 'have fun with her,' your entire system has to burn.
Let me explain to you the Muslim strategy here: a short 🧵
When you see hundreds of thousands of Muslims pouring into the streets of Europe, it’s to measure strength and reaction. They lull you to sleep with “peaceful” demonstrations.
One of these days they will do it and rush all the levers of power: Parliament, 10 Downing, police stations, etc. Jihadists will, in a moment, control the country. Police and military, caught unaware and in insufficient numbers, will be overwhelmed.
It’s what they did in Gaza: Rush the border fence every week for months and years on end and then back away without crossing the frontier. Soon, the IDF just ignored them. Then one day they rushed the fence and penetrated it in 100+ locations to murder and rape thousands.
And no one saw it coming.
@Tesla4J25334@mamboitaliano__ And I was a journalist for DW based out of Brussels. Lol. I’ve lived or worked all over Europe.
I know my way around.
Making my scrolling without reading extra embarrassing.
😂
Apologies. I did not read the full post. I just saw that it was Mambo and assumed it was Italy.
But Greece needs to do the same, especially the islands.
All the heavily touristed areas of the planet do, for they will be slowly destroyed.
Venice & the one highly photographed street in Brooklyn come to mind. As does Rockefeller Center at Christmas.
The British government knew that they were importing rapists.
They knew because they ordered our soldiers not to intervene when our Afghan ‘allies’ raped children on a daily basis.
The British government literally instructed the military top brass that raping children is part of Afghan culture and then they brought 100,000 Afghans to the UK.
They also knew about the Pakistani/muslim rape gangs from the 1950s… yet they still allowed millions more to come here.
Why?
Labour: Rapes for Votes.
(They all vote Labour)
Tories: Rapes for Cash
(Wage suppression, property tycoon donors, etc)
There’s roughly 10x more rape in Britain today than there was 25 years ago and the government’s response has been to simply stop recording the ethnicity of the rapists.
Over 60% of rapists have their ethnicity recorded as unknown.
That’s how the government hides the fact that they have brought rapists to our country.
We need to collect that data and remove any group with high rape statistics.
I don’t care if our corrupt government has given them a British passport.
They cannot stay here raping British women and girls.
@wil_da_beast630 As I just posted elsewhere, some of us follow internal Vatican politics.
We’ve had two apostate, ahistorical Popes in a row.
https://t.co/d9knQ5iEhy
Duchesne, look at the details:
1) Pope Francis sent Cardinal Parolin to cut a deal with the CCP.
2) Pope Francis was fully into Liberation Theology, a Marxist Latin American movement.
3) Cardinal Parolin’s deal granted Xi, an atheist, the right to pick all Chinese priests and cardinals.
4) Xi picked Cardinal Chow, who apparently voted for Pope Leo, also heavily exposed to Liberation Theology in Peru.
5) Never in the 2000 year history of the Catholic Church have atheists been allowed to pick priests & cardinals.
6) We have two ahistorical, apostate Popes.
7) They’re communists, but if we survived the Borgias, we’ll survive a few apostate communists.
I hope & pray that’s so.
Duchesne, look at the details:
1) Pope Francis sent Cardinal Parolin to cut a deal with the CCP.
2) Pope Francis was fully into Liberation Theology, a Marxist Latin American movement.
3) Cardinal Parolin’s deal granted Xi, an atheist, the right to pick all Chinese priests and cardinals.
4) Xi picked Cardinal Chow, who apparently voted for Pope Leo, also heavily exposed to Liberation Theology in Peru.
5) Never in the 2000 year history of the Catholic Church have atheists been allowed to pick priests & cardinals.
6) We have two ahistorical, apostate Popes.
7) They’re communists, but if we survived the Borgias, we’ll survive a few apostate communists.
I hope & pray that’s so.
@ApexSeeker_ It’s about average behavior as a group.
People dislike those whose behavior is generally negative or costly to society.
And people wanting to be with their own.
And, it’s Darwinian. “The other” may be dangerous.
@OKAYFINE_Music@AK74StL Brett Baier had a poll on his show yesterday.
A majority of Republicans oppose the deal.
I voted for Trump, Catholic, never been to Israel & I think it will go down in history as one of the worst foreign affairs deals of all time.